Slashdot Mirror


Army Asks Its Personnel to Wikify Field Manuals

Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times reports that the Army began encouraging its personnel — from the privates to the generals — to go online and collaboratively rewrite seven of the field manuals that give instructions on all aspects of Army life, using the same software behind Wikipedia. The goal, say the officers behind the effort, is to tap more experience and advice from battle-tested soldiers rather than relying on the specialists within the Army's array of colleges and research centers, who have traditionally written the manuals. 'For a couple hundred years, the Army has been writing doctrine in a particular way, and for a couple months, we have been doing it online in this wiki,' said Col. Charles J. Burnett, the director of the Army's Battle Command Knowledge System. 'The only ones who could write doctrine were the select few. Now, imagine the challenge in accepting that anybody can go on the wiki and make a change — that is a big challenge, culturally.' Under the three-month pilot program, the current version of each guide can be edited by anyone around the world who has been issued an ID card that allows access to the Army Internet system. Reaction so far from the rank and file has been tepid, but the brass is optimistic; even in an open-source world, soldiers still know how to take an order."

10 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Check please by Wowsers · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wiki entry:

    In case you come under attack, shoot back. [clarification needed]

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
    1. Re:Check please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't you mean [citation needed]? Seems pretty clear to me already... :)

      Wiki entry:

      In case you come under attack, shoot back. [clarification needed]

      I read those instructions as a free pass to be a team-killing bastard.

  2. Wow by wb8wsf · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is absolutely one of the most intelligent things I have ever heard
    of the US armed forces doing.

    Well, that and letting Haynes design T-shirts, and letting go of the 20+
    page specifications for fruitcakes.

  3. In other new. by Steauengeglase · · Score: 2, Funny

    Standard SOP for solid waste burning is SERGEANT MAJOR IS A COCK SUCKER!

    1. Re:In other new. by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Standard SOP for solid waste burning is SERGEANT MAJOR IS A COCK SUCKER!

      [citation needed]

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:In other new. by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Standard SOP for solid waste burning is SERGEANT MAJOR IS A COCK SUCKER!

      [citation needed]

      That sounds like original research to me. Umm... How was it?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  4. Wikiality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news, Stephen Colbert is now commander-in-chief of US forces in the middle east, and the number of elephant attacks has tripled in the last 6 months.

  5. oooooohhh... by sootman · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... prepare for edit wars unlike any you've ever seen before.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  6. Re:Hurry up and mod me down biatch! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it my imagination or have there been far more racist trolls on /. since Obama got elected?

    No, it's actually Obama posting these things to try to make racists look bad.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  7. Re:This is a good idea by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder how far they'll go along the "no original research" route?

    "Guns fire bullets.[citation needed]"

    --
    "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."