Military To Spend $42M To Build Advanced Network Control
coondoggie writes "BBN, which was bought by defense giant Raytheon today, got almost $11 million to help build self-configuring network technology that would identify traffic, let the network infrastructure prioritize it down to the end user, reallocate bandwidth between users or classes of users, and automatically make quality-of-service decisions.
The advanced network technology is being developed by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and will include support for features like 32 levels of network traffic prioritization that will let data with a higher priority will be handled more expeditiously than traffic with a lower priority."
$11M to reimplement IPv6 QOS. I suppose it's a bit more advanced since it makes QOS determination based on users or groups, but that doesn't seem that difficult.
Consider me unimpressed.
You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
Your post.
They're talking military networks so low priority traffic would be non mission/time-critical traffic. For example, email with a bunch of power point slides for a briefing might be low priority traffic, whereas an Alert for an incoming cruise missile to the Command and Control Systems might be considered slightly more high priority.
Early experiments using the STFU protocol showed that network traffic went to zero. While this had positive cost impact, for example because you could omit all those costly cables without further harm, it was finally concluded that data rates above zero had enough advantages to offset those costs.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
I'm counting the new Internet Control Czar in the White House to use this to shut down the Internet as-needed for "national security" or other "emergencies" so I'm going to dust off my old BBS software and install another landline.
Well, every manager knows that power point slides have always the highest priority. Fuck those missiles.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
if it isn't, an awesome example of government stupidity, since just as this thing gets off the ground, ipv6 will probably finally take over
it it is ipv6, look for ipv6 to be mandated on the industry
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
we hear the death knell of net neutrality.
The corporate think-tanks that envisioned the internet have known for a long time they had unwittingly created a network without strong authentication. This means anyone can jack-in anonymously and spread whatever socially dissident or commie/terrorist agenda they want. So in the interest of controlling our minds and the accessibility of information they are now attempting to re-implement the internet and in doing so shape traffic along arbitrary guidelines which of course will be entirely influenced by corporate profiteering.
I know that this project is only for military use, but it is only a matter of time before corporations are lured in by the promise of an unprecedented amount of power/control/oversight on their networks.
to move net neutrality to /dev/null
Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
Oh! You mean like marking P2P as "low priority" during peak usage hours...oh wait...
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
This has a lot of complicated requirements. If you scan through the pdf "DARPA's Military Networking Protocol" link in the article I don't see how this doesn't extend well beyond 3 years and $42 million. E.G. "As deliverables, performers must provide protocol implementations that replace or modify both the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) for the user level devices and the Network Controllers."
Throw in the pace of defense companies move and it would be a miracle.
Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
The lowest bidder.
An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
The DoD is big into what they're calling "Network-Centric Warfare". US doctrine relies heavily on information dispersal and access.
This is (currently) an effort to make sure the right info gets into the right hands on the battlefield.
General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.