Slashdot Mirror


Small, High-Resolution LCD Monitors?

An anonymous reader writes "I'm a veteran user of an old 17" Dell Trinitron CRT monitor. I run it at 1400x1050 with an 80Hz refresh rate — about as high as it goes before it'll go out of the monitor's scan range. More recently I've been looking to finally upgrade to an LCD monitor but found that, for the most part, every 17" monitor on the market runs natively at 1280x1024, as does every 19" monitor — I have to go for a 20" to go higher. Now yes, I know I'm complaining about just 120 pixels horizontal and 26 pixels vertical, but my laptop's 15" display runs natively at 1400x1050. Is there any standalone monitor on the market that'll natively do higher than 1280x1024 without killing my desk space?"

5 of 370 comments (clear)

  1. Re:One thing I hate by SirCowMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Turn a widescreen sideways, your drivers should support screen rotation :)

    --
    !Equality through palindromes semordnilap hguorht ytilauqE!
  2. The goggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It does nothing.

  3. Re:Syncmaster by SignalFreq · · Score: 5, Informative

    ASUS VW192T+ 19", 1680 x 1050, $120
    http://www.superwarehouse.com/ASUS_VW192T+_19_Widescreen_LCD_Monitor/VW192T+/ps/1562122

    ViewSonic VX1940w 19", 1680 x 1050, $150
    http://www.superwarehouse.com/ViewSonic_VX1940w_19_Widescreen_LCD_Monitor/VX1940W/ps/1504859

    Or if you want really high resolution (and have too much money):
    EIZO RadiForce GS310-CL Single Head 20.8", 2048 x 1536, $6k
    http://www.superwarehouse.com/EIZO_RadiForce_GS310-CL_Single_Head_20.8_LCD_Monitor/GS310-CL-SH-MMP3P/ps/1543964

  4. Re:HD Capable by geekboy642 · · Score: 5, Informative

    In a CRT, there are two practical considerations that set the upper limit for resolution: One is the dot pitch of the phosphor, the other is the speed/flexibility of the onboard signal processor. There's also, I assume, some upper limit for switching the electron gun. CPU is fairly cheap, and dot pitches of 0.22mm were common in the CRT era. At that pitch, the highest resolution would be something like 2048x1536.
    Contrast that to an LCD monitor, where every pixel is a discrete LCD element, complete with wires and transistors for addressing. LCD dot pitches are in the 0.5-0.6mm range, and making them smaller is very expensive currently. Sadly, only us geeks seem to care that there is such a disparity with the "new and improved" technology.

    --
    Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
  5. Re:Killing desk space? by shirai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a fantastic idea and having used monitors in portrait mode (vertically oriented) instead of landscape mode, I can never go back. Better yet, there are many monitors that have a built in pivot. You can fit twice as many lines of code and still take very little desk space.

    This monitor is a good example.

    http://accessories.dell.com/sna/products/Monitors/productdetail.aspx?c=ca&l=en&s=bsd&cs=cabsdt1&sku=320-6272

    It is 24" but if you scroll down, you will see how it probably doesn't take any more room than a 17" in landscape mode.

    Seriously, as a developer, designer, writer, etc. this is one of the best upgrades you can make.

    --
    Sunny

    Be my Friend