Slashdot Mirror


Linux-Friendly, Internet-Enabled HDTVs?

mrchaotica writes "I'm in the market for a new HDTV (in the $1200-or-slightly-more range, as I won the extended-service-plan lottery and have a Sears store credit). Several of the TVs I've looked at have various 'Internet TV' features (here are Samsung's and Panasonic's). Some manufacturers appear to be rolling their own, while others are partnering with Yahoo (maybe in an attempt to create a 'standard?'). Moreover, these TVs also tend to run Linux under the hood (although their GPL compliance, such as in Panasonic's case, may leave something to be desired). Finally, it's easy to imagine these TVs being able to support video streaming services (YouTube, Netflix, Amazon, etc.) without a set-top box, but I don't know the extent to which that support actually exists. Here are my questions: 1) Is this 'Internet TV' thing going to be a big deal going forward, or just a gimmick? 2) Which manufacturers are most [open standard|Linux|hacker]-friendly? 3) Which TV models have the best support (or best potential and community backing) for this sort of thing?"

5 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. Youtube on your TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The quality would be so bad at that size, would you even want to watch?

    1. Re:Youtube on your TV? by amRadioHed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It can also play media from any computer on the home network, except from Linux boxes (windows only).

      Except for Linux and except for Macs? By what strange definition does that qualify as any computer on your home network? Pretty weak if they can't actually stream from any computer, it's not that hard to do.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  2. Whatever happened to... by TheGreenNuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    just using the PC input most HDTV ship with? That way you get your full blown computer running whatever "[open standard|Linux|hacker]-friendly" system you want.

  3. everything changes by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You prediction was made in much simpler terms years ago, and so far it seems to be coming true: Everything that has traditionally been sent by wires will be transmitted wirelessly, everything that has traditionally been sent wirelessly will be sent by wire. Ham radio doomed itself years ago when the old farts in the ARRL insisted that morse code be kept as a requirement for most licenses, and any license that had good range without using satellites. Of course, many of them quit using morse right after they got their license. But they still insisted that new hams learn it (and using a computer that could send and receive code wasn't an acceptable option, perhaps because the ARRL couldn't sell computers training materials). Now the code requirement has finally been dropped, but too little too late. Many of us who would have gladly worked for General or advanced "tickets" decades ago were blocked out by the asinine requirement, even after all other radio services completely abandoned the code. Now there seems little reason to get the equipment that has continued to spiral in price, particularly when the Internet and other services have made ham almost obsolete. Yes, it still comes in very handy in emergency situations when other forms of communication break down, but it's utility is greatly diminished by having driven away many potential members of the ham community.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  4. Re:Its called Windows 7 Ultimate by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since Windows 7 Ultimate would probably cost more than the TV, I'll stick with Linux thanks.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!