Slashdot Mirror


After Canadian Prodding, Facebook To Change Privacy Policy

Retardical_Sam writes "Facebook has agreed to make changes to protect users' personal information on the social networking site, including the way data is accessed by third-party developers, Canada's privacy commissioner said Thursday. Canadian officials have been negotiating with Facebook since the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a report a month ago that argued the social network breaches Canadian privacy law. Facebook agreed to make changes dealing with third-party applications like quizzes and games, deactivation of accounts, the personal identification of non-users and accounts of users who die."

14 of 64 comments (clear)

  1. Permanent Deletion? Maybe? by meheler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe now I can finally tell them to permanently delete my account from the databases. Maybe? I hope so..

    1. Re:Permanent Deletion? Maybe? by RobVB · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem is that they've allowed third party developers to access your information, so their database probably isn't the only database that has your information anymore.

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
  2. Re:Will they make the changes globally? by manitoulinnerd · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article:

    'The company also said the changes will be rolled out worldwide because some of the concerns raised in Canada have also been raised by privacy watchdogs in other countries.'

    --
    Burn Bright or Fade Away
  3. But I like it this way! by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I like broadcasting all my personal info to all sorts of commercial interests. I like being exploited by the large faceless company.

    Joking aside, I suspect this will have very little in the way of practical change. For example, according to TFA the changes will among other things "Prevent games, quizzes and other applications developed by third parties from accessing information until it obtains express consent for each category of personal information." Most users aren't going to think hard about this and will simply click through repeatedly. People almost never bother reading warnings or paying much attention to them. Technological change can't do much to deal with a population that either doesn't understand or doesn't care how vulnerable it is.

  4. Re:Nuts! by RobVB · · Score: 3, Informative
    From the news post:

    Facebook agreed to make changes dealing with [...] accounts of users who die.

    FTA:

    Facebook has specifically agreed to: [...] Clarify in its privacy policy that it will retain a user's profile after the user dies so friends can post comments and pay tribute.

    They didn't say they would protect the privacy of the dead, just that they would change the way they deal with people's profiles after they die.

    --
    I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
  5. Re:Nuts! by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Has Canada gotten so messed up that they actually believe the dead have privacy rights?

    Why not? Copyright doesn't expire on death so why should privacy?

  6. Re:When pigs fly by RobVB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, but they did make people think their information would only be accessible by the friends they selected. False marketing much?

    --
    I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
  7. Re:When pigs fly by Haffner · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or, you know, by your friend or total strangers who take a picture of you.

    --
    "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
  8. Fair trade by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd happily give Facebook my name, address, social security number, and checking account information if they would only introduce a "HIDE ALL QUIZZES" feature.

    God, I am so sick of logging into Facebook only to find the feed populated with stupid quizzes like "What type of garden tool are you?" The quizzes are far more annoying than the apps.

    1. Re:Fair trade by Gitcho · · Score: 3, Funny

      Please send me your full name, address, date of birth and the email address you used to register for our Garden Tool(tm) quiz and we will happily remove you from our mailing list!

  9. Re:Will they make the changes globally? by Garbad+Ropedink · · Score: 5, Funny

    What a radical idea. It'd have to come from a crazy place like Canada. 'Privacy'... What an odd concept. What's next? Universal healthcare?

    --
    And that was the last Terry Fox run I ever participated in.
  10. Re:Let the negotians commence! by hesiod · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can tell someone who doesn't really understand reality because they refer you to Atlas Shrugged.

  11. RFID too by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Another issue the privacy commissioner is dealing with will likely bring a smile to the /.'s here: the absolute pants security of RFID systems in travel documents.

    The problem came to a head because the DHS in the states demanded that border-crossing documents have RFID devices with biometrics in them. We used to be able to use our driver's licenses, but now we need a passport. They wanted that flexibility back, because it's so much less hassle to get a license than a passport, so the Ontario DOT agreed to add the RFID to the new driver's licenses. It's going to be phased in, but unless you want the rubber-glove treatment, you'll want one sooner rather than later.

    Everyone's been complaining about the security of these systems, but it fell on deaf ears. Until the Ontario commissioner got involved, that is. After brick-walling against the DHS she then got the Ontario DOT to issue RFID-proof wrappers with the cards. She admits they're less than ideal, thought.

    The longer term solution that she wants to implement is a portion of the card that acts as a capacitive switch, only turning on the RFID when you hold it. They'll put one on the corner of the card, with a little graphic saying "hold here while reading". When it's in your pocket the RFID will be dead, so surreptitious scanning is difficult, or impossible. I thought this was a particularly elegant solution.

  12. Re:When pigs fly by wsanders · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Your information will only be visible by your friends, they fixed that. Except your picture will appear in *their* spam ads for penis enlargements and credit scams.

    I don't do any Facebooks apps, and won't until their privacy settings are more fine grained than "yes" and "no".

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"