Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Professor Layton and the Curious Twitter Accounts

Posted by Soulskill on from the somebody-do-this-with-starcon2 dept.

Ssquared22 writes "'Frankly ... I'm ashamed. I have made myself a Twitter page and officially joined the world of technology. Perhaps Luke may help me update.' With those words on June 28, 2009, what had been just a fictional character in a Nintendo DS game became a fixture on Twitter. Over the coming days and weeks, the TopHatProfessor account would post dozens of riddles and brainteasers of the type found in 2008's Professor Layton and the Curious Village and the upcoming Professor Layton and the Diabolical Box, soliciting answers from his slowly growing cadre of followers. Along the way, the professor happily answered questions about the upcoming title and shared little slices of life from his day, all without ever breaking character. Many followers were bemused and intrigued by what they assumed was a clever new viral marketing campaign put on by Nintendo ahead of Diabolical Box's August release. In reality, though, the TopHatProfessor account was the work of a lone college student and amateur game journalist, trying to get attention for a game he felt was being sorely neglected by publisher Nintendo and the media at large."

10 of 26 comments (clear)

  1. Join us next time... by j741 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank you for your participation in our regularly scheduled program. Join us next time as we discuss a lone college student who is being sued by Nintendo for copyright infringement. ;)

    --
    - James
    1. Re:Join us next time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The smart thing would be to hire the guy part-time. Have him agree to some basic rules and maybe give him a guideline of what they'd work with. Or just let him be, and keep it purely fan-based.

      I mean, it's Nintendo...

      Not like they're SONY or anything...

    2. Re:Join us next time... by clang_jangle · · Score: 3, Informative
      Instead it will be as likely to end with a cease and desist or even a lawsuit. FTFA:

      While the reaction on Twitter was mostly positive and appreciative of DiLuigi's efforts, the reaction on gaming message board NeoGAF, where DiLuigi was a devoted member, was more negative. When a user turned up the fact that DiLuigi had used NeoGAF to promote the TopHatProfessor account without disclosing his role in creating it, the moderators decided to ban DiLuigi from further posting. "Nothing says more professional than faking a twitter as being some sort of pseudo official thing for Nintendo," wrote NeoGAF user shuri. "You did something stupid and then added layers of stupid on top of it. It was like a stupid cake. And now you're eating it," added user ShockingAlberto. "Why is a 'game journalist' viral marketing for Nintendo for free?" asked user Tiktaalik.

      They do have a point. Doing something like that without permission these days can land you in deep crap.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    3. Re:Join us next time... by DreamsAreOkToo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What the hell has happened to us where supporting an under appreciated venue has become grounds for suing? What the hell has happened to us where people are paid to do "viral marketing" but when a fan goes out and does it, they should become fearful of the law?

      Seriously, wtf has happened to my country?

    4. Re:Join us next time... by CodeBuster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about instead of suing him they offer him a job? Seriously, there are marketing professionals out there, some apparently working for Nintendo, who cannot create this kind of viral buzz (to use their awful words) even when the try deliberately.

    5. Re:Join us next time... by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They do have a point. Doing something like that without permission these days can land you in deep crap.

      Uh... I don't think any of the quotes from NeoGAF actually MADE that point.

      "shuri" pointed out that it wasn't very professional. (I'd argue that an amateur game journalist is, by definition, not professional.)

      "Shockingalberto" called it stupid several times. A real credit to NeoGAF forums right there.

      Finally "Tiktaalik" asked a question which seems pretty obvious: he liked the game, had a lot of free time (college student and "amateur game journalist"), and nintendo wouldn't have hired him.

      So... nothing I see about how it's dangerous. NeoGAF just seems angry that they weren't included. Maybe it's just typical angry online gamer talk, I don't know.

    6. Re:Join us next time... by seebs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They do have something of a point. I think. I don't entirely trust them. I had a neogaf account at one point, and a while back, I got a form letter ban message. I have no idea why. I wasn't active (hadn't posted in a few months), and queries have gone unanswered. So, I have no clue. Maybe someone broke into the account? Maybe they don't like inactive accounts? Maybe they were searching for threads at least six months old in which people posted something they don't like? I can't say, but I will say, I wouldn't count a neogaf ban as meaning anything. (And if anyone CAN tell me why my account got banned, well, I sure would be curious.)

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    7. Re:Join us next time... by Shikaku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fan created work is like free advertisement!

      Nobody would have ever heard of the game mostly if not for word of mouth. The touch of fame for even a fake Layton posting on Twitter would give loads of FREE advertisement to the game.

      Everyone wins.

      TRADEMARK. COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, CEASE AND DESIST. Everyone now loses. Nintedo is looked upon as a tyrant. The game will now have a negative connotation, of proprietary and locked down. The end.

      This story can be replaced with Chrono Trigger, and many other fan based games that got the axe because of this. I can't think of much off of the top of my head. (No Sonichu doesn't count).

  2. viral marketing by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... what they assumed was a clever new viral marketing campaign put on by Nintendo ahead of Diabolical Box's August release. In reality, though ...

    "... it was a clever new viral marketing campaign put on by some guy."

  3. Re:To be or not to be a Fictional Character by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you're not using any of the content from the game, and only a character's name, then you're only guilty of trademark infringement, and then only if it is a registered trademark or you are deliberately attempting to create confusion.

    Whether he can be found guilty of that latter is to be decided in a court of law if necessary, and cannot be determined here today.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"