Slashdot Mirror


The Mindset of the Incoming College Freshmen

Beloit College has come out with its annual Mindset List of what the incoming class (of 2013) has always known and has never known. "For these students, ... the Green Giant has always been Shrek, not the big guy picking vegetables. They have never used a card catalog to find a book. ... Tattoos have always been very chic and highly visible. ... Rap music has always been mainstream. ... Except for the present incumbent, the President has never inhaled. ... Amateur radio operators have never needed to know Morse code."

62 of 383 comments (clear)

  1. Sorry by dakohli · · Score: 5, Informative

    In my world, Britney Spears has never been featured on a Classic Rock Radio Station.
    Dave

    1. Re:Sorry by SgtKeeling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While most of the items on the list are true, some are off the mark as far as I'm concerned. "#64. CDs have never been sold in cardboard packaging" Personally, I see more and more CDs sold in cardboard rather than plastic these days. "#51. Britney Spears has always been heard on classic rock stations" Classic Rock Stations? I usually listen to the CBC (Talk Radio) or classic rock, and I've never heard Britney Spears on a rock station.

    2. Re:Sorry by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just always assumed every other boy had my mindset when I hit that age.

      Girls! GIRLS! GIRLS!!!

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    3. Re:Sorry by SpecBear · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I heard it, the old CD long boxes were designed so that music stores wouldn't have to replace their racks. Two CD cases side by side were the same size as a single vinyl record case.

    4. Re:Sorry by jo42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What is a "Britney Spears"?

    5. Re:Sorry by Angstroem · · Score: 3, Funny

      Britney spears are devices to spear Britneys, duh!

    6. Re:Sorry by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Must be an Americanization of Brittany spears, which, of course, are French polearms.

      -Peter

    7. Re:Sorry by scubamage · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a weapon, +4 to music slaying, +2 to virgin slaying, +10 to eardrum slaying. Successful attack requires target to roll saving throw for will.

    8. Re:Sorry by default+luser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And that's why a lot of new albums are sold in printed cardboard cases. The cardboard provides a skeleton that is more durable than a jewel case, and I think theyn add a little plastic to the mix to make it impressively flexible. The industry is starting to like these for other reasons too: for one, printed cardboard is less expensive than clear (i.e. "virgin") plastic.

      There are lots of variations on the design too - you can have pure reinforced cardboard sleeves, or you can combine a cardboard shell glued to a plastic disc holder. These cardboard shells also make it much easier to fit multiple discs in the standard jewel case footprint, which makes the logistics of shipping a double-album (or a bonus DVD) much simpler.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  2. 1984 much? by nadando · · Score: 5, Interesting

    'The European Union has always existed'.

    1. Re:1984 much? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The KGB has never officially existed.

      Sounds like something that might have been true all along...

    2. Re:1984 much? by gbarules2999 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know I'm not quite indicative of my fellow class of 2013 (I'm on Slashdot, dear lord), but this is nonsense. I know exactly who the Green Giant is and have eaten several of its products. I have indeed used a card catalog to find books, back in elementary and early middle school. Tattoos being chic is an opinion that is not shared by an entire generation.

      The actual link has truth in the list occasionally, but I'm annoyed at the assumptions made.

    3. Re:1984 much? by JimXugle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. The only things I could really relate to were the bits about chocolate chip cookie dough ice cream, GDP, and Blue Jello.

      Honestly, this is basically a list of things to assume about the class of 2013 that you can bring out in conversation to insult their knowledge of history.

      --
      -jX

      Don't you just love politics? It's like a comedy of errors.
    4. Re:1984 much? by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now now, lets not get rid of stereotypes: they make it easier it unnecessary to talk to the person to find out how they think. People of the previous generation actually listened to Rick Astley because they liked the music, they aren't sure if they should be using OS/2 or Win 3.0 for there application, they can't program their VCR, they didn't save for retirement because they were promised a pension and are now biter and broke. Does that about cover it?

    5. Re:1984 much? by bfrpsw · · Score: 2, Funny

      'The European Union has always existed'.

      My wife was teaching a first-year economics course last year, and in one lecture she displayed some OECD data from the last 40 years or so. A student put up his hand and asked "Why does it say *WEST* Germany?" :-)

    6. Re:1984 much? by silent_artichoke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well son, when a mommy and a USB WiFi stick love each other very much....

  3. Re:!news by PBoyUK · · Score: 3, Funny

    You must be new here...or wait, they must be new here. They're not new here yet, but will be new here soon, hence, news about being new here not yet but soon.

    Not news new here? Not new.

  4. Funny this should come out today... by Deadstick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...I just told my Electronics 1001 students about the tube testers they used to have at Seven-Eleven. I'll have a 12AU6 and a Slurpee, please. rj

  5. Seinfeld is "classic TV"... by cfa22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... and U2 sucks.

  6. No, please, stay on my lawn... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...with my eyesight failing from old age like this, it's too hard to aim if you're across the street.

    Somewhere between reactionary neophilia and reactionary neophobia, there is a sparsely populated middle ground where things are evaluated on their own merits, and new things are not automatically good nor old things automatically bad, or vice versa. The modern predilection for the new is just as robotic and mindless as the pre-modern predilection for tradition, the only difference being that we're now indoctrinated into neophilia by advertising instead of being indoctrinated into neophobia by religion.

    Maybe, if we learned from the past instead of ignoring it, we wouldn't feel compelled to reinvent COBOL every thirty years. Then we would have been spared the horror of Visual Basic, and then later, Python. Can't wait to see what the next lumbering reanimated monster from the forgotten past will be.

    Oh wait, I can already guess: another implementation of Scheme.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by PBoyUK · · Score: 3, Funny

      I find the concept of the reinvention of COBOL to be severely troubling. On the one hand, although Zombies are cool, they're still sufficiently dragged down by COBOL that the result would be terrible. On the other, a reinvention of COBOL could lead to the eventual development of time travel, fueled by the desire to go back and kill the nefarious project and/or creator in its infancy.

    2. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by zztzed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed it is.

    3. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by nidarus · · Score: 3, Informative

      The ++ operator doesn't exist because it's so convenient - it exists because ++ would translate to a faster opcode than regular addition. Python isn't compiled to machine code, so it's pointless to have it. It also occurs much less often in Python, because it doesn't use C's stupid "for" loop. The main (only?) argument for having it is because C has it.

      P.S.

      (result1, result2)[condition] or, if you prefer a special syntax, result1 if condition else result2.

    4. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was under the impression that pretty much any compiler on earth would end up reducing x = x + 1 or x += 1 back down the same opcodes as x++. They do a decent amount of optimizations on the code before compiling.

      Not that I CAN'T use the old x = x + 1 method (my first language was BASIC on a Commodore 64, so I used that a lot), nor do I even know Python, but IMHO just using ++ is much faster when coding. I'm a bit of a curmudgeon though. In general anything that strays from C-link syntax I just don't like too much. Like I said I learned on BASIC, and have also dabbled with Fortran quite a bit, but after I learned C and C++ in college it just seemed the "right" way to do things. These days I'm doing more in C# and PHP, but their syntax is still very C-ish.

      Still, sometime in the next year or two I do want to TRY to learn Ruby.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by spitzak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Although certainly the original reason for ++ was so that a very stupid compiler could still produce the optimal code, it also serves some purposes that are important:

      (complicated_expression)++ is much easier to read than complicate_expression = complicated_expression+1. In the second case it is often difficult to tell that it is the same variable. The only "modern" way to express this is with references, such as reference a = reference(complicated_expression); a = a+1.

      Also postfix ++ returns the previous value, this is often very useful, though confusing. It can be worked around again with a temporary variable.

  7. Re: by PBoyUK · · Score: 4, Funny

    Paper bricks the RIAA will throw at you when they catch you downloading music.

  8. I must be young at heart by chebucto · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I was born in the early 80s, and some of these things hold true for me, which is somehow reassuring
    • They have never used a card catalog to find a book.

    I find it hard to believe that there aren't still a lot of school libraries out there that still use card catalogues. But what do I know.

    • Margaret Thatcher has always been a former prime minister.

    I think there's at least a 10-year delay between birth and awareness of international politics; the first UK PM I remember John Major

    • Salsa has always outsold ketchup.

    I do remember the excitement we all felt when Salsa was officially the fastest-growing condiment in North America. Heady days, those.

    • Text has always been hyper.

    This is interesting. Wiki tells me the first web pages went up in December 1990. Those early days of the web have really moved into the realm of history, albeit recent history.

    • Bungee jumping has always been socially acceptable.

    I don't recall it ever being socially unaccebtable, though I do know it was considered - and is, if you ask me - a stupid thing to do, up there with jumping out of perfectly good airplanes.

    • They have never understood the meaning of R.S.V.P.

    Since when is RSVP out of our lexicon? I never got that memo.

    • The European Union has always existed.

    Well, the European Community has existed since the 50s; this one's more of a technicality.

    • McDonald's has always been serving Happy Meals in China.

    And Tianammen Square happened before they were born! Yikes.

    • Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap.

    I imagine this has been true since the 60s, at least.

    • The nation's key economic indicator has always been the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

    As opposed to what? The GNP?

    • Amateur radio operators have never needed to know Morse code.

    And I bet there's someone on Slashdot who cares! :)

    • There have always been flat screen televisions.

    I don't think there were any flat-screen TVs in 1991 - unless you count those flat-glass CRTs, which don't really count.

    • Britney Spears has always been heard on classic rock stations.

    Hah! I doubt that happens very often.

    • Vice presidents of the United States have always had real power.

    Quayle had power? Biden has power?

    • Migration of once independent media like radio, TV, videos and compact discs to the computer has never amazed them.

    That only became blase in the late 90s, as far as I'm concerned

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    1. Re:I must be young at heart by wangahrah · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not that RSVP is out of the lexicon, it's that its out of the mindset. As one entering freshman year of college a mere 7 years ago...kids THESE days almost never respond to invitations to social events, and on the rare occasions they solidify their plans by texting back "lulz i will c u thar", they skip out anyway when a perceived "better" opportunity with a hotter guy comes along. I'm not bitter.

    2. Re:I must be young at heart by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Born in the 80s?

      No, you are still young in body. But that's OK.

      As we get older, we're supposed to get wiser, but in fact as I get older I don't see most of my peers changing much at all. They were closed minded, ignorant,and obstreperously intolerant youths, and they're aging into closed minded, ignorant and obstreperously intolerant elders. The world moves past them; it changes and they don't change with it. They're too picky about who they learn from to learn much at all. As youths, they see the experiences of their elders as belonging to an irrelevant, bygone age. As elders, they've become certain that every thought worth having must have already passed through their heads.

      Here's a test: if as a young person you can and do have friends older than yourself, chances are you'll have young friends when you are older. That's a nice thing when your old friends start to die, but just as importantly it means you'll probably keep learning things as you get older. Young people who think they can't learn anything from their elders are right, but they don't realize that's because they're already rotting from the head down. Sooner or later they'll become exactly the kind of old fogey they despise, because they've already got the attitude. All they need is a few decades.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  9. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's something to that. This is a generation that grew up thinking Jerry Springer was normal and acceptable behavior.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  10. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by samexner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What gives you the right to say that? You're generalising my generation. You are implying that we all listen to rap, and we all conform. You are implying that we are all stupid, and we all are materialistic. I do not listen to rap. I listen to Slayer. I am not stupid. I kick my whole classes ass at the academic bowl every year. I know about these things. I know who the green giant is. We are not all ignorant. It's like me saying your generation is the pot smoking generation. Or maybe you're older. Maybe you're the racist generation. You can't generalise a whole generation of people. You're saying that all the people who will spend the vast majority of their life in the 21st century are ignorant conformists who listen to rap. That's not very fair of you.

  11. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I do not listen to rap. I listen to Slayer.

    Lol at this retort to a "white trash generation" claim.

  12. Re:My conclusion.. by tonycheese · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would that put us in any kind of trouble? Is it particularly important to know that some countries on the equator are cold? How is that relevant to anything? This list looks to me like an entertainment piece, reminding people of rapid culture changes in the US or the world. It doesn't exist to show us that we have a failing education system.

  13. Fucked? Hell no! Not yet at least... by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We're fucked and we've fucked their future. I don't think that one's on the list, but, I'm guessing, it's something any bright grad will know.

    Are you fucking kidding me? They've got another 4 years and $95,000 worth of debt to rack up before they sue the college for not being handed a six-figure salary WITH their diploma. Yeah, talk about a fucked system.

    IMHO, we haven't begun to see fucked yet, with the ignorance that MTV likes to portray as the Real World. Let's hope there are still some out there who still see the morality of the world today AND are bright enough to see that we have more than ONE political party out there.

  14. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by samexner · · Score: 2, Informative

    But my point is we do not all listen to rap. Some of us might. And some of us might listen to Led Zeppelin and Rush.

  15. Re:Fucked? Hell no! Not yet at least... by Anoraknid+the+Sartor · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... still - on the the bright side - at least we got fucked....

    --
    Find Japanese addresses in English on Google Maps Japan: http://diddlefinger.com/
  16. And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by JoshuaZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Soon they will also be people who only remember when Fermat's Last Theorem was a solved problem, not one of the great mysteries told to young kids interested in mathematics. I've worked for a few years teaching number theory to highschool students and it came as a shock when I realized that I was teaching some students who had actually been born after Andrew Wiles had proved Fermat's Last Theorem. The proof of FLT was one of the defining moments in my mathematical childhold. And in a year or two, those kids will in college. There really isn't any simple problem that has the same wonderful history to rope kids into doing math by looking really easy and yet having such a convoluted and romantic history. Even the oldest two unsolved problems in mathematics (whether there are any odd perfect numbers and whether there are infinitely many even perfect numbers) don't have the same sort of romance to them: No one ever claimed they had a beautiful proof of these. Ok, someone now go ahead and mark this an off-topic ramble by an old-codger...

    1. Re:And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by biobogonics · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Soon they will also be people who only remember when Fermat's Last Theorem was a solved problem, not one of the great mysteries told to young kids interested in mathematics.

      The problem might be solved, but there still is a lingering mystery. Did Fermat have a proof by elementary methods? Does such a proof exist? But I suppose that since there is A proof, the impetus to find another one is mostly gone.

    2. Re:And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by dasunt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem might be solved, but there still is a lingering mystery. Did Fermat have a proof by elementary methods? Does such a proof exist? But I suppose that since there is A proof, the impetus to find another one is mostly gone.

      There's a great passing mention of Fermat's last theorem in the book "The Light of other Days".

      In the book, a device allows one to see the past. Someone looks at old Fermat, and discovers he did possess a simple and elegant proof.

      That proof ends up spawning an entire new field of mathmatics. ;)

  17. Re:We're Fucked by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 5, Insightful
    As an academic, part of what I do is try and get them to think. It's never been easy, but after 30 years of postmodernist bullshit, the layer of cynicism, empty irony, and clueless is so thick and self-reinforcing, it's much more difficult than it used to be to get through to these people. Last year was the hardest.

    I quote, "What's wrong withe status quo? It works for me!"

    Argh.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  18. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by PBoyUK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At what I feel may be a very real risk of WHOOSH, I'll respond. This hate on "generalising" is totally irrational. Humans are habit forming, pattern matching biological machines who owe a large part of our success as a species to the ability to generalise. Forming connections based on observed behaviours between multiple sources and using those connections to draw conclusions. Sometimes right, sometimes wrong, but largely useful. Surely you recognise that in even attempting to speak on the character on something as widely varied as the culture of a generation of people, you're dealing with such huge numbers of people that in order to say anything of non-obvious value means identifying the largest occupied unions of the set. What's crazy here is your apparent level of butthurt over someone putting a label on something which by your tone you already knew to be true.

    Or maybe you're hating on generalisations for the sake of them being generalisations. Which is twisted in its own ironic way because it's not based on any proof that abstraction is a bad thing, but rather on the feared result of being subject to some inappropriate application of generalisation to an individual. So really you're damning generalisation as a whole because some idiots misuse it. Generalising generalising not out of its most frequent use, but most feared misuse, a highly faulty premise.

  19. WHAT THE FUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the fuck? What is this bullshit? This is not "news". Put this shit back in Idle, or better yet, give it back to Oprah where it belongs.

    1. Re:WHAT THE FUCK by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, its vaguely-but-not-really interesting stuff like this that belongs in Idle.

  20. Few things. by Omniscient+Lurker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a upcoming freshmen let me make a few points. 3. The Green Giant has always been Shrek, not the big guy picking vegetables. Shrek came out in 2001. I remember part of the first 11 years of my life. Including the Jolly Green Giant (not much but enough to never call Shrek the green giant). 4. They have never used a card catalog to find a book. My first Elementary School had one, so did the public library back then. 8. Tattoos have always been very chic and highly visible. That's pretty regional, it is only in the last few years they have caught on where I live 19. They have never understood the meaning of R.S.V.P. Send a Reply/Confirmation? 21. Except for the present incumbent, the President has never inhaled. ??? 27. Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap. Not in my school(s). 44. There have always been flat screen televisions. Maybe, but how many people had them earlier in the 90's (my childhood). 51. Britney Spears has always been heard on classic rock stations. She didn't really become popular till the late 90s. How'd she get on classics for my entire life when she didn't start until halfway through it? 53. Someone has always been asking: "Was Iraq worth a war?" They're gonna be asking that a long time. 54. Most communities have always had a mega-church. I let this slide because they used "most".

  21. Re: by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Funny

    A PDF reader than can only display a single PDF file. It is immune to rm but is difficult to back up and doesn't have a search feature.

  22. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Nutria · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a generation that grew up thinking Jerry Springer was normal and acceptable behavior.

    Because their parents suck, politically-correct panty-waisted fools who "feel" their children won't love them if a parent say, means, and enforces:

    No, you can not watch South Park! It's rated MA for a reason! Now go outside and practice with that Savage Model 40 we bought you last year, and don't be greedy when it's your sister's turn...

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  23. Completely lost on them...... by idiotnot · · Score: 3, Funny

    "you have died of dysentery"

    As well as MS-DOS and the Apple II.

  24. The President Has Never Inhaled by Myopic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They say that "Except for the present incumbent, the President has never inhaled", but that confuses me. Obviously this is a reference to Clinton, but Bush was a well-known druggie and drunk. Am I to believe that he commonly snorted coke off of coeds' naked bodies and drove drunk, but never puffed a joint? I suppose that is possible, but I find it hard to believe.

  25. Re: by Miamicanes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > "They have never used a card catalog to find a book"

    Yawn. I was a UM Freshman in 1992. At that point, I think the card catalog was still there, but there were OLD, tattered signs perched on top warning that it was no longer maintained (and apparently hadn't been maintained in years). My high school library had a card catalog, but that was because it sucked. The public library downtown had greenscreen terminals since middle school.

    What does having been born in 1973 imply?

    * We never understood why our parents got so excited by seeing moonwalkers on TV. Men had *always* been walking on the moon.

    * We didn't notice the videogame crash of 1983, because we'd all moved on and gotten Commodore 64s for Christmas anyway. Six years later, shopping for Amiga toyz, it blew our minds that there were STILL stores selling stuff for the Atari 2600, even though we still thought the Colecovision and Vectrex were kind of cool in their own way.

    * NES? Yawn. Amiga rulez. Well, ok... Sonic on the Genesis is kind of cool...

    * A *Gameboy*?!? (Retch. Retch. Vomit.) They're for teenyboppers and poor kids. (pulls out Lynx)

    * Sprites were invented for programming convenience.

    * You mean assemblers weren't *always* two-pass?

    * We learned binary by drawing 8x8 grids, writing "256 | 128 | 64 | 32 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1" over them, coloring in the squares where we wanted the pixel to be non-transparent, then added up the numbers above each row's darkened squares and added another DATA statement with 8 values separated by commas to define our custom characters.

    * Unix was lame. It was like PCs, but worse, because at least PCs had primitive color and shitty games. Linux didn't become interesting until the internet and web servers made it relevant.

    * When picking a foreign language to study in high school and/or college, German was the obvious choice. Spanish might have been practical, and French was the language of love, but German was the language of zer0daywar3z.

    * We pissed off our parents by running a fake BBS off the family phone line for a week so we could spend more on a US Robotics HST 9600 baud modem than some of our friends paid for their first *cars*... and smile, because we were getting them for less than half price with the sysop discount.

    * Every high school had at least one really, really insanely rich kid who put a car battery and rigged-up car phone in his locker his freshman year so he could act cool and call his answering machine at home between classes to check his messages. By 12th grade, it was officially forbidden by the school, and he got a detention the day his shiny new brick rang in history class.

    * People around campus pointed at you, and called you "the laptop guy" because you had a 12-pound luggable in your backpack that was *almost* powerful enough to run WordPerfect for DOS without too much lag... as long as there was a power outlet nearby.

  26. Cynical observations for the current generation by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful
    • There have always been homeless people in American cities.
    • About 10% of Americans will see their income drop by half in any given year. This is normal.
    • There have always been tent cities in the US.
    • The Government never paid welfare to people who couldn't get jobs.
    • Employers never offered retirement plans that took care of employees.
    • Employers never paid for medical care.
    • Most manufactured retail goods were always imported.
    • College educations at state schools were never free.
    1. Re:Cynical observations for the current generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      • There have always been homeless people in American cities.

      As a matter of fact, there have always been homeless people since there have been people. There are homeless people in French cities too. What's your point?

      • About 10% of Americans will see their income drop by half in any given year. This is normal.

      Source?

      • There have always been tent cities in the US.

      There was a time when all frontier towns were tent cities.

      • The Government never paid welfare to people who couldn't get jobs.

      The government paid welfare from 1929 until the present. Somehow, the nation and its people survived from inception to 1929. I wonder how?

      • Employers never offered retirement plans that took care of employees.

      Corporate annuities were seldom a good deal, and few people lived long enough to be retired. 20+ year retirements are now common.

      • Employers never paid for medical care.

      That's right! people just died.

      • Most manufactured retail goods were always imported.

      Source? The United States is still the world's largest manufacturer.

      • College educations at state schools were never free.

      College education at elite private schools is free when there is need. Families that earn $120,000 to $180,000 are only asked to pay 10% of their income for tuition, room, board, and fees.

  27. When I was a freshman in the early 1970s by Rick17JJ · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I was a college freshman in the early 1970s, this was our world:

    Cell phones did not exist, although most doctors had some type of telephone in their cars.

    Home computers and on-line banking and on-line shopping did not exist. Text messaging did not exist. Facebook, MySpace and Twitter did not exist (I still don't know what they are).

    Some of the older telephones still were the rotary phones, where we had to dial the number. We could hear the pulse type dialing being used. The newer phones probably had the buttons and tones, by then. If we dialed 0, by itself, we could talk to the operator. If I am not mistaken, we still had to pay extra, on our monthly bill, for each extra telephone in the house.

    Typewriters were used to type letters. Some were electric and some were purely mechanical.

    Many secretaries knew how to take dictation by shorthand.

    Slide rules were frequently used by engineers and scientists to perform addition, subtraction, roots, logarithms and trigonometry. Pocket calculators did not exist. However, adding machines did exist.

    Nearly all of the appliances that we owned were controlled by mechanical knobs and levers. It was more of an analog world, although large businesses did have computers.

    Many businesses still used punched cards to store data for computer databases.

    We were being encouraged to used trans fats instead of saturated fats because they were supposedly less dangerous than saturated fats. Now we are being told that trans fats are even worse.

    Cars needed a minor tune up every 6,000 miles and a major tuneup every 12,000 miles. Engines usually needed to be overhauled at about 100,000 miles. Most of our gasoline powered cars had carburetors. To start a car when it was cold, we had to pump the gas peddle several times first. On some older cars, we also still had to use a mechanical choke.

    Police cars could do about 140 MPH and policemen carried revolvers instead of pistols.

    I hoped I would not be drafted and sent to Vietnam. Fortunately, the war was winding down by then, an few people were drafted that year.

    AIDs did not exist and I had never even heard of herpes, until several years later.

    If a young person asked the barber to not cut his hair too short, the barber frequently cut it somewhat shorter than he wanted anyway (for some reason). Eventually barbers stopped doing that.

    In many states our social security number was used as our drivers license number. Grocery stores would not accept credit cards, so we usually paid by check. When writing a check at the grocery store or elsewhere, the cashier or clerk usually wrote our driver's license number on the back of our check. Over the decades, many thousands of people have seen my driver's license number and written it on the back of my thousands of checks.

    1. Re:When I was a freshman in the early 1970s by soundguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Additionally, in most places there were only 3 broadcast TV stations, 4 if you were lucky enough to have a PBS affiliate in town. Cable was just getting started. If your TV had a remote, it was probably a "clicker" that struck a steel bar creating a harmonic tone that triggered an audio receiver in the TV. A lot of people you knew still had a black & white set.

      Rock music on FM radio was pretty new. Not many years earlier, FM was all classical and "old people" music.

      There was only one telephone company and one phone book. It was illegal to plug anything into the phone system that they didn't build and provide to you. There were no answering machines or fax machines.

      Only the wealthy "jet set" rode on airplanes.

      Gas was 33 cents a gallon. Your family car weighed at least 2 tons and had a V-8 engine with 300 horsepower or more. Premium gasoline was 102-104 octane as measured by the old method.

      Comic books were 15 cents, having jumped up from the 12 cents of the Silver Age at the end of the 60's. Pretty much everyone read LIFE Magazine, which was mostly pictures and articles about the Viet Nam war

      Solder was 60% lead, and you could roll your own electronics with parts from Radio Shack or a half dozen electronics mail-order catalogs.

      Most of the pennies in circulation were solid copper and you could still occasionally find a quarter, 50 cent piece, or dollar coin in your pocket change that was solid silver. Old Canadian nickels had something like 8 flat sides and didn't work in US vending machines. They were being phased out but you still saw them now and then.

      It cost 8 cents to mail a 1st-class letter.

      Coke and Pepsi were made with cane sugar.

      Young whippersnappers were ALWAYS on your lawn because there were no personal computers, cell phones, video games, MTV, or microwaveable hot pockets to keep them indoors and out of sight.

      --
      Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
  28. Re: by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some do indeed have a search feature. It's typically at the end of the file.

            -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  29. Re:We're Fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a student, I say, fuck that, my dear academic, and fuck your easy willingness to give up on us. We clueless, cynical, little automatons have been tasked with developing our own frameworks for filtering and handling information blasted at us from society's great unmetered firehose even as you sit there whining on Slashdot about your abject failure to connect with us. We, the post-post-modern twerps that you are griping about, have grown up DRENCHED in information, to the point that we're numbed to it. We have not experienced the type of developmental cocoons that previous generations wore into adulthood; we didn't grow up in a crappy town where our best sources of information were an out-of-date encyclopedia, Time magazine, and the evening news. We grew up with Internet access and a TV in our bedroom, and we realized at quite a young age that most of the ideas we thought we were alone in having were actually shared by countless thousands or millions. It's discouraging to the thinker, really; quite often, the instant we have a thought, we type it into Google and realize that the discussion is not merely mature, but closed. We realized early on that we were not alone, yet nobody cared what we had to say.

    I can say, without specific knowledge of your field, that your job is fundamentally two pronged: it is the promotion of the best approximation of reality available, and it is also the displacement of the less accurate models which came before. Modernism/postmodernism had an important job to do, and retains some importance as a perspective, a naggling doubt at the back of every good student's mind, but it's beginning to reach saturation in my own, younger generation. The holdouts who haven't either digested the pill to the best of their abilities or passed it through their system are getting rare outside of some fairly recognizable enclaves. It's time to react to that fact. We young people have been told to ask "why?" as a reflex, true, but many of us have unfortunately developed the habit of making snap judgments in the face of informational overload. We have no authorities; we have no role models. The politicians are liars; the businessmen are crooks; the priests are pedophiles. We never learned about righteousness and values; we were taught consumerism and encouraged to swim in knowledge as if we would learn by mere proximity. We are three generations removed from the cultural revolutions of the sixties and seventies. Our grandparents were at Woodstock enjoying sex, drugs, and rock and roll; our parents grew up shaking their heads at the hypocrisy of their suddenly-reactionary baby boomer parents, and now we, their kids, don't know what the hell to think. They say that it takes three generations to breed accent out of spoken language; we've left respect for authority so far behind us that we can't even conceive what the fuss was about.

    Our childhood is getting longer, as is our adolescence, although we were exposed to the facts of life as soon as we could reach a keyboard. It seems that college is no longer a privilege, but a right awarded for simply not screwing up massively in life. Many of us arrive with no specific goal in mind, expecting to have our hands held as they were in high school, and we often wind up with a degree in hand and no plans for its use. Alternately, many of us believe (often correctly) that our future employers care little about what is taught in college and that simply completing the routine is what matters. The reasoners, the deep thinkers, and those interested in pursuing science for its own sake are in there too, but we've always been there, Mr. Academic. Our deep-thinking minds have always been attracted to the college atmosphere, but those of us with that mindset make up a proportionally smaller fragment of the new student body. You, sir, are in a situation where you need to search diligently for the part of that scholastically-minded fragment that's interested in learning, but afraid to step forth; the ones that have been repeatedly abused or isolated

  30. Re:What exactly is the author trying to convey? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then at the top are lines like "Members of the class of 2013 won't be surprised when they can charge a latte on their cell phone and curl up in the corner to read a textbook on an electronic screen.".... nor should anyone who has recently left the cave. Hell, the first guy I knew that got an eReader was in his 60s. You're not excused from observing your surroundings just because you've made it to (or past) middle-aged.

    I think it emphasizes the speed of societal and technological change which has been going on of late (say, the last two decades). I recall hearing in the early '00s how we are now undergoing a greater increase in knowledge as a society in a single day than occurred during the whole of WW2 - or something to that effect. That much change, that quickly, can have a drastic impact on a society, whether intentional or not.

    Consider: kids today have, in all likelihood, always had cell phones and SMS. I'm 28 and I remember having friends whos' parents did not yet have a house phone. I do not SMS regularly; yet kids today are glued to it. My wife is a handful of years younger than I, and she is more inclined to text than I am. But it goes beyond that.

    Is a person more inclined to pick up a book and read it, or search it out, if all they're familiar with (or primarily familiar with) are computers and web pages? There are kids out there who were born after Internet Explorer 3 came out who are fully 'plugged in' and have little to no interaction with 'dead media'.

    Ignoring the possibility that they will potentially remain mostly illiterate throughout their lives, this is a huge, HUGE jump in world perception from what even my generation experienced: I'm 28, for crying out loud! I am NOT old, yet I see what the "youth" are doing and have access to, and what they haven't experienced, and I'm blown away by the changes.

    Case in point: computers in schools. They were just starting to be a big thing when I was a kid, with the Apple IIe, III and similar monochrome display, 5.25" floppy, CLI driven machines. When computerized card catalogs came along, they were CLI based up through college. Most of the current generation equates 'typing commands' with something vaguely "programming" or "hacking" and use (in terms of functionality, from what I've seen) horrible web based catalogs. They interface through a GUI, with their mouse, and mostly don't have a comprehension of "data" (or data/file types) so much as "files" and "folders".

    Anyway, I'm getting way off here. The point I'm trying to make is: things are changing a lot, and whereas it used to be that Grandma couldn't relate to Johny and his evil music with a beat that wasn't about baby Jesus in the 1920s, we're now seeing a "cultural gap" occur every 5 or so years - often with clear punctuation points as new fads come into the forefront (emo, rap, Xbox, etc.). Those things all shape and form culture pretty quickly to be something completely alien to those who were in the same "spot" not long ago.

    Did you know that tight polyester dickies (slacks, whatever you want to call them) in horrible colors have come and gone twice again since the 1970s, both in the last several years? THAT is what I'm talking about.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  31. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's just a different genre of mindless grunting.

    Thank you for showing your ignorance. Death and thrash metal (including Slayer) are both incredibly intricate and demanding styles of music. I am not sure what kind of music you listen to, but Slayer's compositions and playing ability are light years ahead of ANY popular music these days. You might not like it, this form of music may not be your cup of tea, but calling it mindless is just plain ignorant. Each member of that band (Araya excepted) has more musical ability than pretty much everything you hear on the radio. I would be very interested to hear... what do you listen to that you base your comparison off of? I listen to literally everything, and I put death metal in the same vaunted category as jazz and classical in terms of musicianship.

    --
    To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  32. Re: by ricegf · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was a UM Freshman in 1992... We learned binary by drawing 8x8 grids, writing "256 | 128 | 64 | 32 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1" over them

    I was a Mississippi State freshman in 1979, and we still could only fit "128 | 64 | 32 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1" above an 8x8 grid. I hope to God that your UM was Ole Miss!

  33. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by GaryOlson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For the first time reading Slashdot, a comment has made we want to take a radioactive shower and wash that concept out of my mind.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  34. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because their parents suck, politically-correct panty-waisted fools....

    Wait wait wait. "Politically-correct" parents are responsible for kids growing up thinking that the sort of behavior seen on Jerry Springer was normal? "Politically-correct" parents would let their kids watch South Park?

    Eh, no. Political correctness can be stupid, but it's not the sort of stupidity that neglects filtering what children see and hear -- if anything, it's the opposite sort of stupidity, that thies to make sure that children don't see and hear anything "offensive".

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  35. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Tarsir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course you kick your whole class' ass at the academic bowl - you're in a generation of ignorant conformists! :P

  36. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by rotor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't get me wrong - I've been a Slayer fan since the 80's, but to say that they have more musical ability than pretty much everything on the radio is just plain wrong. They have written some fantastic stuff and have the ability to play fast, but both Kerry and Jeff get sloppy when they play fast. Tom plays simple bass lines and doesn't get too complicated with the vocals. Dave is a fantastic drummer though.

    If you want to compare musical ability of metal players with what you hear on the radio, there are thousands of better choices.

    Oh - and to get back to the great grandparent, I don't think the article said that all of this generation listen to rap. Even the quote in the summary says, "Rap music has always been mainstream." You can't deny that for kids going into college this year.

    --
    Addlepated - punk & metal