Slashdot Mirror


Is City-Wide Wi-Fi a Dead Idea?

An anonymous reader writes "Remember all those projects to cover cities with Wi-Fi? The BBC wants to know what happened to them. When it comes to underground wireless data access, there are obvious issues regarding implementing a wireless infrastructure in underground stations and tunnels, but above ground the BBC suggests that it may be other advancements, such as Wimax, that have made Wi-Fi a less attractive solution. PCMag, on the other hand, suggests that public Wi-Fi isn't dead at all and will make a comeback due to the increasing popularity of Wi-Fi-enabled smartphones. So, will city-wide Wi-Fi make a real comeback, or have other technologies, such as Wimax or 4G, killed the concept for good?"

7 of 259 comments (clear)

  1. 59 square miles by The-Pheon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Minneapolis has complete downtown coverage now.

    http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/wirelessminneapolis/

    Actually using it right now to post, doesn't really seem like a dead idea from here!

    1. Re:59 square miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Minneapolis has complete downtown coverage now.

      http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/wirelessminneapolis/

      Actually using it right now to post, doesn't really seem like a dead idea from here!

      You can sign up at http://www.usiwireless.com/, its only $14.95 a month!

  2. Wifi B/G can't cut it. by WiiVault · · Score: 5, Informative

    Living in a "wifi city" (Minneapolis) I would like to comment on our municipal wifi and its utter failure. The signal is simply terrible in 90% of residences despite the massive unsightly box on the telephone poll out the window. Frankly this is thanks to the terrible range of B/G wireless. To get a decent signal we will need better tech like WiMax or some form of 4g. As it stands it is nearly impossible to get signal to everybody who wants it.

  3. Bellevue, WA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  4. Re:My experience with city-wide Wifi by tagno25 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The problem I've had with it is that each access point I've encountered usually requires a login and/or a fee to use. For example, Wifi in Starbucks requires a monthly fee from AT&T (or T-Mobile, can't remember). Across the street the library is free. The McDonalds next door charges $2.95 an hour, along with the Wendy's across the corner. The lobby in the hospital is free but requires a login that only the clerk at the front desk can provide. There is Wifi in the mall that is free.

    I think that most people would prefer an all-or-nothing approach. Give me one Wifi experience or forget it. Having to keep track of a new login method every 200-500 feet is a hassle.

    None of those examples are city-wide Wifi. City-wide Wifi would be one provider providing wifi everywhere with one login

  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. Re:How about a little reporting by jeremyp · · Score: 3, Informative

    They wanted to, but they had no wi-fi coverage in the pub where they wrote the article, so they couldn't get on to Wikipedia.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe