Slashdot Mirror


"Wiretapping" Charges May Be Oddest Ever Recorded

netbuzz writes "Guy kicks up a fuss at a Massachusetts car-repair shop, employees call the police, guy allegedly gives them a hard time, too, and they charge the fellow with a variety of expectable charges: disorderly conduct, resisting arrest ... and 'unlawful wiretapping and possessing a device for wiretapping.' The device? A digital voice recorder. Massachusetts is one of only 12 states that prohibit the recording of a conversation unless all parties to it are aware it's being recorded."

7 of 439 comments (clear)

  1. !wiretap by VisiX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why can't the legal system use common sense. Simply recording something is not the same as a wiretap. A wiretap implies access to conversations through some sort of technological loophole or exploit and is usually long term. If this is to be illegal then the law should refer to unlawful recording without consent.

    IMHO, it doesn't make sense that it can be illegal to record a conversation that you are part of since you have been explicitly granted access to the information (the guy is F@#$ing talking to you).

  2. Odious by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having such a recorder might be potentially important for memory impaired people on details and for the strong oral promises of con artists later denied.

  3. Re:A concealed carry law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him.

  4. Re:A concealed carry law... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The solution to this, your eminence, is to make fewer things that everyone does illegal, not to ban writing.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  5. Re:Lie to me! by Dog-Cow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most of us don't care about private people recording people in public. I see people with video cameras and such all the time.

    What we don't appreciate is someone with armed forces and the "Law" at their disposal doing the same thing.

  6. Re:Lie to me! by Stanislav_J · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is true, however, this is also the reason you don't piss off cops. Don't let them violate your rights, sure, but don't be a jerk. They will instantly acquire an almost da Vinci-like creativity for inventing reasons you've broken the law.

    They don't need to "invent" anything. Why do you think all jurisdictions have those "catch-all" laws on the books, like "disorderly conduct" or "creating a disturbance" or "being a public nuisance." These laws are deliberately vague so that if you act like a dick when the cop stops you, he's got plenty of leeway to charge you with something.

    --
    "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket." -- Eric Hoffer
  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion