Slashdot Mirror


iPhone App Wins Microsoft-Campus Programming Contest

imamac writes "Startup Weekend was a 54-hour coding marathon held on Microsoft's campus last weekend. It was designed to encourage the use of MS programming technologies. However, the winner of the contest was an iPhone app: '"Awkward," whispered Startup Weekend organizer Clint Nelsen into the microphone upon announcing the top vote getter.'"

13 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Startup Weekend NOT An MS Event by cmholm · · Score: 4, Informative

    The parent used a poor choice of words. Startup Weekend in general isn't an MS program, only the BizSpark program that helped organize this particular event.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    1. Re:Startup Weekend NOT An MS Event by bonch · · Score: 4, Informative

      Microsoft sponsored the event, and it took place on the Microsoft campus. What was incorrect about the wording of the summary?

    2. Re:Startup Weekend NOT An MS Event by woan · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was there. The last two in Seattle were at Adobe and Google. Many thanks for MS for sponsoring this. Other than to win the prize, I think everyone would agree it would be stupid to target Windows mobile phone users. The fan favorites actually did both a Palm Pre and iPhone version of their app. Both the MS sponsored prize (preannounced for best team on MS platform) and the incubator (most promising business model) sponsored prizes went to the SearchKick team on the MS platform. I think 13 or so of the 15 teams ended up building on the MS platform with lots of first time SilverLight developers.

  2. Inaccurate Summary? by clang_jangle · · Score: 5, Informative
    Actually, if you follow the link the first comment on TFA says:

    Actually the Top Award was given to another startup, Search Kick. they got the MS prize but also the prize of the design incubator. the other prize, public vote, was given to learnthatname. all great projects !

    I haven't bothered to confirm it, but that's the claim.

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
    1. Re:Inaccurate Summary? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, and if you read the second comment - posted by the article's author - you'd see that the iPhone app received the most votes by far. It was not eligible for the prize money, though, since that specifically predicated it was for an app "built on Microsoft technologies".

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  3. Re:And the app does? by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's called "Learn That Name" and it's found in the second link from TFS, not the first link.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  4. Re:Is there anything by Octorian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Run 3rd party apps in the background?

    Let 3rd party apps integrate with the core software?

    Let developers distribute apps to real devices without needing Apple's blessing?

    (while not always as nice looking, other platforms don't have these limitations)

  5. Re:Encourage use of MS tech by making the SDK free by squallbsr · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, the iPhone SDK is a free download from ADC (you have access to it from the free developer account).

    The $100 is for a code signing key that allows you to put those binaries on an actual iPhone and to submit it to the app store

    --
    Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
  6. Re:Encourage use of MS tech by making the SDK free by beuges · · Score: 3, Informative

    Visual Studio Express is also free, as are the Windows and Windows Mobile SDKs. And you can develop in .net for WinMo using the .net Compact Framework, not only C/C++.

    And it doesn't cost money to deploy to a real phone or list on an app store (and you dont run the risk of having your dev costs flow down the toilet entirely because Apple rejected your app).

  7. Re:Encourage use of MS tech by making the SDK free by LaughingCoder · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can get a copy of Visual Studio Express here (it's free): http://www.microsoft.com/express/download/default.aspx

    And you'll also need this WinMo 6.5 SDK (it's free also): http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=20686a1d-97a8-4f80-bc6a-ae010e085a6e.

    FWIW, I developed for Windows Mobile / Smartphone for several years. The tools were all free. Back then they had something called Visual Studio Embedded (free of course). The best thing was I was able to write a single version of the application (a non-trivial multi-threaded, multimedia application with network connectivity) which ran on my Windows desktop as well as on Windows Mobile (aka Pocket PC) and Windows Smartphone. I did the vast majority of my debugging and testing on the desktop. Very rarely did I have to do any mobile-specific debugging, other than wrestling with the &*%^$# cell network (this was from 2001 through 2005, when pushing data through the cell network was barely functional).

    Oh, and by the way, deploying to phones is free also. I don't need Microsoft's permission, nor do I have to pay them a fee.

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  8. Re:The only way to win by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Informative

    um, you do know that you can write .NET programs in C++... right?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  9. Re:Encourage use of MS tech by making the SDK free by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1, Informative

    Insightful my fat arse. No, you cannot remove your appendix using a toothpick sticked into your left eye because your hand won't fit through the eye socket. But you can very well develop directly on a PDA which can be quite comfortable with a full keyboard and a large screen some of them have.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  10. Re:Encourage use of MS tech by making the SDK free by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

    Minimum price for the ability to do it with supported compilers is whatever Visual Studio standard costs. Like $300.00 but you can get it free if you give up a weekday and attend the exact right launch party like I did.

    There is a little known (I guess not anymore, now that I post it on /.) marketing twist that is presently in force with regard to Visual Studio: you can "upgrade" to VS Standard or Professional from any of the Express editions (which are of course downloadable for free), or from any "competing product" - e.g. Eclipse or NetBeans counts. This effectively means that you get to buy full license for upgrade price. For Standard, this is $200 - still not cheap, but I thought it's worth clarifying the number as it stands today.

    Also, if you're going to write and sell applications - i.e. you're going to run a startup - you could apply for BizSpark (technically this is on a case-by-case basis, but I haven't heard of anyone turned away) and get VS and most other Microsoft developer offerings kinda free - the only caveat that you'll have to pay $100 when quitting the program, either in 3 years, or when you make $1M in profit - whichever one happens sooner.