Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Comcast DNS Redirection Launched In Trial Markets

Posted by timothy on from the looks-like-you-want-xxy-porn dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Comcast has finally launched its DNS Redirector service in trial markets (Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington state), and has submitted a working draft of the technology to the IETF for review. Comcast customers can opt-out from the service by providing their account username and cable modem MAC address. Customers in trial areas using 'old' Comcast DNS servers, or non-Comcast DNS servers, should not be affected by this. This deployment comes after many previous ISPs, like DSLExtreme, were forced to pull the plug on such efforts as a result of customer disapproval/retaliation. Some may remember when VeriSign tried this back in 2003, where it also failed."

11 of 362 comments (clear)

  1. malware by sopssa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another great press release about how it will be helpful and a "service" for users, while the main purpose is just to gather extra advertisement revenue (while breaking internet standards). I mean, this is what malware do. Oh well, atleast these non-us ISP's dont do such dirty acts to their customers here. Time to voice your opinion maybe?

    1. Re:malware by jank1887 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      modern corporate culture demands profit growth. not just continued profit, but growth of profits. how do you expect that to happen in a saturated market?

    2. Re:malware by MrMr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have the government outlaw your product?

  2. Who's providing a backdoor DNS service? by argent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like time to pick some semi-standard alternate port number and start setting up some alternate recursive DNS servers, something between alt.* and TOR.

    1. Re:Who's providing a backdoor DNS service? by 644bd346996 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why? It's not like Comcast is going to be intercepting all DNS traffic and routing it through their spammy DNS servers. Only the people who get their resolvers from DHCP (ie the people who don't know enough to care) will be affected.

  3. Keep trying till you succeed by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When in doubt, keep trying. When rejected, keep trying. Enough people do this, it becomes the norm. Sad, but true.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  4. Re:The Sky isn't faling. by mdmkolbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Providing a nice GUI on a DNS lookup fail is the job of the web browser not the DNS server. DNS is infrastructure not user interface.

  5. Re:So should... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No.

    Knock this shit off and mods, wise the fuck up. Just because it has "open" in the name doesn't make it suddenly good and benevolent, They do the exact same fucking thing.

    Anyone who's been on slashdot for more than a week or two probably has seen dozens of comments suggesting OpenDNS in cases like this, always modded up. Every single time people post corrections pointing out that they do the same thing. Does anyone ever listen?

    Wise the fuck up

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  6. Re:The Sky isn't faling. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If a domain name does not exist, I want my systems to receive an error telling them so, not be redirected to a system that they were not expecting to be directed to.

  7. Re:The Sky isn't faling. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you think it's OK to hijack DNS think about what happens if you mistype an email address, or what happens when your configured NTP server goes offline.

  8. Re:I'm done. I'll be switching as soon as possible by griffjon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Me too.

    Oh wait, Comcast doesn't have any competition for high-speed where I live.

    Go go gadget free market!

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer