Bootstrapping a New Technology?
djk1024 writes "I've just filed for a patent on a new approach to motion capture that is simple, cheap, easy, accurate, and portable. It's RF-based, accurate to 1 mm, and simple enough that a sophisticated hobbyist could build one in a couple weekends from plans and standard electronics. So now what? I quit my job and have been working on this full-time for the past couple of years; now I'm out of money so can't continue development on my own. I'm also not an electrical or RF guy so I can't carry out my own independent development on the electronics. I'm quite frustrated at this point. I've been in the software development field for over 30 years and have gone through a large number of startups, but always just as the head techie, and always as part of a team. This doing it alone sucks. I would love some advice on how best to go forward."
Put Linux on it, fire up emacs and send a letter to Microsoft telling them to screw themselves.
Yep, that ought to do it.
If you hadn't patented it, that is. Instead, if a hobbyist tried to do that, you could sue him.
Thanks.
No, you don't understand. He's looking for a list of things not to do by asking techies, but now you've created a paradox. You fool!
Lol. A Ph.D DOES mean something. Get real.
No problem. Your check's in the mail. I postdated it for "the day after the GNU Hurd port of Duke Nukem Forever ships."
Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
...to hypothetically sell the patent, and the hypothetical buyer.
If he'll take hypothetical money, I may be interested...hypothetically.
Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"