Slashdot Mirror


English Wikipedia Reaches 3 Million Articles

FunPika writes "It has taken more than eight years and the work of vast numbers of people around the world, but the English version of Wikipedia has finally amassed more than three million articles. The site broke through the 3 million barrier early on Monday morning UK time, with the honors taken by a short article about Norwegian actor Beate Eriksen — a 48-year-old cast member of a popular local soap opera."

23 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. And then it was proptly deleted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The site broke through the 3 million barrier, with the honors taken by a short article about Norwegian actor Beate Eriksen

    And then the Wiki editors quickly deleted this article for being not important enough.

    1. Re:And then it was proptly deleted by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fun from the talk page. A Wiki language geek "honored" the article by translating it into Anglo-Saxon for the Anglo-Saxon language version of Wikipedia. Because if there's one language that Wikipedia needs to be translated in, it's one that no one actually speaks anymore. http://ang.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beate_Eriksen

    2. Re:And then it was proptly deleted by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's even funnier is comparing the relative lengths of related articles:

      For instance:

      Pokemon compared to Animal
      Wizard compared to Scientist
      Afghan Civil War compared to Marvel Civil War
      Emperor Palpatine compared to Emperor Charles IV
      Klingon Language compared to Mandarin Chinese

    3. Re:And then it was proptly deleted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, Francis Holburne just got slashdotted, so he's probably more noteworthy now.

    4. Re:And then it was proptly deleted by xaxa · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's the problem with the extra articles? They don't interfere with the "real" ones (whichever those are), and the category system serves to, well... categorise them. I've never come across an article on Pokemon, X-files or Star Trek, but if I needed some information on them I'd know where to look^W^W^W^Wkill myself.

  2. And that's... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    And for those of you keeping track, that's roughly 50,000 non-Manga/anime/Simpson's related articles.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:And that's... by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Funny
  3. 3 million eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Pity that two million of them are hopelessly biased toward whatever agenda has the most dweebs willing to re-write the articles 40 times a day.

  4. Crazy but true. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Beate Eriksen (who?) will be more famous for being the 3,000,000th wiki article than for his acting skills.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Crazy but true. by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Funny

      Especially when you can't even get her gender right.

  5. Re:The "3 million barrier" by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

    You could count them, but that would be original research.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  6. Re:The "3 million barrier" by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 4, Funny

    And no, you can't go to Wikipedia and count, because that would be "original research." Wait for someone to tweet about it - THERE's your proof.
    ;)

    --
    Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
  7. Beate Ericksen! by GPLDAN · · Score: 2, Funny

    Poor Beate. He now knows he's only the 3 millionth thing people got around to caring about.


    Beate baby - gotta work on your rep! Get a new agent. Have a scandal with an underage girl. No wait, this is Norway, make it a boy. You'll never make it into the post-apocalyptic ark that Norway is building in the Fjords at this rate!

    1. Re:Beate Ericksen! by LandDolphin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not according to Wikipedia!

      /Hold on, I have to make a quick edit

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
  8. What's special about three million? by line-bundle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am personally waiting for it to reach 3294199.

    (For those of you mathematically illiterate that number is pi*(2^20).)

    Wake me up when we get there.

    1. Re:What's special about three million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      For sufficiently large values of 3.

    2. Re:What's special about three million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well I'm waiting for article 3811170.

      (For those of you mathematically illiterate that number is tan(sqrt(2.4555))^e.)

  9. on friday by Tom · · Score: 3, Funny

    in other news, the english Wikipedia is expected to reach 2.5 million articles by friday, when all the deletionists are back from their holidays and are back on track again.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  10. Holding out for the 30 millionth article... by Lev13than · · Score: 4, Funny

    Congratulations to Wikipedia for celebrating this historic ***ERIC IS A FAG*** milestone, only 750 years in the making!

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
  11. Re:It's come a long way by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have you gone through his posting history? Seriously, read my entire post instead of just one sentence. I tell you, this man is brilliant.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  12. Re:Ebonics, etc by davidphogan74 · · Score: 2, Funny

    the same way you know (if you're a native English speaker) that "the big red ball" is correct and "the red big ball" is incorrect. Nobody taught you that.

    Me and my friends can disagree that language is best recieved by example instead of from the the educations.

  13. Re:Ebonics, etc by SilverEyes · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ah... associativity. Luckily, lojban will help solve this ambiguity. People just need to learn it. Quick, everyone get out of the universe!

    How many lojban speakers does it take to fix a broken light bulb?

    Three. One to fix the bulb, and two to argue about what kind of bulb emits broken light.

    --
    Interesting.
  14. Re:Ebonics, etc by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 4, Funny

    True, but I would argue that Ebonics is a more valid and complete language/dialect, being that it arose naturally.

    For those who haven't studied linguistics, yes, every dialect has its own grammatical rules. Those who speak a dialect learn the rules by example rather than from books - the same way you know (if you're a native English speaker) that "the big red ball" is correct and "the red big ball" is incorrect. Nobody taught you that. Most of the rules of language, in fact, are embedded in your brain before you ever go to school - how else could you talk?

    I suggest you go to Columbus, Ga and try to order something more complicated than "number 7 with Coke" from the drive-through.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.