Slashdot Mirror


Windows 7 Reintroduces Remote BSoD

David Gerard writes "Remember the good old days of the 1990s, when you could teardrop attack any Windows user who'd annoyed you and bluescreen them? Microsoft reintroduces this popular feature in Windows 7, courtesy the rewritten TCP/IP and SMB2 stacks. Well done, guys! Another one for the Windows 7 Drinking Game."

6 of 427 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The difference is... by rastilin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rewritten software is a double-edged sword. On the one hand you are able to finally discard the truly broken sections of your previous implementation; allowing you to make massive leaps forward. On the other you're getting rid of a large list of known bugs and replacing it with an even larger list of unknown ones.

    One of the most useful features of old technolgy is that it breaks in predictable ways.

    So it's not too surprising that something like this happened. Doesn't worry me either, I have firewalls and a NAT on all my machines, no reason not to. However since it's something that happened before, it's irritating that Microsoft didn't think to check for something like this.

    --
    How do you kill that which has no life?
  2. Re:The difference is... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    really - unless the person sets the "Let Microsoft decide when and where I do updates" most of the updates WILL NOT be done. The average person uses the computer like a tv - turn it on to see the web and turn it off when done. Leave my computer on ALL NIGHT just so i can backup/run antivirus/run defrag/run etc. etc. ???

    Oh yeah these people do exist and they have 'FRIENDS' that 'KNOW' computers and 'HELP' them out by turning off that annoying UAC or giving them a 'FREE' version of office. The looks on their faces when I explain that the software they got off Limewire is infected with virus' - they can't believe microsoft would do that!!! THAT is the mentality, and that is why these attacks have always worked, and will always work.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  3. Please grow up, you're driving us away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hi. I'm an adult. I work as a software engineer.

    I cannot join in with the Linux community because of you people. You're just *too awful*. Instead of accepting that this stuff happens and it's bad, you childishly nerdsnort and start writing Microsoft with a dollar sign instead of an S, acting as if this stuff is some amazing manifestation of idiocy rather than a likely consequence of using a mainstream OS developed with time and budgetary constraints. It's going to have stupid bugs. Get the fuck over it.

    I would like to join in with the Linux community, but all I ever hear is this pathetic nyerr-nyerr-nyerr garbage.

    If you want to attract intelligent, grown-up people to Linux you need to stop doing certain things.

    1) Don't act as if users of other operating systems are less intelligent than you. It turns out that Linux-advocacy isn't the entire world, and that leaders in different fields (or even this one!) might be using Windows. They're not "lusers", they just have priorities different from your own.

    2) Don't act as if Linux hasn't had equally stupid stuff happen to it. Yes, it's a different process altogether, and I would dare say that bugs are less likely due to its open source nature, but they still happen. One that I can remember off the top of my head is Debian's guessable SSL keys.

    3) Try—for ten minutes—to give the impression that half of your time isn't devoted to bashing an OS you believe is irrelevant.

    4) For good measure try cutting out the xkcd worship and meme-spouting. We might be able to relate to you people if you acted as if you weren't cut from the same distasteful mold.

    1. Re:Please grow up, you're driving us away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The pubertal masses of Slashdot != The Linux community

  4. Re:"RE"-introducing? by moranar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you mean the problem is _less serious_ by the fact that it's been on _more_ Windows versions than stated? Maybe you mean that MS has said 'it's not a problem because this and that?'

    --
    "I think it would be a good idea!"
    Gandhi, about Internet Security
  5. Re:"RE"-introducing? by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You make it sound like a gaping security hole is alright just because it's been in the product long enough that people might have forgotten about it.

    If anything, this makes it sound like Windows 7 is the same old crap and that once again we have empty promises from Microsoft claiming that they will do things right this time.

    Windows users are like domestic abuse victims.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.