Slashdot Mirror


Apple Keyboard Firmware Hack Demonstrated

Anonymouse writes with this excerpt from SemiAccurate: "Apple keyboards are vulnerable to a hack that puts keyloggers and malware directly into the device's firmware. This could be a serious problem, and now that the presentation and code (PDF) is out there, the bad guys will surely be exploiting it. The vulnerability was discovered by K. Chen, and he gave a talk on it at Black Hat this year (PDF). The concept is simple: a modern Apple keyboard has about 8K of flash memory, and 256 bytes of working RAM. For the intelligent, this is more than enough space to have a field day. ... The new firmware can do anything you want it to. Chen demonstrated code which, when you put in a password and hit return, starts playing back the last five characters typed in, LIFO. It is a rudimentary keylogger; a proof of concept more than anything else. Since there is about 1K of flash free in the keyboard itself, you can log quite a few keystrokes totally transparently."

5 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Huh?? by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does a keyboard even need flash in the first place? Being a keyboard isn't a complex job.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Huh?? by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure it's easier for me to get some code to run on your machine than it is for me to break into your house and install a logger inside your keyboard.

    2. Re:Huh?? by mattventura · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only possible reason I could think for someone doing this is because it would work cross-OS, and even on boot sequences before a normal keylogger would be activated, so you could do this to steal a disk encryption password.
      You could use it constructively, though. You could block the key sequences used to boot off a CD or external drive, which could actually be a useful feature for corporations or schools wanting to prevent booting from external media, since the other methods to prevent that don't work that well.

  2. Re:Physical access required by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And, as they say, physical access is root access. There are an unlimited number of ways someone could compromise your computer if they are given access to the hardware and firmware

    Only as long as they have a fair amount of time. The beauty of this hack is that you could set up a laptop so that any keyboards that get plugged into it are immediately infected. Then you only need a few seconds alone with the targets computer to unplug the keyboard, plug it into your laptop to infect it, then plug it back into the targets computer and leave. It minimizes the risk of being caught trying to do something more extensive to the system. You just walk into an unoccupied office and walk back out 30 seconds later knowing that the keylogger is installed, as opposed to spending 30 minutes in the office trying to reboot, get into the firmware, etc.

  3. Re:Physical access required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are people always so quick to dismiss the seriousness of low level exploits?

    Consider a Mac pool at a university. You unplug the keyboard, plug it into a small box with a USB host controller that you programmed to rewrite the keyboard firmware. Plug the keyboard back in, wait until someone else logs in. Then come back, open a text editor, type your secret trigger word, watch as the keyboard spits out the logged passwords.

    Consider a remote root exploit. That enables the hacker to reflash the firmware of an attached keyboard. Then the attacker can remove all traces of the hack from the target computer. The keyboard logs passwords and waits for a trigger word. How do you make someone type a strange word? Captcha. The attacker now has your password/passphrase (SSH login to your company's web server? Your online banking PIN? And the only trace is a modified firmware which nobody checks.