Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Fears Carriers May Try To Undermine N900

An anonymous reader writes "Nokia is worried that networks may reject selling the N900 because it won't allow them to mess with the operating system. Nokia has previously showed the N900 running a root shell and it appears to use the same interface for IM and phone functions. Meanwhile, Verizon is claiming that 'exclusivity arrangements promote competition and innovation.' Is it too late to explain to people why $99+$60/month is not better than $600+$20/month?"

4 of 307 comments (clear)

  1. Re:it it a phone? by oh2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, its a phone. Several tech journalists in Sweden has tried it out and it DOES make calls.

    --

    Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

  2. Re:My next phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Only an american (no offense) can think something like that.
    In Europe carriers subscribe to a common standard for telephony that dates back to when the GSM was invented.
    There is *no* concept of "carrying" a phone in Europe, either the phone conforms to the network standard or it doesn't (and if it doesn't nobody sells it).
    *all* you need is a SIM card for the basic service, and a data plan if you want 3G stuff.
    Of course you can't do 3G if your phone does not support the frequencies and standards, but they are *standards* meaning the only limiting factor is whether your phone is built to use them.

    Welcome to a freer and more honest (though not as it could be) telecom industry.

  3. Re:it it a phone? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Straight from the horse's mouth.

    Look at section "Call features"

  4. Re:Great pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bullshit.

    They released two more versions as "hacker editions" -- backports of the new, N8x0-only software to the 770s dated CPU. No, not everything works perfectly, and they weren't exactly pushed out quickly, but second-class support != no support.

    Moreover, with the N8x0/N9x0 transition, they're making obvious good-faith efforts to allow community maintenance of the old OS (although this is limited due to IP issues, they're actually working to resolve these), as well as providing significant support to a community-run backport of the new OS to the old hardware (which is going quite well). The latter is especially auspicious, as a community-run backport means you never have to worry about some corporation arbitrarily ending support, whether after 1 year or 10 years.