Slashdot Mirror


Artificial Brain '10 Years Away'

SpuriousLogic writes "A detailed, functional artificial human brain can be built within the next 10 years, a leading scientist has claimed. Henry Markram, director of the Blue Brain Project, has already built elements of a rat brain. He told the TED global conference in Oxford that a synthetic human brain would be of particular use finding treatments for mental illnesses. Around two billion people are thought to suffer some kind of brain impairment, he said. 'It is not impossible to build a human brain and we can do it in 10 years,' he said."

5 of 539 comments (clear)

  1. Not a replacement, folks by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is some supercomputer software to simulate a brain. Still cool!

  2. Re:Seems ethically dodgy... by twostix · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are willing to experiment on one, you might as well just use hobos and orphans and not have to wait a decade for fancy computers(though a simulation would have the huge advantage of read system state out of memory, no mucking around with FMRIs and stuff).

    Using orphans, prisoners the military and even middle and lower class children as unknowing guinea pigs was never a problem for many scientists and DRs until the '70s.

    Sorry scratch that for many it still isn't.

    One thing to notice is that various government departments are up to their arms in it as well.

    Some choice examples:

    (1957) "In order to study how blood flows through children's brains, researchers at Children's Hospital in Philadelphia perform the following experiment on healthy children, ranging in age from three to 11: They insert needles into each child's femoral artery (thigh) and jugular vein (neck), bringing the blood down from the brain. Then, they force each child to inhale gas through a facemask. In their subsequent Journal of Clinical Investigation article on this study, the researchers note that, in order to perform the experiment, they had to restrain some of the child test subjects by bandaging them to boards (Goliszek). "

    (1962) New York University researcher Saul Krugman promises parents with mentally disabled children definite enrollment into the Willowbrook State School in Staten Island, N.Y., a resident mental institution for mentally retarded children, in exchange for their signatures on a consent form for procedures presented as "vaccinations." In reality, the procedures involve deliberately infecting children with viral hepatitis by feeding them an extract made from the feces of infected patients, so that Krugman can study the course of viral hepatitis as well the effectiveness of a hepatitis vaccine

    (1962)
    Researchers at the Laurel Children's Center in Maryland test experimental acne antibiotics on children and continue their tests even after half of the young test subjects develop severe liver damage because of the experimental medication (Goliszek).

    (1963)
    Researchers at the University of Washington directly irradiate the testes of 232 prison inmates in order to determine radiation's effects on testicular function. When these inmates later leave prison and have children, at least four have babies born with birth defects. The exact number is unknown because researchers never follow up on the men to see the long-term effects of their experiment (Goliszek).

    (1967)

    Researchers paralyze 64 prison inmates in California with a neuromuscular compound called succinylcholine, which produces suppressed breathing that feels similar to drowning. When five prisoners refuse to participate in the medical experiment, the prison's special treatment board gives researchers permission to inject the prisoners with the drug against their will

    (1968)
    Planned Parenthood of San Antonio and South Central Texas and the Southwest Foundation for Research and Education begin an oral contraceptive study on 70 poverty-stricken Mexican-American women, giving only half the oral contraceptives they think they are receiving and the other half a placebo. When the results of this study are released a few years later, it stirs tremendous controversy among Mexican-Americans

    (1990)
    The CDC and Kaiser Pharmaceuticals of Southern California inject 1,500 six-month-old black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles with an "experimental" measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States. Adding to the risk, children less than a year old may not have an adequate amount of myelin around their nerves, possibly resulting in impaired neural development because of the vaccine. The CDC later admits that parents were never informed that the vaccine being injected into their children was experimental (Goliszek).

    I wonder how many here will defend these scientists and their experiments?

  3. Re:don't believe it by lee1026 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You don't have to build a self-modifying learning machine. You can emulate one of those via a machine that is not self-modifying. See:Turing completeness.

  4. Re:don't believe it by grumbel · · Score: 3, Informative

    like twins feeling what the other feels

    Thats coincidence and selective memory. If you have two people having random feelings, chances are, they end up feeling the same every now and then and if that happens on some special occasion, they remember it. On the other side they forget the thousands of hours in which nothing happened and in which they did feel completly different quite easily.

    and people with transplanted organs perceiving memories of the donor.

    Thats called making shit up. You can claim to perceive "memories" all day long, since as long as they are vague and unspecific, you can't prove anything with it. On the other side if you would remember specific stuff, like the name of an anonymous donor, his phone number, etc. then you would have some good testable evidence that something special is going on, but so far, I don't think that has ever happened.

  5. Re:don't believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    When a bacteria gets in your bloodstream your don't consciously perceive it, but still your brains sends those white cells to the battle. So there you have a brain connection to reality that conscious can't perceive.

    Your brain does no such thing. When a bacterial infection is detected, it is detected by chemical differences between the cells that are part of the system and the invaders. Then, the cells that are part of the system end up releasing chemical changes that propagate through the system, and the immune system cells respond to that chemical signal.

     

    Stop thinking of your body as a singular system operated by your brain. It isn't. It is a group of many different, isolated subsystems that work within the same enclosed environment for a common purpose...keeping themselves in a working environment.