NASA's Cashflow Problem Puts Moon Trip In Doubt

krou writes "According to the Guardian, the Augustine panel is going to declare that there is simply no money to go back to the moon, and the next-generation Ares I rocket is likely to be scrapped unless there is more funding. The $81B Constellation Program's long-term goal of putting a human on Mars is almost certainly not going to be possible by the middle of the century. The options outlined by the panel for the future of NASA 'are to extend the working life of the aging space shuttle fleet beyond next year's scheduled retirement until 2015, while developing a cheaper transport to the moon; pressing ahead with Constellation as quickly as existing funding allows; or creating a new, larger rocket that would allow exploration of the solar system while bypassing the moon.' All of this means that NASA won't be back on the moon before the end of the next decade as hoped, 'or even leaving lower Earth orbit for at least another two decades.' Another result of the monetary black hole is that they don't have the '$300m to expand a network of telescopes and meet the government's target of identifying, by 2020, at least 90% of the giant space rocks that pose a threat to Earth.'"

Comments

How can the federal deficit be blamed?

[Shivetya]

Because it certainly has not had any impact on the orgy of irresponsible spending of President Obama and his fellow Democrats.

Face it, it isn't because we "DON'T" have the money its because NASA != votes.

Please don't toss out "Iraq". That old throw away line was childish during Bush's years and just as tired now. Iraq had no bearing either.

Just note it as, NASA != Votes.

It is no more difficult than that. There is no conspiracy. This not because of Iraq/Afghanistan. This is not because of a bloated defense budget. It simply is because NASA does not generate votes or control and as such does not qualify for a President or Congress not interested in science. Please don't confuse a President who TALKS about being for science, just understand the science politicians support is the science that polls well.