Slashdot Mirror


"Gigantic Jets" Blast Electricity Into the Ionosphere

New Scientist has an update on the so-called "gigantic jets" first discovered in 2003 — these are lightning bolts that reach from cloud tops upward into the ionosphere, as high as 90 kilometers. (There's a video at the link.) What's new is that researchers from Duke University have managed to measure the electrical discharge from a gigantic jet and confirm that they carry as much energy skyward as ordinary lightning strikes carry to the ground. According to the article, "Gigantic jets are one of a host of new atmospheric phenomena discovered in recent years. Other examples are sprites and blue jets."

3 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. First post to claim this is God's work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    God dunnit!

  2. Re:Sprites by ahankinson · · Score: 0, Troll

    I think you more prove his point than refute it...

    If someone wants to investigate a phenomenon by putting it in a different light, what is it to you? Yet you spit vitriol at anyone who attempts to frame an argument that goes against the "general wisdom."

    The EU theory may very well be wrong. But it's an idea, and it's an idea that helps frame understanding the universe in a new light. That's the way of progress. If it's a bad idea, it will die on its own merits; but if it's a good idea, killing it prematurely by putting it down simply because it goes against conventional wisdom is doing nobody any good.

  3. Re:Sprites by causality · · Score: 1, Troll

    In many cases, getting the science right is less difficult than getting the science community and the general public to accept your discovery.

    And that's a serious problem. Those two should be one and the same. Anytime it is otherwise, what you have is not science but a religion that uses scientific language.

    I think the view of what "skepticism" means has a lot to do with this. At one point, skepticism meant something like "we really don't know either way, we should assume nothing, and we should ask questions and investigate before any conclusions are drawn." Now, it means something more like "we will deny this discovery no matter what, even if that means clutching at straws or using flimsy reasoning, until it becomes blatantly smack-you-in-the-face obvious and even then we will acknowledge it only reluctantly and preferably when a lot of other people do so first." This can only lead to stagnation.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein