Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Of Science and Choice In Online Dating

Posted by kdawson on from the not-the-only-starfish-in-the-sea dept.

Must be summertime, as online publications turn to the contemplation of Internet dating. The NY Times's piece (registration may be required) takes a not particularly deep look at the reality behind the "science" claims of chemistry.com, eHarmony.com, and others. "The question is how much it really matters to users if the methods have any scientific basis. A friend of mine... said she looked at several dating sites and chose the ones that looked like they had 'the least riffraff.'" Technology Review focuses on studies showing that the overwhelming number of choices presented by many dating sites can be counterproductive: "...more search options lead to less selective processing by reducing users' cognitive resources, distracting them with irrelevant information, and reducing their ability to screen out inferior options." The article concludes with a look at the startup Omnidate, which offers technology for 3D virtual dating. The site has had twice as many women (by percentage) sign up as the other dating sites typically see.

11 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. The biggest problem with dating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...are the women.

    Anyone who can solve that problem deserves a Nobel.

    1. Re:The biggest problem with dating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe you should give men a try.

    2. Re:The biggest problem with dating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe you should give men a try.

      Wait, that's an option? You mean to tell me that I can date someone who likes sports, video games, fast cars, and drinking beer? That sounds so awesome. It almost sounds too good to be true. What are the downsides?

    3. Re:The biggest problem with dating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No one to be in the kitchen :(

    4. Re:The biggest problem with dating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It can be a pain in the ass from time to time.

  2. Re:Virtual dating by Zarlan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are you suggesting people should get a SECOND Life?

  3. "twice as many women....." until now! by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The site has had twice as many women (by percentage) sign up as the other dating sites typically see.

    A new meaning was given to the term "slashdot effect" today, as hordes of /. readers register on the site, changing its demographics to be similar to other dating sites.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  4. twice as many women signed up? by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure they did. You go on believing that.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  5. Re:Science, lol? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Luckily, two dear lady friends helped me to understand what I needed to know and I'm now very happily married.

    Shit, where is that legal? I'm packing now...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Re:Why online "dating" is useful by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you have anything resembling standards, dating is really, really fucking hard.

    Especially if she has standards too.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  7. No, that just means you're a crazy too. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I used OKCupid regularly, I encountered a large number of women I would classify as crazy.

    Because they use regression analysis to match people, that means you must correlate with the crazies.

     

    --
    Deleted