Slashdot Mirror


Wi-Fi Allergy a PR Stunt

ADiamond writes "There is no Wi-Fi allergy. The English DJ claiming a Wi-Fi sensitivity, chronicled earlier, was a PR stunt to promote his new album. It would appear that the stunt was highly successful, appearing in multiple high-profile media outlets like The Sun, The Telegraph, and Fox News. The article at Ars goes on to discuss the evidence, or lack-thereof, of electromagnetic spectrum sensitivity."

18 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. It's Times Like These ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... I wish downloading an artists album without paying actually did do the artist physical/economic harm. Here's to hoping that later in life he suffers from an actual ailment while everyone ignores him.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:It's Times Like These ... by Smidge204 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to worry, if we use a high enough signal power I'm sure we can get a reaction of some kind.

      A few megawatts should just about do it.
      =Smidge=

  2. Oh, very fning funny by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now this story will linger as 'common knowledge' for years and rational people will have to cnstantly explain it was a PR stunt.

    Well done jackass, you've made the world a worse place.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Oh, very fning funny by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Both, plus the news outlets covering it. Everyone knows "wi-fi allergy" has already been disproved, which means there is no story. They might as well be running news articles and segments about how some guy claims to have gotten aids from a hug. UNLESS, they're covering it with the same "what a moron" treatment they would give that "woman claims daughter got pregnant from swimming pool" moron. But of course, they didn't. They sensationalized it because that's easier than spending three minutes googling the truth. Most of today's "journalists" can sucking cuck a fock, as far as I care.

    2. Re:Oh, very fning funny by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He's feeding into a belief. Anyone claiming to ahve this problem while knowing it's not possible is a much bigger jack-ass then people who ignorantly think this can be true.

      Of course, the biggest jack asses are the one where you show all the studies and the still refuse to change there minds.
      Did I say jackass? I meant moron.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Oh, very fning funny by Thaelon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Quick, put it on Snopes.com.

      It's the best we can do for now.

      --

      Question everything

  3. Re:would suck if someone somewhere was actually by adolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's attitudes like that which keep people reclusive when actually do experience strange things (whether medical, mental, metaphysical -- whatever strange means today).

    Some people are attention-whores, for sure. And some of those people make stuff up. The rest of the world, though - they'd probably rather keep their strangeness to themselves, than to be studied like a lab rat.

    You're talking about human beings, not creatures which we need to find in order to "be able to study them."

  4. Should be classified as fraud by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Misleading and deceiving people for notoriety and financial gain. How the fuck is this not fraud?

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Should be classified as fraud by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm. So if I have ads on my blog and I post "misleading and deceptive" blog posts that are "fun to read" or "sensational" (sounds like the mass media), is that fraud? Or how about advertising that implies "If you drink this, you'll get a girl like the one in this ad!"? ...

      Summary: I don't see this as being particularly any worse than most publicity. Heh, for that matter, all of Hollywood is misleading and deceptive for the sake of financial gain

  5. Re:would suck if someone somewhere was actually by 91degrees · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People do suffer from this affliction. The fact that it's actually a mental problem doesn't actually make it less of an affliction. Mental issues cause real world problems in much the same way as physical ones.

  6. Re:Tried before with success.. by ivan_w · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Awww.. come on !

    The dihydrogen monoxide/hydric acid/hydrane stunt was just *brilliant* !

    --Ivan

  7. Re:would suck if someone somewhere was actually by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Except they don't suffer from "this" affliction.
    If they can't pass a double blind test, then the affliction doesn't exist.

  8. Re:On the contrary by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He added cement to the idea.
    All this stuff, Bigfoot, UFO's, Homeopathy, reiki, only gets stronger when something like this happens. When it is proven to be fake, or shown that there is no evidence, it doesn't get reported in mainstream and when it does it gets put on page 8.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  9. Some legit studies have found effects by marcle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Check out this link: http://www.aehf.com/articles/em_sensitive.html Double-blind study with repeatable results, showed some subjects were sensitive. Remember, the scientific method means that nothing is ever proven definitively; all we can do is hypothesize, experiment, lather, rinse, repeat.

  10. the best we can do is ignore him from now on. by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...except the damage is done. The hippies and new-agers have already latched onto the story as yet more proof that WiFi is harmful and their neuroses are real.

    Stunts like this aren't 'harmless'. We should publicly flog him, not ignore him.

    --
    No sig today...
  11. The cure is easy... by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Put them in a room with a black WiFi box and ask them to tell you when it's switched on, preferably with some other "sensitives" as witnesses and making sure there's no cheating by the weasel-faced skeptics.

    Having shown them what a real experiment is, give them one to take home so they can try for themselves whenever they have doubts.

    After enough dismal failures they should get the message that it's all in their head.

    --
    No sig today...
  12. Re:Cellphone cancer risk by gnupun · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The slashdot title for this story is highly misleading: it's trying to insinuate all people complaining of Wi-Fi allergy are phonies just because some greedy joker pulled a stunt.

    Let's look at the facts:
    • Sticking your head or any body part in a microwave oven will severely injure or kill you -- microwave energy is highly dangerous.
    • Overuse of cellphones is likely to cause brain cancer after several years of use. Cellphones emit the same microwave radiation as the microwave oven, only with much diluted power, so it takes more time than an oven to damage human tissue.
    • Wi-fi also uses microwave radiation, except it's not stuck close to your head. But it's always on, depending on where you live or work. Even though the power of the radiation reaching the human body is weaker than a cellphone stuck to the head, wi-fi is always on while the cellphone is not -- the cumulative effects of this exposure is yet unknown.

    Looking at these facts, it's very likely that Wi-fi (microwave radiation) may cause cancer or some sort of damage if human beings are continuously exposed to it for several decades.

  13. What a logic by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Putting your head in a boiling pot of water or in a working oven is dangerous as well. Ergo standing several feet away from it is going to kill you as well... NO.

    The microwave kills you because it cooks you. In fact, you will be CURED of any cancer because cooked cancer cells are just as dead as anything else that is cooked.

    Guns kill, so carrying a gun gives you cancer because cancer is caused by lead and since guns kill with lead... BAD LOGIC.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.