Slashdot Mirror


Nissan Unveils All-Electric LEAF

MojoRilla writes "In Japan, Nissan unveiled their all-electric LEAF (press release, and Flash site). Slated to launch in late 2010 in Japan, the US, and Europe, this car will have a 100-mile range, seats 5, has an advanced computer system with remote control by IPhone, and promises to be competitively priced. While this car's range won't work for everyone, it could be a game changer as a commuter car." Recharge time is 8 hours with a 200-volt power source, and "just under 30 minutes with a quick charger" (no further details given) to charge to 80% of capacity.

27 of 586 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing to see here, move along... by Fishmoney · · Score: 4, Informative

    From TFA: "An iPhone application allows for remote monitoring of battery levels and control of air conditioning in electric cars"

    1. Re:Nothing to see here, move along... by TinBromide · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, I was expecting the more recent pierce brosnan bond type cell phone remote, not this "Oh, my car has finished charging, I can leave this god-awful mall" type app. At least give me something that will use gps that I can log into and use as a lo-jack so my iphone can point me to my car in a big big parking lot.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
  2. Before anyone panics by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "remote control" just lets you check if it's charged, and lets you start the AC/heat early to get the cabin comfortable while it's still plugged in.

    1. Re:Before anyone panics by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Informative

      "You aren't going fucking anywhere, dude"

      Actually, I think that an application that monitors your car's battery/fuel/power source and is linked to a GPS with a trip planner saying "Hey, you won't get there with your current battery/fuel/etc level, you need to get more juice" would be fricken useful.

      I recently did a trip through Wales with mates in a car with a nice GPS, but when you plan a trip that's longer than your car's fuel tank, having it add a "refuel your car here, take this exit off the freeway" sort of show would be REALLY handy.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    2. Re:Before anyone panics by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm starting a company to do just that -- Celadon Applications, LLC. We already have a fully functional prototype and are in the middle of raising money to add some more features and polish to make it into a commercial product (the prototype is a bit cluttered and could use to be more user-friendly). The prototype makes use of weather forecasts, 10-meter altitude data with a vertical resolution of 4 inches, and so forth, along with driver behavior modeling and physics calculations every several meters to determine how much charge you'll have at each point along the trip. The final version will have a very powerful crowd-sourced, trust network-validated charger database overlay on the map as well (it's coded, but is currently being debugged). So you find your route won't make it to your destination, no problem -- you drag it over to a charging station. And you can click on the station, get pictures, reviews, find what there is to do in the area, etc. It'll initially be populated with not just "known" recharging stations, but also "likely" recharging places, such as RV parks and so forth -- as well as phone numbers and email addresses to contact their owners. And you can add your own charging stations, even just a high-power outlet in your garage -- and list a fee for it if you want.

      We've done some accuracy validation on the simulator part with a Tesla Roadster. Of 7-ish legs that we tested, all but one of them were in the 2-4% error range. The last one was on surface streets and was about 12% error because Google was way off on how much traffic there was going to be (they said 40 minutes, it actually took closer to 25); when we hard-coded it to get the amount of traffic right, it fell back into the normal error range. To counter that issue, we're going to add real-time traffic forecasts in wherever available. Oh, and this is so far without any of Tesla's help. If we can get more detailed hardware specs, we can do even better.

      The market forecasts range wildly, but they range from a million or two EVs up to 32.7 million shipped by 2015 (Wintergreen Research). Either way, it's a massive market, and even with just a couple percent penetration, there's huge profit potential and the potential to create a lot of jobs. And it should help open up the EV market to a lot of people who wouldn't otherwise consider them. And most of our competition is way behind -- the standard approach, you'll find, is just to draw a circle around the car and say this is how far you can drive (as though you can go just as far over the top of Mount Whitney as you can over flat land on good roads).

      --
      Aeris Died For Your Sins.
    3. Re:Before anyone panics by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

      The prototype makes use of weather forecasts, 10-meter altitude data with a vertical resolution of 4 inches

      You are so doomed...

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  3. 100 miles with or without A/C? by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In a slowly-moving traffic, a running A/C will really eat into battery life... Somebody working, say, 40 miles from home — not that unusual — will need the charge to last 80 miles plus whatever extra for the air conditioning... Depending on how hot it is, they may or may not be able to pick kids from school on the way home...

    Unless it is really cheap, I don't see, why many people would rush to buy it. "Normal" cars last about 300 miles and can be "recharged" (to 100%) in 3 minutes, instead of 80% in 30...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:100 miles with or without A/C? by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't see, why many people would rush to buy it.

      The millions of people who have short commutes who live in urban areas would do just fine with a car like this and many people like the idea of not just driving without relying on oil, but also not contributing to their city's level of smog.

      I just wish I knew how much this thing costs.

    2. Re:100 miles with or without A/C? by KaiLoi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Idling? Dude.. it's an ELECTRIC CAR! The engine doesn't "turn over" when you're not moving. Charge is used when you move, an/if you're running internal electronics (air con etc) if you're in a traffic jam.. just turn it off. It's not like you have to "re-start the engine" when it's time to move.

    3. Re:100 miles with or without A/C? by Chad+Lester · · Score: 5, Informative

      Please - just because this is useless to you, doesn't mean it's useless.

      Americans on average have 2.28 cars per household. The majority have a garage and can easily plug the thing in.

      The average driver drives 15,000 per year. Most days have a predictable amount of driving that will be well under the 100 mile range.

      At $30,000, this car will be cheap to operate over the life of the vehicle. No oil change, simple transmission, no coolant. Inexpensive energy.

      Having friends who already own electric cars - I can tell you that the joy of having your car "full" every morning is wonderful. No more unplanned trips to the gas station. It's hard to state how fantastic this is.

      Imagine if you had to take your cellphone to the mobile phone store a couple times per week to "fill" it up. We tolerate that with cars because that's what we're used to.

      As a 5 seater hatchback, I can drive the kids to school, commute and get groceries. With 100 mile range, I can drive up to wine country for the weekend. Sure, I'll have another vehicle to tow my boat and drive into the mountains. But this car sounds fantastic and will handle 95% of my trips. If they build it, I will definitely buy one.

      But I guess I'll be the only one, since it's "useless"

  4. This just in by kpainter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple's iTunes app store bans Nissan's iPhone application allows for remote monitoring of battery levels and control of air conditioning in electric cars.

  5. Let's remember a few things for this discussion: by copponex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1) There is already enough juice in the grid at night to power 80% of the 220 million cars without any further need for more power plants. (According to the DoE).

    2) The average commute for people is far less than 100 miles, which means the only thing you could be missing out on is a truck for hauling or a car for road trip vacations.

    Now, the price hasn't been released. If it's under 30K, it's a winner. As the summary said, there's no details on the charge, but as long as I can plug it in at night and it's charged in the morning, it will not only save me gas, but I don't have to bother with filling up.

  6. sign me up! by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Interesting



    If this car is less than $22k, I will buy one day-of-release. TFPR does not provide an MSRP, but it does say it will be low-priced. Four doors, and your gas bill gets moved over to your house electric bill. I never drive more than 100 miles in a day, so it would be perfect for getting me around town on all my stop-start errands.

    Moving the cost of driving from a fuel purchase tracked with credit card might make it more difficult for people to get reimbursed by their company for business driving. I wonder how that's going to get sorted. Also, in a roommate situation, it becomes a little unfair to evenly split the electric bill if only one tennant is charging a car.

    Looks cool.

    Seth

  7. Re:Let's remember a few things for this discussion by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hm, but how many people drive with no electronics? No AC, no heat, etc? A 30-40 mile commute isn't unheard of (in fact its very typical) where I live, and it tends to be very hot in the summer and very cold in the winter, so that is 60-80 miles both ways, every day. Lets mix in the fact that heat (has to be electric thus running down the battery) or AC (also electric) is going to without a doubt cut down on the battery's life, making it uncertain if you can make it any other place (such as to pick up your kids, run and grab some groceries, etc) without taking it home to charge. However, what I think is the worst part about electric vehicles is there is no easy way to get started if you get stranded. Its happened to all of us, either you forgot to get gas, or the gas gauge was inaccurate, but you run out of gas. Most of the time its not a huge problem. Just call up someone and have them bring a bit of gas to make it to the next gas station, but how are you going to move that electric car? Its unfeasible to just call up someone to lug 100 pounds + of batteries to you, and solar just isn't efficient/fast enough to charge it.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  8. Re:History by David+Greene · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Volt is not a BEV, it is an EREV. That is, the Volt is a plug-in series hybrid that uses a small gas engine to drive the electrical system (somewhat like a diesel-electric locomotive except with gasoline). The goal is to run all-electric for 40 miles (covering 75% of commuters) and kick in the gas engine when the battery gets low enough.

    And it appears to be on schedule for 2010. More info here and here.

    --

  9. Re:Where's the Outlet? by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not everyone owns a swimming pool.. are you suggesting people should stop making diving boards?

    Not everything is about you.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  10. Just think if it was remote control by Kindle by countertrolling · · Score: 5, Funny

    It could make the car disappear. Parking problem, solved

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  11. Re:WORTHLESS by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Two Nissan LEAF cars + duct tape = 320km range.

    I like your idea!

  12. on the road charging? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was wondering if I could do the same thing I have for camping trips. I have a front and rear receiver hitch, and a 220V generator on a mount that slides into the receiver hitch. It's 5 hp, and runs a RV air conditioner for 5 hours on under 5 gallons, I am sure you could do a better generator mount than this guy if we get a hitch mount, and just plug the car charger into it for road trips, ditch the weight for in town. Hopefully the chargers aren't locked out while moving. Not only does the GEN not have to meet as many emissions standards ( = cheaper) but has other uses also.

    1. Re:on the road charging? by scotch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not only does the GEN not have to meet as many emissions standards

      That's the spirit!!

      --
      XML causes global warming.
  13. Re:Let's remember a few things for this discussion by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's remember some other things that I think are relevant to the discussion. Or really just one thing: Amdahl's law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl's_law, which I think is woefully ignored in the green-car world. As an result-oriented environmentalist, this disappoints me immensely.

    In short, Amdahl's law says that when you want to improve a system that is made up of lots of different components, you do best to improve the lowest-performing part first. In programming, that means focusing your performance analysis on the parts of the program that are taking the most time before you focus on making the fast parts faster. In terms of automobiles, that means you should replace the most fuel-guzzling part of the fleet before you start thinking about making the thrifty cars thriftier.

    Let's do some numbers, for the same number of miles driven, replacing a 12 mpg vehicle with a 15 mpg vehicle saves you as much as replacing a 30 MPG vehicle with a 60 MPG vehicle. Improve that 12 mpg to 18 mpg and now you need to replace a 30 mpg with a 180 MPG car (the EPA calculates the carbon-cost of an electric vehicle using our mix of power source to be roughly 120 mpg) to match the fuel savings.

    So if we were really serious about making a dent in oil consumption and CO2, we would be pushing for more fuel-efficient pickup trucks, cargo vans and SUVs instead of this inane (but highly press-friendly!) pursuit of ever-more-efficient small vehicles. The people that drive those vehicles can't or won't replace them with small cars no matter how efficient.

    Ultimately, it comes down to whether we value results or whether we value cool technology. As a gadget-nerd, I freely admit that all-electric cars are much sexier than a new pickup truck that gets 16 mpg instead of 12. But the programmer inside me knows that the pickup truck will probably do a lot more good over the lifetime of the vehicle. There are only so many R&D dollars going around and I feel like they aren't being well spent (from the point of view of the environment -- for marketing, the halo effect of the Prius is definitely worth it).

  14. Re:Let's remember a few things for this discussion by copponex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The metered outlets will be installed by a third party and offered as an amenity. It's just like when internet started in apartments first. You install one EV Charge Parking Spot, and you have ten times as many potential customers driving by it every day.

    Again, once there's an inexpensive, safe, reliable EV that goes 100 miles on a single charge, all other problems become trivial to solve.

  15. City states by flyingfsck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are places in the world that are literally just a single city, with nowhere else to go: Singapore, Dubai, Hong Kong, Monaco, Windhoek and many little islands. Those could make good use of these type of cars.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  16. Re:Let's remember a few things for this discussion by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously... is everyone in America a "can't do" blowhard these days?

    An auto manufacturer from Japan just did what American companies said was impossible, and has built a 5 seater EV with a 100 mile range with today's technology.. and the problem will be running some goddamn conduit and 220V?

    ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS?

  17. Re:Doomed. by copponex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, given the choice between saving thousands dollars a year on gasoline and maintenance, or renting a car for the entire week you get for vacation and the few weekends you can get out of town, you'll pick the more expensive option?

    You said this car was "doomed" because it doesn't work for anyone, which is complete nonsense. For many people I know, who nearly always travel to their vacation via airplane, and who rarely leave town on the weekends, a cheap electric plus an occasional rental is the most economic option. And most people live in cities, not out in the sticks.

    If you regularly leave on the weekends and you can only afford one car, then go with an ICE. If you live in the sticks, get an ICE. Otherwise, if you do the math, this is the way to go.

  18. Got one by protonbishop · · Score: 5, Interesting
    not a Leaf, but Toyota's Rav4EV. BEV, 100miles/charge, been driving it since 2002. Seats 4, not 5 & we have a Palm app, not iPhone app. I don't have a fast charge option, so that's cool. One hopes "state of the art" exceeds what Toyota did nearly ten years ago:
    • Air Conditioning "costs" 5 miles per hour of use. Heat costs only a little less than that (No internal combustion engine generating heat, ya know).
    • Bumper-to-bumper traffic isn't a problem: Car uses nearly zero at 'idle'. The worry I have is an unexpected detour which adds 20 miles.
    • Heated windshield costs a few miles per hour of use. Lights, radio, heated seats are nearly free.
    • The "100 miles on a charge claim" corresponds in the real world to driving consistently at about 65 mph, or mixed city/highway driving. Driving at 75 mph decreases distance by ~10%. Driving at 55mph would yield > 100 miles. Driving at 35 mph (constant) would probably yield a +30% distance gain. City driving results in lots of braking & though regenerative, there is loss, so consider 90 miles in the city.
    • On low battery, the car goes into a special "turtle" mode whereby one cannot drive quickly. I've driven an extra 20 miles at about 15 mph in this mode after the gauges registered zero. Was unable to drain the batteries because I got bored trying.

    Sure, I use another car for driving vacations, but these battery electric cars are perfect for some of us.

  19. Re:Let's remember a few things for this discussion by subreality · · Score: 4, Informative

    AC (also electric) is going to without a doubt cut down on the battery's life

    Actually, not that much, unless you drive *really* slowly. The LEAF will have a 24 kW-h battery. The motor gets .24 kW-h/mile[1], and assuming you average 30 mph[2], the AC draws .75kW[3], and you use it 100% of the time, we have (x is hours drive time):

    24 kW-h = 30 * .24 * x + .75 * x
    [algebra happens]
    x =~ 3.0

    30mph * 3.0 hours = 90 miles, a 10% hit to overall range.

    If they use the AC system as a heat pump instead of a resistive array, range on full heat will be about the same.

    Just call up someone and have them bring a bit of gas to make it to the next gas station, but how are you going to move that electric car?

    And then, the next gas crunch hits. Everyone's gonna be calling me up to borrow my electric vehicle, but how are you going to move that gas-powered car?

    I give a decent percentage chance of this actually occurring for some reason in a closer timeframe than my mean-time-to-oops-dry-tank, which is currently measured in decades.

    [1] 100 mile range / 24 kW-h battery
    [2] With a crappy 1 hour, 30 mile commute, where you spend good chunk of time cruising the freeway followed by some traffic lights when you get to the city
    [3] The amount a 8200 BTU/h window-type air conditioner pulls, which is a reasonable comparable for this size car.