Slashdot Mirror


BrainPort Lets the Blind "See" With Their Tongues

Hugh Pickens writes "Scientific American reports that a new device called 'BrainPort' aims to restore the experience of vision for the blind and visually impaired by relying on the nerves on the tongue's surface to send light signals to the brain. BrainPort collects visual data through a small digital video camera and converts the signal into electrical pulses sent to the tongue via a 'lollipop' that sits directly on the tongue, where densely packed nerves receive the incoming electrical signals. White pixels yield a strong electrical pulse and the electrodes spatially correlate with the pixels, so that if the camera detects light fixtures in the middle of a dark hallway, electrical stimulations will occur along the center of the tongue. Within 15 minutes of using the device, blind people can begin interpreting spatial information. 'At first, I was amazed at what the device could do,' says research director William Seiple. 'One guy started to cry when he saw his first letter.'" There is some indication that the signals from the tongue are processed by the visual cortex. The company developing the BrainPort will submit it to the FDA for approval later this month, and it could be on sale (for around $10,000) by the end of the year.

28 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. Hey Sexy! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oooh hello pretty lady, come on over here and let me get a good lick at you.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Hey Sexy! by webdog314 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The device in on your tongue... hmmm...

      "Oooh heyo preyee ledy, coo on ower here an leh ey geh a goo lig ah yo."

  2. Skittles ad campaigns finally pay off by Scott64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Taste the rainbow" was the first thing that came to mind when I read this.

    1. Re:Skittles ad campaigns finally pay off by fragMasterFlash · · Score: 2, Funny

      Me too ;-)

    2. Re:Skittles ad campaigns finally pay off by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just remember that episode of the Tick, where Arthur was turned into a giant tongue. As they ran, he shouted in horror, "I can taste the floor!"

  3. tastes like... by thadmiller · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does that mean ugly girls "taste like shit"?

    1. Re:tastes like... by PachmanP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does that mean ugly girls "taste like shit"?

      Well that's going to depend entirely on where you look.

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
  4. Nothing new here... by imikedaman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm pretty sure I read about this exact thing years ago. Weren't there issues with the tongue being "low resolution" and interfering with eating and talking?

    1. Re:Nothing new here... by lessthan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I was thinking that too, then I read the rest of the summary. They are submitting the BrainPort to the FDA this month. That is why it is news.

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
  5. Pattern Stream Processing. by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The human brain is adept at processing pattern streams. These are two-dimensional datasets that change over regular intervals of time. In the specific case of this tongue-sight project, they are taking advantage of the ability of the tongue to transmit many "pixels" of sensory information in a square grid. Which pins poked into the tongue governed what the brain got that instant of time. So, by reading the changing pattern of the dots, the brain can learn to process that pattern stream in the same way it learns to process the pattern stream that is the million or so "pixels" of information each eye sends, each unit of time. The left brain hemisphere processes Linear-Sequential Information. The right brain hemisphere processes Visual-Simultaneous Information. We know that from the Nobel-prize-winning [1980] research of Dr. Roger Sperry. Current computers process information in a linear, sequential fashion--much like the left hemisphere works. The true breakthroughs in AI will come when we can process and interpret the pattern streams that reach the right hemisphere, the image-oriented streams. The complex interplay between the faster linear-sequential hemisphere and the holistic visual-simultaneous hemisphere is what creates consciousness. This tongue-stream is a great idea.

    1. Re:Pattern Stream Processing. by tolan-b · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You were doing so well for about half a post then it all went to shit :)

      The order in which data is input into a computer makes no difference, processing is typically done frame by frame for a visual dataset, so each cycle (not CPU..) of processing acts on the whole 2D structure in one go.

      Besides, hardware based artificial neural networks for processing images process 2D pixel arrays in parallel.

      Also I think you're miles off when it comes to consciousness. Despite many claims I don't think anyone's really anywhere near any real idea of what it is. I think it might be an emergent property of certain types of complex system, but that's as much of a guess as yours is and I'm not going to try to state it as fact.

    2. Re:Pattern Stream Processing. by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Jeff Hawkins (founder of Palm) wrote an excellent book "On Intelligence" that deals extensively with pattern stream processing. I think the human brain is so plastic that it can handle much, much more stimulation than we give it credit for. Consider the contrast in the sensory ambient environment of the modern man versus the same man 100 years prior. Quite different. I think the human brain can do anything--and we are not at 1% of its capacity. If you want to add more inputs through an ankle pattern, I think your brain could learn to regularly monitor those inputs. It would learn its own language that you could read.

  6. Colours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So what does blue taste like?

    1. Re:Colours by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

      It tastes like oranges.

  7. How about the back or chest? by davidwr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure, the resolution won't be as fine but it will be a lot less obtrusive to wear a sensor wrapped around your torso than to have something on your tongue with a wire sticking out of your mouth.

    A practical version of that sensor net the blind lady wore on Star Trek back in the '60s will likely be on the market before 2067, assuming technology doesn't leapfrog it entirely.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:How about the back or chest? by johncadengo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure, the resolution won't be as fine but it will be a lot less obtrusive to wear a sensor wrapped around your torso than to have something on your tongue with a wire sticking out of your mouth.

      A practical version of that sensor net the blind lady wore on Star Trek back in the '60s will likely be on the market before 2067, assuming technology doesn't leapfrog it entirely.

      From TFA:

      The key to the device may be its utilization of the tongue, which seems to be an ideal organ for sensing electrical current. Saliva there functions as a good conductor, Seiple said. Also it might help that the tongue's nerve fibers are densely packaged and that these fibers are closer to the tongue's surface relative to other touch organs. (The surfaces of fingers, for example, are covered with a layer of dead cells called stratum corneum.)

      --
      My page.
  8. Seeing Sound? by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    About 20 years ago I thought of a device for deaf people to "see sound" after reading that researchers have learned to read spoken words from from gray-scale sound spectrograms (frequency plots).

    Now an off-the-shelf PDA or iPhone could probably do the trick of showing a plot with the right software. Some slashdot readers claimed it's too hard to learn if you never heard sound before. But it may be worth a try. Besides, some deaf people used to hear before an injury or illness. It's basically pattern-recognition, something humans are pretty good at given sufficient feedback.

    Perhaps these devices can be combined and the frequency plots could flow through the tongue. However, I suspect there's insufficient resolution that way, and eyeballing it would be better. But, it's worth a try.

    1. Re:Seeing Sound? by ozydingo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      An iPhone or PDA easily has enough computing power to do a real-time spectrogram, but to be nitpicky, it's a time-frequency plot, not just a frequency plot. In my experience it's pretty hard to pick up the ability to read spectrograms of speech accurately and quickly, then again it's not my only access to speech. At the very least it would increase a deaf user's awareness of sound in his or her environment, and there would be at least a minimum level of discrimination between various types of sounds.

      As for alternate modes of sensation (assuming something like a cochlear implant is a no-go), look into some of the work being done in vibro-tactile devices - http://techtv.mit.edu/genres/18-education/videos/3557-speakers-and-signers-ted-moallem-sensible-technologies----sensory-communication-aids-for-the-developing-world

  9. Re:Nothing to see here by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The hardware seems like a fairly pedestrian evolution of cheap image sensors and high-density fabrication techniques.

    The fact that the brain will, fairly swiftly, being interpreting electrical pulses on the tongue as visual input blows my insufficiently capacious mind.

  10. First tongue death? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who'll be the first to choke to death on Goatse?

  11. Re:Nothing new here... (slashdot article links) by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative

    A whole load of links done with the Google site:slashdot.org search modifier

    Slashdot 2006

    PBS 2007

    Slashdot 2008

    Sensory substitution

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  12. Wonderful! by Zitchas · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't have the link ready to hand, but the technology behind this was posted to slashdot quiet a while ago. (At least many months, possibly over a year ago) Anyway, I was wondering when we would hear about this technology again, since it has tremendous potential both for sight-restoration applications, as well as furthur development towards the integration of machine and brains. If the resolution was high enough, for instance, a pilot could use this to see underneath the plane, or in other directions normally blocked. The potential application for guided search and rescue, and other remote controlled devices is also large. "being" there is better than simply seeing on a screen, after all, even if virtually. I hope that the various gov't and none-profit groups that support the visually impaired take note of this as a way to help people become active and contributing parts of society again. It's nice to take care of the impaired, but better to help them regain their independence.

    --
    Z
  13. The Brain That Changes Itself by smcdow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can read all about the work leading up to this device, why it works, amazing stories of recovery from brain injury, and other cool stuff in a book called The Brain That Changes Itself.

    This is one of the best books I've ever read.

    --
    In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
  14. Danger... Hot Food by fractalVisionz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What happens when you burn your tongue? Does your "sight" degrade or get blurry while your taste buds are being repaired?

  15. Memory wipe by tuxicle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fry: Did everything just taste purple for a second?

  16. Useful for sighted people? by Mprx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tactile reaction time is faster than visual reaction time. If the resolution is high enough and the switching time fast enough, could this system be advantageous where fast reactions are needed (eg. games, sport, driving, combat, etc.). Could it be combined with normal vision for a kind of minor precognition?

    How about using it for extended vision with more frequency channels, wider or narrower field of vision, faster automatic brightness control, etc? Touch has multiple channels but how many are high enough resolution to be useful?

    As anyone who's used psychedelic drugs will know, the human visual system is bottlenecked by the eyes. The brain can certainly handle more powerful sensors so we should be working on making them.

  17. The inverse by MathiasRav · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd love to be able to see tastes - that is, have my sense of taste piped to the brain as vision instead of taste. I wouldn't want my vision permanently replaced, but I'd love to experience the brain visualising what I taste. And hey, instead of the usual 3 dimensions (or more if you're lucky), you'd have 5 factors to go with.

  18. Re:Old News: Wired, 2007 by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 2, Informative

    Older than that. From September 1, 2001:

    http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+Seeing+Tongue-a078681631