Slashdot Mirror


Sony To Put Chrome On Laptops

consonant writes "FT is reporting that Google has reached a deal with Sony to ship Chrome on the Vaio line of PCs. Google confirmed that Sony PCs carrying Chrome had started to go on sale and said it was in talks for similar deals with other computer makers. It said the arrangement was 'experimental' and part of wider efforts to boost distribution, including a deal to make Chrome available to internet users who download the RealPlayer software and the company's first use of television advertising. While mainstream media coverage and financial details were very sparse, El Reg terms it a 'Microsoft-snubbing deal.' Google also mentioned it was pushing for similar deals with other vendors. Could this spell the beginning of the end for IE?"

12 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. For those who don't read the article by EponymousCustard · · Score: 4, Informative

    It refers to the Chrome browser, not the OS

  2. Let's get this straight... by operator_error · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google *paid* Sony to pre-install Chrome, just like Symantec pays for Norton bloatware to be pre-installed on HP (etc.) notebooks. There seems to be a sort of OEM market here; for years already. Nothing to see here; move along.

  3. Or? by trifish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Could this spell the beginning of the end for IE?

    Or the end of privacy?

    1. Re:Or? by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Could this spell the beginning of the end for IE?

      Or the end of privacy?

      You mean that hasn't happened yet???

  4. Old news by Graelin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I purchased a Viao a few months back and was surprised to see Chrome appear on the desktop instead of IE. If Google wants to buy browser market share more power to them. I had not tried Chrome before and I'm glad I have, its a great browser.

  5. Why must every article sensationalize "the end"? by RingDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm all for Google getting Chrome on to vendor boxes, but it's not likely going to "end" IE. Nor should it! It should open up more competition and force MS (Chrome and Fire Fox too!) to improve their standards compliance though.

    If Chrome manages to "end" IE's existence, how are we as consumers helped? We're stuck with Google overlords instead of MS overlords? Wow, that's a great improvement...

    We are much better served by having multiple main stream browsers that all force each other to maintain tight adhesion to standards and to continue to push innovation.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  6. Re:Chrome OS? by randomsearch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't you think the confusing naming is deliberate?

    Long-term strategy must be to build a brand. A few years down the line:

    "I use Chrome to surf the internet" says person in electronics store. "Oh, you'll love this phone/pc/tv/netbook/washing machine, then... it has Chrome OS".

    "I'll take that one, the Chrome thing."

    Result: Google is King.

    RS

  7. Bad Title by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I first read it, I thought Sony has gone off the deep end and added more "bling" to their laptops.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  8. Re:Head asplodes by erpbridge · · Score: 4, Funny

    What happens when Good [wikipedia.org] and evil [wikipedia.org] combine?

    Good+Evil = Goovil?

  9. Re:Chrome Won't Make It In The Enterprise by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Windows, Chrome installs itself into the user's profile folder under the Local Settings folder, rather than into the traditional Program Files folder location.

    This appears to be done to try to circumvent user restrictions, often imposed by network administrators to prevent users from installing unauthorized software. While this may work in some settings, any well crafted software restriction policy will prevent this attempt to bypass security restrictions.

    As well, by failing to follow proscribed methods for installing software on Windows, Google is actually making it difficult for enterprises that might choose to distribute Chrome on their networks.

    Per-user installation is a well-documented feature of Windows Installer, and is one of the "proscribed methods". It's not a hack or a workaround for anything.

  10. Re:Not the end for MSIE. Just more crapware. by TheBig1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For once I would like to see a computer with just the OS and a disk of things that "could" be installed by the user. Let the machine run as fast and as efficiently as possible to begin with.

    And that is why I just replaced my laptop OS with a Debian Testing Netinstall; only the software which I want is installed. 8-)

  11. Re:Head asplodes by toolie · · Score: 4, Informative

    You have to be joking. Chrome is open-source. You can go and look through the source and VERIFY that it's not sending anything about you home.

    Seriously, go look. We'll await your admission of being wrong.

    According to the Chrome Wikipedia article, there are several tracking methods in Chrome, one is not optional, several are optional. The scary one is the RLZ Identifier.

    The RLZ Identifier is non-optional, it can send back anything it wants in an encoded string, and it sends stuff back to Google 1) every 24 hours, 2) or on every Google search query, or 3) when a 'significant event' (no definition except 'such as a successful installation') occurs. Some of the stuff Google admits to being in there is the installion date, when the first time you used certain features and where you downloaded the install files from. The RLZ parameter is stored in the system registry (yay) and can be updated at any time Google wants. Another fun fact:

    The code that makes this work is not included in the open source project (http://www.chromium.org) because it only applies to the version of the browser that Google distributes, Google Chrome.

    From Google itself on the RLZ Parameter.

    So tell me again how it isn't tracking you?

    --
    -- toolie