Slashdot Mirror


New England Prep School Library Goes Entirely Digital

An anonymous reader writes to mention that Cushing Academy has decided to leap into the future by getting rid of all the books in their library and going completely digital. Instead of dusty stacks, the library is spending close to half a million dollars to install all the hallmarks of a digital learning center. Flat screen TVs, "laptop friendly carrels," and a coffee shop are just the first step in building an area that allows students access to millions of books as opposed to several thousand. Of course, not everyone is completely sold on this move: "[Keith Michael Fiels, executive director of the American Library Association] said the move raises at least two concerns: Many of the books on electronic readers and the Internet aren't free and it may become more difficult for students to happen on books with the serendipity made possible by physical browsing. There's also the question of the durability of electronic readers. 'Unless every student has a Kindle and an unlimited budget, I don't see how that need is going to be met,' Fiels said. 'Books are not a waste of space, and they won't be until a digital book can tolerate as much sand, survive a coffee spill, and have unlimited power. When that happens, there will be next to no difference between that and a book.'"

18 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. sad by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I love computers, but I love books. This makes me sad.

    1. Re:sad by grumbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If eBook readers would be more solid and common place with everybody owning them and the whole copyright trouble and DRM issues with eBooks would be solved I could see some point in getting rid of paper books, but doing such a thing today sounds like madness. One just as to look at the numbers: They replace 20.000 books with 18(!) eBook readers...

  2. Terrible idea by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let the Ministry of Truth references fly.

    Anyway I can get any book I want digitally already. I go to the library to get a real book to take to waiting rooms and restaurants and such.

    1. Re:Terrible idea by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My son's middle school was built at the height of the 'dot-com' craze. It did not have real library (broom closet) just a bunch of computer labs. Two years ago they refit three of the classrooms next to the 'library' and built a real library full of real books.

      Indeed. In a few years, the Prep School will end up regretting getting rid of those books, as they budget money for new books for their new library.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  3. Coming to a former library near you... by Duradin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess they couldn't fit the starbucks in with all those shelves taking up space.

    1. Re:Coming to a former library near you... by Duradin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Using caffeine to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the system isn't going to help you get your recreational drug of choice to be government approved.

  4. I find it easier ... by neonprimetime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... to read a book on paper than on a computer screen.

  5. The Paper Book Remains King by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As I look around my room I see all the books that I have finished or want to read. When I have finished a paper book, I see the pages dwindling as I reach the end. The book has weight and after I've read it I feel that heft and know that I've done something worth while.

    I don't have a kindle and doubt I would ever buy one. I love turning physical pages. I like the durability. I like that I can have four books going and open at the same time. I like the book jackets and am very close to getting a novel of my own published.

    The paper book is not at all threatened by the kindle. Not in the slightest.

    1. Re:The Paper Book Remains King by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I don't have a kindle and doubt I would ever buy one.

      This is like my grandpa saying he'll never use email or the horse and buggy guy sneering at the first car.

      >The paper book is not at all threatened by the kindle. Not in the slightest.

      When was the last time you wrote a letter? Or bought a CD? Or used an old fashioned card catalog? Digital books are damn convenient and once these readers start hitting 99 dollars its really over for the paper book. What a waste of resources they are: The growing and cutting of trees. The inks. The printing, etc. And all the room they take up!

      Ironically, the only kindle owner I know is a 68 yo woman who has no love for technology. She got it as a gift and really loves it. If amazon is winning over technophobes like this then its really just a matter of time until they come around as they realize the convenience. Right near its early adopters only, but its getting there.

    2. Re:The Paper Book Remains King by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As I type this comment I have in front of me the 1892 edition of Sweet's Anglo-Saxon Reader. At the foot of page 105 I can read the signature of a Jean Macalister dated March 15 1909. This signature personalizes the particular volume across time and I feel a bond with Jean even though our only link is our common the struggle with Sweet. Kindle can never provide this. However, another question arises: What Kindle version will be required to read the 2009 ebook edition in 2109?

      I hold the same physical volume that Jean held a century ago. It requires no software or hardware upgrades to enable me to read it. No owner of this book has ever had to re-boot it because it was locked up. No one has ever had to recover it from backup. Its battery has never died. And because of its content, no one but another Anglo-Saxon scholar is likely to want to steal it. None of these statement is true for Krindle (or any other gadget).

      I think people who use electronic readers are consumers of text (and there's nothing wrong with that). But for people for whom a book has a longer life, factors other than information content, narrowly defined, are more important in determining a book's value. A book is easy to use, it's portable, robust and you own it. The last point is worth noting, since your bookseller could not legally come into your house to retrieve a book that he claims was sold to you in error.

      Summary: ebooks are useful but they certainly aren't books.

      PS: AFAIK The Oxford University Press is not planning a digital version of Sweet's classic text.

  6. "dusty stacks" - as opposed to "broken tech"? by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Dusty stacks" - hmm... you mean books which still work even though they are 5, 10, or more years old. How many people would be happy with their children learning using ten year old computers? Most tech is useless after 3 or 4 years, let alone ten years.

    Works for a super rich private school, not going to happen in the public sector.

    1. Re:"dusty stacks" - as opposed to "broken tech"? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most tech is useless after 3 or 4 years, let alone ten years.

      consumer-level tech is essentially value-less after 10 years... but it's not useless any more than a chalkboard is.

  7. Re:They better watch out! by ubrgeek · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In Soviet Russia ... this doesn't happen ;)

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
  8. Re:Books are good by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate DRM as much as the next guy but libraries seem like one of those cases where it's either DRM or no digital content at all. Without DRM I doubt that many books would be copied less than a hundred times a year per library-owned copy. It's absolutely not going to happen for commercial publishers and not going to happen with most academic publishers either.

  9. Paper vs. phosphor by mollog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I buy lots of books. And when I get access to pdf files that are user manuals, I frequently print them. Sorry, but I just don't like reading from a computer screen. I do it all day already.

    Yes, digital media is superior in many ways, but I find it easier to browse a printed document than a digital document. Perhaps it's merely a matter of technology; browsing on a computer is not as easy.

    And, I agree that browsing through books on shelves allows for serendipity. Weird, sometimes out-of-print books show up on library shelves and turn out to have unexpected value. Doing a family genealogy in Seattle, I came across a little book about grave markers in Shelby Co, Ohio. Yup, some ancestors were in that book.

    --
    Best regards.
  10. Re:Defeats the purpose of libraries by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Libraries are on their way out, we're already slipping into an information dark age. The modern library wouldn't have a chance in hell if it were invented today. I mean just imagine trying to convince publishers today to not only let people read their books for free, but to let them take them home, you'd be thrown out on your ass. We're living in a time where there's a wealth of information, but it's so locked up that you can't do anything with it unless you're wealthy.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  11. Some good points by mollog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know I'm a bit of a Luddite, but I, too, don't consider buying ebooks. And I would buy more CDs if they would lower the price to something reasonable. Like $5. But I do buy CDs.

    But you make good points. My (baby boom) generation won't be the consumers of this new media as much as the following generations.

    One of my complaints is that technology turns out to be so disposable. Today's whizzy book reader is tomorrow's broken, toxic waste. I've got old computers, old CRT monitors, old disk drives, printers, scanners, motherboards, TVs, you name it. You say that books are a waste of resources that take up space. I say books are easily recyclable and that Kindles are yet another flash-in-the-pan piece of go-seh.

    You can have my books when you pry them from my cold, dead hands. ;)

    --
    Best regards.
  12. Re:You know, I saw a lot of things coming* by tenco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My commentary: solar is the smarter choice, because we have a virtually infinite supply of it as long as this rock in space is habitable for humans.