Slashdot Mirror


TwIP - An IP Stack In a Tweet

Adam Dunkels writes "Inspired by the Twitter-sized program that crashes Mac OS X, I just wrote a really, really rudimentary IP stack called twIP, small enough to fit in a Twitter tweet. Although twIP is very far away from a real IP stack, it can do the first task of any IP stack: respond to pings. The entire source code can be found in this 128-character-long tweet. For those who are interested in low-level network programming, a code walkthrough with instructions on how to run the code under FreeBSD is available here. The FAQ: Q: why? A: for fun."

9 of 81 comments (clear)

  1. Article mod: -1 Overrated by Looce · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The underlying system must provide a way for user programs to receive and send IP packets.

    This is where I stopped reading. Just... no. This is just a program that echoes every single thing back to the originator.

    1. Re:Article mod: -1 Overrated by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I've got a program for the author that fits in a tweet:

      #include
      int main() {
          puts("You're a moron and a braggart.");
      }

  2. Relevance check please by flowerp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shit doesn't smell like roses when it is made to fits into a tweet or is in any other way related to Twitter.

    --
    --- Eat my sig.
  3. Addendum by Looce · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Haha! This article is rated purple (2 levels above the lowest -- black) already. Wow.

    Anyhow. The fact that the TwIP program requires an IP stack to work is the prime indication that it doesn't really do all that much. Since it can work with raw socket access, and switches the addresses around, well, props, but TFA's "header" code comment says this:

    updating the ICMP checksum

    which is then contradicted by the code comment before the address swap:

    Since we only swap bytes in the IP header, we do not need to update the IP header checksum.

    using ICMP and IP interchangeably..?

    timothy, take this down. Now. It's your only chance to save face with this article.

    1. Re:Addendum by cyberstealth1024 · · Score: 4, Informative

      where are you seeing these "rating colors"?

      i didn't know either, so i looked it up -- it's the /. firehose quality filter. When you're logged in, you can see the popularity color on the left side of the summary heading. You can also increase/decrease this rating. See screen cap. Also, when browsing the front page of /., you can filter based on the color...see top-right of screenshot. The rating colors are ROYGBIV + Black. Red is the highest (most popular), black is the lowest. submitted articles initially have the color rating of blue.

      I had seen the color filtering before on the front page, but never looked into enough to find out. I learned something new. Hope you did too!

  4. Re:I hope this isn't a new trend. by pathological+liar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you converted Apache into a web browser that might actually be worthy of a story...

  5. It's not an IP stack by k2dbk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not an IP stack at all (and requires one to function). It replies to a packet that is assumed to be a ping without any error checking. In other words, it's a very short, clever, but minimally functional ping function. The fact that it's short is nice, but that's about it.

  6. similarly big accomplishment by AlgorithMan · · Score: 4, Funny
    hey, I wrote a webbrowser in 8 bytes of BATCH: here's the source code:

    IEXPLORE

    impressive, huh?

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  7. Re:At least 3 ways to make it smaller: by Mozk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, but for(;;) loops forever, whereas while(1) only loops while 1 is true. It's completely different! What if 1 becomes false?!

    --
    No existe.