Slashdot Mirror


RadioShack To Rebrand As "The Shack"?

Harry writes "Rumor has it that RadioShack is planning to re-brand itself as The Shack later this year, after eighty-eight years under the old name (most of them with a space in between 'Radio' and 'Shack'). I hope it's not true, because I don't think the move would do a thing to make the retailer a better, more successful business." Where will we go to buy soldering irons and those RCA to headphone jack adapters now?

11 of 629 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Back in the day... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Informative

    I used to buy parts 'at the last minute' at the rat shack. now, I don't even bother looking anymore and instead just hit up the only valid mailorder places left: digikey, mouser, newark are the big 3.

    their parts are cheap enough, they work, they web ordering works and the selection is world class (literally, many people across the world order parts FROM the US distributors and even pay VAT/customs to receive the pkg).

    I go into a rat shack and I see candy, cellphones and an ever dwindling parts selection.

    they don't even carry x10 powerline remote stuff anymore (that used to be a stable at the shack).

    I might as well turn in my radio shack battery club card:

    http://www.antiqueradios.com/gallery/v/temp/battofmonth2.jpg.html

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  2. Re:Beware of namechanges by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Informative

    They rebranded it from "Radio Shack" to "The Source" in Canada years and years ago. But everyone I know still refers to it as "Radio Shack". I can't even remember the name "The Source" well enough to tell someone how to find the place... I had to check online before I made this post.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  3. Re:Beware of namechanges by Canazza · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's been called Nesquik everywhere but the US, Canada, Mexico and Australia since the 1950s, the name was changed to "Nesquik" in 1999 in those countries.

    Unlike Opal Fruits, which were introduced as Starburst in the US in the 1970's and then had the brand changed everywhere else

    --
    It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
  4. For those with an historical bent by dtmos · · Score: 5, Informative

    The term "radio shack" was coined in the early 20th Century, when shipping companies began to add radio to their vessels. Since the ships were already built, the extra room for the radio equipment had to be added -- there was typically no existing space with both access to the antenna (i.e., above deck) and the necessary electrical power from the ship's plant. (The audible noise from the spark equipment of the day also meant that the equipment, which was used largely at night, couldn't be placed near the officers' sleeping quarters.) Paid for out of operating expenses by the frugal shipowners, these added rooms were typically small and poorly constructed, often from wood, and the term "radio shack" quickly followed.

    New ship construction, of course, included a purpose-built room for the radio equipment, still called the "radio shack." Even the Queen Elizabeth 2 has a radio shack. The term quickly moved ashore -- amateur radio stations are in shacks, for example -- and "radio shack" came to mean the place where all the equipment was. From there, commercial use soon followed.

  5. Re:Surveillance by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Informative

    A year from now, I predict 'The Shack' will be liquidating assets under Chapter 11. Anyone wanna take that bet? It would be smarter than buying Radio Shack stock.

    Bad prediction. Against all odds and logic, the company is reasonably profitable.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  6. Radioshack is profitable by EsJay · · Score: 5, Informative
    While you are all spelling out exactly why RadioShack can't succeed (they don't stock flux capacitors!!!), the company is busy making money. They were in the black last year, too.

    Ft Worth Business Press - August 03, 2009 - [RadioShack] posted an about 18 percent increase in net income over second quarter 2008's $41.4 million, according to the financial statement. During the quarter, the company also posted cash and cash equivalents of $931 million, compared with $578 million last year, and inventories of $578 million, about $41 million less than the same quarter last year.

  7. Re:How do they stay in business? by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Informative

    1) The workers make minimum wage plus commission.
    2) They specialize in items with a high profit margin. And then they mark them up.
    3) They attach themselves to "hot items" that suddenly everyone needs. Most recent example: digital converter boxes have been huge business.
    4) They cut costs like crazy. The CEO famously sold off all their plants to employees to save them money on maintaining them. Et cetera.
    5) They're everywhere, they're convenient. If you need something specific and relatively common, chances are the RadioShack is closer to where you live and small enough that, unlike, say, Fry's, you don't have to wander around a big box for 30 minutes.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  8. Re:Surveillance by Ephemeriis · · Score: 5, Informative

    A very unusual project at work required me to make a mono audio jack to RJ11 cable.

    My first thought was 'Radio Shack.' I'm digging through the drawers of connectors and the salesman came over and asked if I needed any help. (I was the only one in the store, he was probably bored.) I explained the project and got a blank stare.

    I wanted to hook up my laptop's S-Video to my TV's RCA video.

    I know such cables and adapters exist, I've used them before and seen them online for just a few dollars. But I didn't have any handy, and didn't want to wait for something to ship. I figured Radio Shack would have what I needed.

    My wife and I were the only customers there, so the sales people kept hovering around. I shoo'ed them away a couple times, but I was having a genuinely difficult time locating the part. Eventually I got tired of them asking to help me and I told them what I was looking for.

    One of them gave me a blank look, the other one looked amused. He then carefully explained that there was no such simple adapter and that I'd have to purchase some kind of RF converter box. He showed me a device with inputs for everything under the sun... S-Video, RCA, component... And outputs in RCA and coax. The box cost around $100.

    I noticed right next to this RF converter box an S-Video to RCA cable. Exactly what I'd been looking for. Except that it was about 10 feet long and gold plated. The cable itself was $30 or so.

    I didn't buy either item at Radio Shack. I went to WalMart instead. Found a little adapter for $2 and a 5 foot cable for $7 or so. Spent about $10 total and it works great.

    That was the last time I went to Radio Shack.

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  9. Re:Beware of namechanges by j1ggy · · Score: 5, Informative

    They were forced to because Circuit City swallowed up all of RadioShack's assets in Canada. They were no longer allowed to use the name as they are two competing companies. I believe the official name is "The Source by Circuit City". Instead of carrying the RadioShack brand of products in their stores, you'll find mostly Nexxtech stamped all over everything now.

  10. Re:Beware of namechanges by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to snopes, it was because they didn't want to have to pay licensing fees to the commonwealth of Kentucky for using the word Kentucky.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  11. Re:Beware of namechanges by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Informative

    When they started selling phones? Really? Not when they started hawking generic electronics and speakers at premium prices under the Optimus brand? Or when they tried to sell you a Tandy every time you stepped through the door?

    To be fair, electronic component sales really aren't a viable market anymore. With the price of production shrinking just as fast as the size of transistors, we've long since entered the world of disposable electronics, where it's cheaper to design and manufacture products to be replaced in their entirety than to be repairable. Surface mount technology was pretty much the death knell for that. Sure, there are exceptions, and I probably do more electronic repairs than most people, but it's still a rare event. I recognize that our hobby/habit is becoming more and more of a rarity, and on modern electronics, the only *technician* serviceable parts are basically connectors and buttons/switches. It's not like you can even get schematics for most electronics these days, so unless you know for a fact that you just broke off a SMC, and what its value was, you're probably never going to find the fault. I've even seen boards straight from the manufacturer with components broken off or leads clipped to correct design flaws, so you can't rely on sight alone.

    When it comes down to it, people would rather just get a new device than pay someone half the replacement price, and in most cases more than the market value of the old one. Desktop computers are about the only exception, but even then you're usually swapping out boards rather than performing component-level repairs. When I bent the pins on my LGA 775 socket, for example, the entire motherboard was a wash. It would have cost $25 just for the part from my wholesaler after discount, and hours of tedium to manually resolder 775 pins, IF I could even pull it off without creating a short or melting a trace. And I certainly didn't want to risk a $100 used CPU in a home-soldered socket, let alone the brand new $500 CPU I was replacing it with. Better to just run out and get a new motherboard for $100, and the peace of mind that comes with it.