Slashdot Mirror


Prehistoric Gene Reawakened To Battle HIV

Linuss points out research published in PLoS Biology that demonstrates the reawakening of latent human cells' ability to manufacture an HIV defense. A group of scientists led by Nitya Venkataraman began with the knowledge that Old World monkeys have a built-in immunity to HIV: a protein that can prevent HIV from entering cell walls and starting an infection. They examined the human genome for any evidence of a latent gene that could manufacture such a protein, and found the capability in a stretch of what has been dismissively termed "junk DNA." "In this work, we reveal that, upon correction of the premature termination codon in theta-defensin pseudogenes, human myeloid cells produce cyclic, antiviral peptides (which we have termed 'retrocyclins'), indicating that the cells retain the intact machinery to make cyclic peptides. Furthermore, we exploited the ability of aminoglycoside antibiotics to read-through the premature termination codon within retrocyclin transcripts to produce functional peptides that are active against HIV-1. Given that the endogenous production of retrocyclins could also be restored in human cervicovaginal tissues, we propose that aminoglycoside-based topical microbicides might be useful in preventing sexual transmission of HIV-1."

26 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. Prehistoric? by ringbarer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Praise Raptor Jesus!

    --
    "Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
    1. Re:Prehistoric? by robotkid · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's better than that! It's a premature stop codon, which basically means someone inserted a semicolon the middle of a line of previously functional expression (but hey, it still compiles!). And if you can decipher what the comments mean, free trip to Stockholm!

    2. Re:Prehistoric? by Jonny_eh · · Score: 5, Funny

      But a good compiler would've seen it was useless code and removed it. God needs to upgrade to gcc 4.3.3

  2. Prehistoric Gene FTW! by Snotman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    AIDS is pwned. Good for us and our "junk" DNA. One man's junk is another man's treasure!

    1. Re:Prehistoric Gene FTW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just don't stick your junk in the wrong treasure and you'll be fine.

    2. Re:Prehistoric Gene FTW! by kalirion · · Score: 5, Funny

      One man's junk is another man's treasure!

      I'll just treasure my own junk, thank you very much.

    3. Re:Prehistoric Gene FTW! by TheTick21 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're posting on /.

      It goes without saying that you're the only one to treasure your junk.

    4. Re:Prehistoric Gene FTW! by bgillespie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yarr... Indeed, but don't forget to mention cursed booty.

    5. Re:Prehistoric Gene FTW! by Garbad+Ropedink · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unfortunately no. By using the 'pwned' in reference to a potentially major scientific breakthrough you've actually made AIDS mutate to become airborne and highly contagious.

      It's called the 'Nantucket Principle'. Where using idiotic phrases in reference to intelligent work causes the work to be destroyed.

      Another case of this principle at work was when the Wright brothers tried their first airplane prototype. Just before they were going to do their first test flight Orville said something to the effect of 'We are going to codfloddle this strumpet!' which caused Bernoulli's principle to completely change, setting flight back many years.

      So you have to watch it.

      --
      And that was the last Terry Fox run I ever participated in.
    6. Re:Prehistoric Gene FTW! by icebike · · Score: 5, Informative

      Junk DNA is one of the greatest misnomers in genetics. It basically arose because people didn't understand the purpose of a particular gene, or they found (as in this case) that a sequence was prematurely terminated due to an encoding error, which could only be detected via comparison to another working copy from another source.

      This opens up a new field of bug detection: looking for broken code, figuring out what patch is needed and then figuring out what you could do with the repaired gene. This is going to call for vast amounts of computer simulations.

      In this case we were led to a solution to the breakage by a similar gene in another species. But there must be millions of broken genes laying about that might re-enable some traits, anything from gills to the ability to smell tyrannosaur breath. (Pedants: Look, its a joke, please don't bother pointing out the time line here, Ok?).

      There seems a tendency to assume all "lost things", (genes, knowledge, secrets of the universe, methods of building pyramids, etc) are of immense value, and far superior to knowledge we have today. (Slashdotters will surely have a term for this.) Not everything lost is desirable. This is one example that may well be.

      Many species might be expected to genetically re-energize, by natural means, any lost protection in the face of a re-appearing threat. That might take eons. If this discovery leads to a treatment, it will be signal the dawn of genetic dumpster diving on a huge scale.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  3. The Dilemma by geegel · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know what's scarier: the fact that a story with this sort of language made it to the front page or the fact that I understood it completely.

    --
    right...
    1. Re:The Dilemma by Muad'Dave · · Score: 5, Funny

      So they uncommented the gene in 'DNA.xml', and modified its XSL 'DNA2Cell.xsl' so that it would parse again?

      How cool is that?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    2. Re:The Dilemma by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Informative

      Can you make an analogy involving cars? That would be usefull to many people here.

      They've finally found a use for the tail fins on a 1962 Impala. Now they're looking in junk yards to find some good copies of them and plan to weld them on to next year's Prius.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:The Dilemma by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Informative?

      We're doomed...

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:The Dilemma by SBrach · · Score: 5, Informative

      I didn't understand it but it was the only word I was interested in enough to google.

  4. I do that all the time by TheTick21 · · Score: 5, Funny

    /* This code commented out because I'm sure they're going to change their mind and I don't want to redo all the work. */

  5. Turning on Monkey DNA? by turthalion · · Score: 5, Funny

    So how long till we're all having hot monkey sex with each other? Count me out of turning on any monkey genes in *my* DNA, thank you.

    I've seen this episode of ST:TNG, so I *know* how this is all going to end.

    --
    Michael Coyne
    http://turthalion.blogspot.com
  6. Translation (I think) by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We reactivated this gene in the lab, and it seemed to work. There's a type of antibiotic that seems to reactivate the gene as well. So applying the antibiotic topically (read "like spermicidal foam/gel) should reactivate the gene in a woman's naughtybits and so fight the virus.

    Focused on the woman - good idea. But how does science focus on the man? How about "STOP FUCKING PEOPLE WHO AREN'T YOUR WIFE/GIRLFRIED/SIGNIFIGANT OTHER!"

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Translation (I think) by Krneki · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Men were not made for monogamy, your stupid culture made you believe so.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  7. Only side effect by xednieht · · Score: 5, Funny

    Minor side effect of re-activating the sequence - you become very hairy, lose the ability to walk upright, and have a curious craving to pick through other's hair in search of lice.

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
    1. Re:Only side effect by pandrijeczko · · Score: 5, Funny

      I see that you've been to a Metallica concert then?

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  8. Re:This is good news by pauljlucas · · Score: 5, Informative

    We still have a lot of our DNA not yet "activated" ...

    If we have it, it must have evolved for a reason. Currently inactive DNA was active in the past. There's just no evolutionary pressure for it to be removed, so it sticks around.

    [E]very living organism share [sic] more or less the same DNA with less than 1% of differences ...

    Nope: We have a greater-than-1% difference with chimps, our closest living relatives. The Amoeba dubia has more than 200 times the amount of DNA than humans.

    --
    If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  9. Not surprised by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems to me that we carry a "catalog" of genes that are not currently useful, but have been useful in the past. It's not as if evolution destroys genes - for the most part it tends to make them inactive.

  10. Re:Old world monkey by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Informative
    New World = America (north and south, not states).

    Old World = Africa, Europe, Asia

    New WOrld Monkeys are those found in the Americas.

    Old World Monkeys are those found in Africa/Europe/Asia

    Specifically, Babboons, Colobus, etc.

    Old world monkeys usually have tails, but unlike the New World Monkeys, their tails are NOT prehensile (i.e. they can't use them like a tentacle).

    P.S. Wikipedia is your friend.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  11. Curing HIV is so easy by JoshDM · · Score: 5, Funny

    a caveman could do it.

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion