Slashdot Mirror


Canonical Fully Open-Sources the Launchpad Code

kfogel writes "Canonical has just fully open-sourced the code to Launchpad. Although we'd said earlier that a couple of components would be held back, we changed our mind. All the code has been released under the GNU Affero General Public License, version 3. 'Canonical will continue to run the Launchpad servers, taking care of production and deployment issues; opening up the code doesn't mean burdening the users with all of that stuff. At the same time, we'll institute processes to shepherd community-contributed code into the system, so that people who have ideas for how to improve Launchpad can quickly turn these ideas into reality.'"

4 of 104 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I guess it closes bug #393596 ? by FireFury03 · · Score: -1, Troll

    Status should be changed to "Fix released", then:

    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-community/+bug/393596

    Not really - the bug is calling for code to be released under a Free licence. The AGPL isn't a Free licence.

  2. What influenced this move? by bogaboga · · Score: -1, Troll

    Did Google's Chrome OS have something to do with this move, I think so. Why you may ask: Because entry of another Linux based Open Source OS into the Linux playground does nothing to further Canonical's ambitions.

    Now waiting on Adobe and its Flash Technologies to do likewise.

  3. Re:I guess it closes bug #393596 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    The GNU affero is an abomination.

    A customer of mine was skeptical about open source. Then one of their people started reading the Affero GPL, and was terrified ("this means they can do a surprise inspection on our premises!") now anything with GPL or open source is out of the question. They even bought an xserve for php

  4. Re:Bazaar only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I've heard that the Bazaar svn plugin is quite good.

    It has to be because practically nobody outside ubuntu weenies uses "bizarre". There's currently 3 sensible choices of SCM for open source projects.

    1. Git
    2. Mercurial
    3. Subversion

    The only 'win' you get from using 'bizarre' for your open source project is that nobody even bothers checking out your code on account of the kooky SCM.