Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Woman Fired For Using Uppercase In Email

Posted by samzenpus on from the don't-type-angry dept.

tomachi writes "An accountant in NZ has been awarded $17,000 NZD for unfair dismissal after her boss fired her without warning for using uppercase letters in a single email to co-workers. The email, which advises her team how to fill out staff claim forms, specifies a time and date highlighted in bold red, and a sentence written in capitals and highlighted in bold blue. It reads: 'To ensure your staff claim is processed and paid, please do follow the below checklist.' Her boss deemed the capital letters too confrontational for her co-workers to read after they woke up from naptime."

4 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. Darn you, Slashdot! :-) by aardwolf64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    See what you did? You made me RTFA just to see if it actually mentioned naps (it doesn't, btw.)

  2. Re:There must be more to this story... by ktappe · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you RTA, there was more to the story. The woman (allegedly) had a history of confrontation with her coworkers. But she was never reprimanded for those; just summarily fired with no warning and the only "evidence" the employer could dig up was this single e-mail. Basically the employer blatantly mishandled the entire situation and was left grasping at straws, trying to use an e-mail as justification.

    In short, she wasn't just fired for the caps in the e-mail; it was simply claimed she was.

    --
    "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
  3. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by rssrss · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unfortunately, it is required by law in certain contract clauses:

    See, e.g. Uniform Commercial Code Section 2-316 (2) requirement that exclusions of warranties be "conspicuous" and the definition of that word at Sec. 1-201 (b)(10).

    Sorry to go statutory on you, but I don't like all caps any more than you do.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  4. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by reebmmm · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a lawyer, and I'll be the first to admit that many of my colleagues do little to help themselves when it comes to being end user friendly. The blocks of all caps being a sure symptom of that. A site about contract drafting style actually had a pretty good discussion regarding the conspicuousness requirements and the use of all caps: http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/02/04/all-capitals/

    In my opinion, the all caps paragraphs are merely remnants from a time when contracts were drafted without the assistance of word processors capable of doing bold face type. And, frankly, that wasn't that long ago. Many lawyers that I know continue to cut and paste the boilerplate language or modify the boilerplate language keeping in tact whatever drafting convention was used originally.

    That said, there is also some advantage to using all caps over bold face for when it comes to OCR, text translation, format-less archiving, etc. In that case, the "conspicuousness" is maintained (i.e., all caps), even if the formatting is dropped. It's a very weak advantage.