Slashdot Mirror


Swedish Authorities Attempt Pirate Bay Shutdown

Several sources are discussing the recent attempted shutdown of The Pirate Bay by Swedish authorities. It seems that following the recent court defeats and the pending civil actions, Swedish authorities threatened TPB's main bandwidth supplier with a hefty fine in order to get them shut down. Not surprisingly TPB has relocated and is back online although the tracker still seems to be down. As a gesture of their "appreciation" TPB plans on sending a mocking t-shirt to the people believed responsible for the takedown attempt.

20 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. How long can they fight it by sopssa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is really just the last attemps to remain online. How long will it take until they're closed at another ISP again? (TPB is down again btw). And how long will it take until their domain is pulled down?

    This time they're not just arguing against media companies/RIAA/MPAA in USA, but their own goverment and courts. Shit is going to hit the wall.

    And with the latest GGF buyout news and suspected inside trading with stocks, losing in swedish courts and everything happening with them recently, this just seems like the last attemps to get the remaining money off the site.

    Personally, I would like to see them stay online and fight for the values they have (or are giving to people). But it really doesn't seem like its going to happen.

    The thing is, The PiratePirate Bay's talk about "but we only host the .torrent files, not the files" didn't work out for them. It's also pretty clear what was The Pirate Bay's purpose, along how they mocked companies asking to remove content. The point being they are clearly breaking the law and giving technical excuses for it, while the purpose counts just as good (and I'm saying this as a swedish person)

    Sadly, it seems like the world is going to more closed place again by what goverments do. I dont want USA's laws here either. But instead of the clear pro-warez propaganda of all of the Pirate Parties, they should go more for net neutrality, freedom of speech and making people understand why they should be valued and what can happen if those rights are taken away. "But we just want free warez and dont want to pay for entertainment!" is not going to work, and it is the wrong kind of agenda. You should pay for people who spend tons of it, or just not use it like any other product. Just because it can be digitized on your computer doesn't mean you should be able to get it for free.

    It's interesting to see how this develops however. Persons behind TPB have a great idea about freedom and net neutrality. It would be sad to see them getting beaten, even if I dont agree with TPB's main purpose.

    1. Re:How long can they fight it by cliffski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      what 'values' are they fighting for exactly?
      giving away everyone elses work for free whilst selling ad space?

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    2. Re:How long can they fight it by cliffski · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I agree with you in that I strongly value freedom of speech too, I just think that TPB are the WORST cheerleaders for any free-speech cause.
      The minute you lump in freedom of speech and censorship issues with torrents of The Sims and Spiderman 3, you trivialise the whole issue.

      There is a whole generation of politicians who look at people defending TPB in the cause of free speech, and see just a petty excuse for virtual shoplifting.

      Anyone who really believs in free speech online should distance themselves from a site based around viagra adverts and hollywood movie torrents.
      TPB is (and always has been) about making money. Anything else is just PR to give them covering fire.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    3. Re:How long can they fight it by sopssa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Like I said in both posts, courts in scandinavia look into purpose too and it can count a lot. I do not know how its in USA or elsewhere, but I know its so in here. But I guess if Google were being a search engine only for warez and illegal content, they would be shutdown quite fast too. Even if they have lots of DMCA issues and are linking to illegal content, they are a general search engine and do what they need by law to remove such content (and fight for net neutrality too). But its obvious what is The Pirate Bay's purpose and why everyone of their users are using it.

    4. Re:How long can they fight it by Crunchie+Frog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know, because we only use TPB for Linux distros, right?

      You're a pirate and you steal movies, music, programs, and games.

      At least fucking admit to it.

      No he's not a pirate and no he doesn't steal yada yada.

      He may be a copyright infringer, and he may be infringing on the copyright of movies, music, programs and games. There's a difference, despite what Big Money would say / like you to believe. Maybe that should be admitted, because its closer to the truth than your rhetoric.

      --
      --- Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
    5. Re:How long can they fight it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I live in Norway. Here the movies are in the movie theater months after they are released in the USA, and the ticket is very expensive (twice as much as what I have seen in France).

      There is not a single good store to buy music or rent movies online. Amazon music is not available here, and iTunes is basically stealing us with execrable rate of exchange. There is Nokia music store of course, but they don't sell movies. Hulu is not available outside the USA.

      So yes, online sharing will remains strong in Europe as long as it remains better than the commercial offer.

    6. Re:How long can they fight it by jhol13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because they are not accused of hosting the files.

      They are accused of "helping in copyright infringement". In Scandinavia helping is often a lesser crime compared to the act, but it is a crime.

    7. Re:How long can they fight it by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not to mention I'm sure there are quite a few like me that have bought MORE than we would have, thanks to P2P. I'll give an example: I'm staring right now at a complete Joss Whedon Collection in the nice DVD boxes, framed by a pair of collector figures that my late sis bought me for bookends for them. All told probably a $1000 they got out of my pocket for the set, as I bought every. single. box on release. What does that have to do with P2P?

      Simple. Where I live there was NO WB station you could receive. Zip zero nada squat. And I had seen the Buffy movie and thought it was shit. So if I wouldn't have heard about the buzz and downloaded the first couple of episodes I would have NEVER bought those shows, as who would have thought some show based on a shitty movie with some soap star could actually be entertaining? I sure as hell didn't. But I watched them, actually enjoyed the story, and when it came out on DVD I bought them. Could I have downloaded them? Sure, but then I wouldn't have gotten all the funny outtakes, the director and actor commentaries, the "behind the scenes" and "making of" documentaries, etc. in other words they provided more VALUE for my dollar, making it well worth the money to me.

      And to me that hits the nail on the head, as all the DRM in the newer stuff like BD takes AWAY value instead of giving me more for my money. And games have gotten so bad, with totally shit alpha code pushed out the door with more crashes than Win95 with a bad driver that it just ain't funny anymore. Give folks a good value for a good price and folks buy your stuff- that is as true today as it was 100 years ago. Sadly i think too many of these "entertainment" companies have decided they are "Too big to fail" and are therefor entitled to ever increasing profits, no matter if their product smells like a porta-potty at an all you can eat chili cook-off. Like the whining I read from THQ over the closing of Iron Lore "whaaah pirates whaaaah" but you know what? Their product stunk. I couldn't get Titan Quest to keep from crashing to desktop and their forums were full of "graphics failed to initialize" errors.

      So offer a good value and quit trying to shovel shit for big $$$ and watch your company make cash. It really is that simple. Hell EA got me to buy Medal of Honor: Airborne, even though I had already heard it wasn't great. How? By putting it along with MOH:Allied Assault, all the expansion packs, and Pacific Assault in a nice box with a "timeline of WW2" and a "Music of MOH" CD in a nice box and charging a fair $30 for it. But this whole buck a song and...what is it now? $59 for a game at release? In a dead economy? Fuck your customers and treat them like shit and don't be surprised that they try to fuck you back. I just don't buy BD and get my games from the bargain bin, whereas i used to love getting games on release day, but I can see where some might just adopt a "fuck them first" attitude. After all, thanks to their bribery the copyrights are.....what 150+ years now? Yep, that seems fair.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:How long can they fight it by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Commissioned works, live performance attendence fees, and donations are how it will work.

      Interesting since this is, of course, the way it used to work several hundred years ago before copyright came on the scene. The other interesting aspect is that instead of always aiming for the mass market there will now be a new market aiming at the tastes of the rich who can afford to commission works just as there was in the past. Of course mass market tastes are still catered to by live performances. Should be interesting to see whether this actually happens. I wonder if history will regard copyright as just a blip?

    9. Re:How long can they fight it by christerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are those things yours to share? If so, says who? The people who created them? I doubt it. if you are sharing something you got from another who got it from another, so there is no money or even perceived monetary loss to you or the friend who shared it with you in the first place, this makes it all moral? It is acceptable to pluck the fruit from the branch of a tree that reaches over your side of the fence, quite another to reach over the fence and snag what you know is not yours. How do you rationalize sharing that which you know was created by another at great cost without the permission of those who created it? The mind is a great thing. You can convince yourself that doing just about anything you can think of is OK.

    10. Re:How long can they fight it by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually if you wanted to check out an older series then Emule would be the place to go. They seem to be the place to catch older shows(Like Brimstone which I enjoyed and bought the uncut set of on DVD) because the mule doesn't just "die" like the torrents do. Plus they somehow seem to get the really rare and weird shit that nobody else does. Example- one of the things that sold me on "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" was they have the actual pilot (never released, even on DVD) for "The Harvest" which had a completely different actress playing Willow. Seeing that it was the writing that was good, as I found both versions to be enjoyable (but will admit I prefer Alyson Hannigan as Willow) it just helped seal the deal for me buying it.

      So if you are wanting to catch a season of a show to see if it is worth buying the box set, try the mule. The quality is decent for OTA captures, and you can get the episodes for a complete season of even the older/weirder shows (like Brimstone in my case). Sure they are OTA captures and occasionally still have the commercials, but since you are like me and just wanting to sample to see if it is worth purchasing this shouldn't be a problem. They are also good about older games, which turned out to be a lifesaver in my case when disc three of the LOTR: Battle for Middle Earth 1 got knocked loose in the box during a move and scratched all to hell. I just replaced the missing third disc and all was good. Taught me to rip all my games as .MDF the second I get them home though.

      Just seems so stupid they haven't jumped on this IMHO quite obvious revenue stream. Offer me say...every game more than 2 years old for $5 a month with NO DRM, so I don't have to go looking for cracks for every game like I do my games now (I have XP X64. The games work great while the &^%&^%$ DRM don't) and say another $5 for every song more than 2 years old, another $5 for every TV show/flick, and just look at the revenue stream they would have for the older stuff. And it could be used to lure new customers into buying the newer releases, like the box set of MOH got me to pony up for Airborne. It just seems to me these corps have developed what I call the "too big to fail" mentality where they think their shit don't stink and they are entitled to ever increasing profits with zero overhead thanks to digital distribution. News Flash: $1 a song for a digital download is buttrape. same with charging the same price for a game download that you would if I bought it with the nice box and booklet at Gamestop. Treat your customers fairly, give them a good value for their dollar, and you will rake in cash. Why is that so damned hard for corps to understand?

      I don't steal (infringe, whatever you want to call it) and if it ain't worth the cash i just don't bother. But there are those that do. Instead of beating them with a club, wouldn't it make more sense to make them customers? Short of something like System Shock or The Beatles I doubt they are making much of anything on stuff older than 2 years, especially games. By giving an "all you can eat" buffet at a fair price you could not only make profit on the older releases, but as I said make even more money by using the system as a vehicle to advertise new releases and to offer tie ins and incentives to get folks to buy at release. Doesn't that make more sense than trying to bash folks over the head with ever nastier DRM infections (and if you have seen what Starforce+SecuROM+Safedisc installed on a system does then you would know it IS an infection) and trying to buttrape them on price at every opportunity? And I apologize about the length, but this is a subject I feel strongly on and it seems to me we are heading in the wrong direction on this.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re:How long can they fight it by Pofy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >BUT most countries have their own laws that regulate the same things as DMCA.
      >In Sweden we got the wording of most of those laws as directives from EU (EU
      >Copyright Directive, Electronic Commerce Directive and a myriad of in scope
      >more limited directives), mixed up with our own soup of old pre-EU laws.

      There are in my opinion some huge differences though. If we look at the Swedish copyright law, it does not have "access" in its law the way the DMCA has. Thus it doesn't create a new indirect right to the copyright holder of accessing. It is stricly for copyright related actions of which access is not one. In addition it is very clear in that if you mix protection that DO fall under the law with protection that does NOT (for example acess, region coding), the law no longer covers the part that would otherwise have been covered.

  2. What is the point? by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to see TPB's revenue streams, and if they are actually profitable or even break-even in any way.

    I mean, I can understand fighting against the MAFIAA in some respects, but this is getting ridiculous. It's like people just pirate for the sake of pirating, just to stick it to "the man" so to speak. But then you have to question why they started pirating in the first place? I mean, are they seriously denting retail sales all that much? It doesn't seem like game and movie companies are all that concerned overall, (films especially), and films are still earning tens and hundreds of millions of dollars on movie release weekends.

    I am just saying, if they are trying to prove a point or communicate a message, there has to be a better way.

  3. Just use wikipedia by FunkyELF · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Forget DNS... just publish the most recent IP address in the Wikipedia article on The Pirate Bay.

    == last known address ==
    [12.34.56.78 Clikz here 4 teh warez]

  4. I wonder if their political party by G00F · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if them getting involved in politics is what is causing them to be more of a target that previously?

    Think about it, it wasn't that long ago they where untouchable, but since they formed their own party they are actively in court all the time, getting their equipment confiscated, or some other blow dealt against them.

    --
    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
  5. Re:Arrogance and stupidity in the same package. by dunezone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The stunts are part of their public image. It's not stupidity. People who are otherwise unbiased are likely to find their positive, humorous attitude more appealing than the strict suit-only approach of their opponents. They are, most likely, very well aware of what they're doing.

    And look at how well that did for them. They had two options, they could have worked with these industries and tried to make a deal with them or they could have fought the system. They decided to fight the system but they fought the system like children and were treated like children by the system.

    And as a sidenote I always found it funny that people defended them by saying it hosted legimate material which is true, but the site itself is called, "The PIRATE Bay" and the majority of the top 100 was pirated material.

  6. Re:By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why does dated and old software gets tossed aside in your reasoning but dated and old music, TV shows and movies do not?

    The software industry is like Hollywood too,their games is all they have.

    If Hollywood stopped releasing crap they would get more people to pay for it. If Hollywood stopped wasting millions in production costs they would get more profits from their products.

    Hint to Hollywood: stop caving at the actors demands. They don't want to play for $200K, some other actor will. Movies should be about the stories not the fucking morons who play the characters.

  7. Patronize us by neo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quoting a very funny website:

    "A short patronizing history
    Before the growth of the merchant class, nobility used their money, power, and influence to promote ideas through the use of patronage. If they favored an artist, philosopher, musician, writers, orator, scientist or even a jester, they would patronize them and in this way their ideas would flourish. The patrons, who were often egotistical, would take credit for the ideas and would circulate them to further their own fame.

    After the growth of the merchant class, nobility lost sole control over money, power and influence and patronage was partially replaced with commerce. Artists, philosophers, musicians, writers, orators, scientists and even jesters were forced to please many people instead of just one in order to survive. Spreading their creative ideas became much harder because they did not have the money, power, or influence of the nobility.

    With the advent of marketing artists, philosophers, musicians, writers, orators, scientists, and even jesters were forced to associate with advertisers, distributors, branders, promoters and other middlemen in order to reach an audience. In essence these marketers became the new patrons."

    htttp://quityourjobday.com

  8. Isn't it amazing how goverments dance to the tune? by erroneus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Keep your eye on the big picture here. Swedish law did not and still does not consider what The Pirate Bay does to be illegal... not directly anyway. And the fact that they were convicted of aiding the act of copyright infringement without first charging anyone of "the primary offence" is pretty suspect. (Shouldn't the charge of aiding in a crime first have to identify a specific crime having occured?)

    But consider the flow of events and how these things are happening. The **AAs are petitioning the U.S. government representatives to apply pressure to the Swedish government to take all of these actions. Their [the Swedish government] first actions against The Pirate Bay and the official communications prior spells out pretty clearly what's really going on. The Swedish actions failed because their own laws do not outlaw what they are doing. There have been attempts at getting laws passed and they don't seem to be passing and so it's becoming really difficult for the people behind this (the **AAs) to get the results they have been paying for.

    So what I am trying to point out here is that it is utterly amazing how this is all happening. The Swedish government is compromising its own integrity at the demand of the U.S. government (and probably with incentives from the **AAs as well) who is acting on behalf of businesses that operate in the U.S. I can't say that "this is corruption" but I can say it doesn't look, smell or feel right.

  9. For the tin-foil hatters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It is no coincidence that these events (court case, ISP block) are unfolding during a global recession. Some media company or association thereof have undoubtedly provided the swiss government with a fresh influx of currency.