Slashdot Mirror


Dinosaur Auction In Las Vegas

Xerfas writes "If you ever dreamed of owning your own dinosaur, here's your chance. Possibly the most impressive natural history auction ever is set to take place Oct. 3 at the Venetian Casino in Las Vegas. Here you can find everything from the T.rex to a duck-billed dinosaur and a mammoth skeleton."

24 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. Beats ponies by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool. I can just imagine the kids yelling "Daddy, I wanna T-Rex!" :-)

    1. Re:Beats ponies by PinkyDead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tag this OMGVelociraptors!

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  2. Trolls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    From TFA:

    Fifty-one million years after the dinosaurs became extinct, Carcharocles megalodon trolled the Earthâ(TM)s seas as an apex predator

    Great, as if trolls on Slashdot weren't enough...

  3. Is our economy so bad... by Last_Available_Usern · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ..that a lot of these items are going to disappear into the hands of private collectors instead of the museums who should have them? It's sad to think of finds of this caliber not being publicly available. Maybe it's time we energize a little more funding into the arts and history.

    1. Re:Is our economy so bad... by gijoel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The real tragedy is that most of these fossils probably came from private digs. Like archeology, paleontology relies on context. The location where it was found, it's position in the geological strata, other fossils found with it. All these factors can enrich our understanding of these species.

      All that information has been lost forever now. Just so some sad sack can own a little piece of eternity.

    2. Re:Is our economy so bad... by Whorhay · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When I was a kid a golf course near where I lived was doing some digging as part of renovating their course. They discovered what has since been known as the Burning Tree Mastadon. The lead archaeologist Paul E. Hooge ended up being expelled from many of the professional organizations he was a member of, because he helped the owner find a buyer. This was an amazing find and no museums were interested in giving anything like a fair value for it. It was eventually sold for $600,000 to someone in Japan.

    3. Re:Is our economy so bad... by Quothz · · Score: 3, Informative

      The real tragedy is that most of these fossils probably came from private digs. Like archeology, paleontology relies on context. The location where it was found, it's position in the geological strata, other fossils found with it. All these factors can enrich our understanding of these species.

      Alan Detrich pulled 'em out of the ground. I can't imagine why you'd worry just because he's a lunatic. He fancies himself a sculptor, he's a staunch proponent of intelligent design who ran for the Kansas Board of Education and famously called those who oppose him "evil-lutionists", and he owns a private fossil excavation company. I can't for the life of me see any reason to be concerned.

    4. Re:Is our economy so bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "This was an amazing find and no museums were interested in giving anything like a fair value for it. It was eventually sold for $600,000 to someone in Japan."

      $600000 is probably as much or more than the entire annual acquisition budget for most museums, other than the very largest ones. Even if the museum had that kind of money they would still have to make the case to spend all of it on one specimen that year (or multiple years). It's not that museums are unwilling to pay for acquisitions, but A) the prices of fossils have been driven up *enormously* in the last couple of decades by increasingly pricey private purchases; B) usually a private donor can get a big, fat tax credit if they do make a donation for free, so it's not like they get "nothing"; and C) even if acquired, big specimens like these often take a lot of renovation of the museum (i.e. more $$$) in order to make space for them to go on display, assuming you have any space left in the building that could be devoted to it (and if you aren't going to publicly display a specimen like this after spending that kind of money, it misses half the point of getting it).

      I'm sure plenty of museums were interested, but there are practical issues to consider too, unfortunately.

    5. Re:Is our economy so bad... by bitt3n · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just so some sad sack can own a little piece of eternity.

      eternity, hell. I'm covering that trex in papier mache and glitter, filling it with hookers and blow, and making the world's most kickass birthday pinata.

    6. Re:Is our economy so bad... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget to make some air holes (he says from bitter personal experience).

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  4. Fundamental question - who owns fossils by fprintf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This comes down to a fundamental question of who owns fossils, or any natural resources for that matter. I just wonder if 50 or 100 years from now, after someone has long paid for these at auction, that society/courts/prior landowners/native peoples/you-name-an-interest-group will sue for the return of these "stolen" artifacts.

    We see this happen with art and antiquities all the time. Those things taken from their original home, either in time of war or time of peace are destined to be fought over years later. So how long will it be before society changes and it seems reasonable that one interest group gets enough support and whomever purchases the fossils will be forced to give them back, perhaps even without getting their money back.

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
  5. Surprisingly low prices by sunking2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Other than the TRex, the prices were not all that bad. Sure, out of my price range. But $500k for a triceratops (I know its something else) seems pretty good.

  6. Yawn by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wake me up when I can buy a prehistoric shark with a frikkin' slingshot.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  7. But who is selling? by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I cannot figure out who is selling these things. Was it a private collector, professional fossil collectors, or did some museum go bust? I suppose that the auction house is not obligated to identify the seller, but it would interesting to know.

    --
    The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
    1. Re:But who is selling? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Informative

      You need to read each item description.

      An auction house is running it, and as far as I can tell, each item comes from somewhere different - the T. Rex is from Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, the Shark Jaws from Vito Bertucci, etc.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    2. Re:But who is selling? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 4, Informative

      They come from different places. The description of the duck bill dinosaur (hadrosaur) says it had been owned by a Japanese museum which closed, and was then bought by a private American collector who is now selling it.

      There's another article here about the auction which mentions the T.Rex also currently being privately owned:

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32705922/ns/technology_and_science-science/

      Sign of the recession I guess that some fat cat has to sell his T.Rex.

  8. The Land Owner of the Excavation Site by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This comes down to a fundamental question of who owns fossils, or any natural resources for that matter. I just wonder if 50 or 100 years from now, after someone has long paid for these at auction, that society/courts/prior landowners/native peoples/you-name-an-interest-group will sue for the return of these "stolen" artifacts.

    We see this happen with art and antiquities all the time. Those things taken from their original home, either in time of war or time of peace are destined to be fought over years later. So how long will it be before society changes and it seems reasonable that one interest group gets enough support and whomever purchases the fossils will be forced to give them back, perhaps even without getting their money back.

    In the United States, fossils are owned by the person/entity/organization/government that owns the land they are found on. If you read each of the descriptions they tell you where the fossils were dug up. That makes a lot of paleontologists mad but that's the way it is. Read this article:

    In the United States and many other countries, fossil specimens collected on private land become the property of the landowner. Trade in these fossils is entirely legal. While many academics and institutions oppose fossil trade in any form, others take a different stance.

    Now, I think I remember reading of cases where fossils were found in places like Yosemite and illegally excavated and sold illegally but that's because the state park owned them.

    Your analogy of ill-gotten wartime loot is kind of funny. When the descendants of dinosaurs come looking for their ancestors bones, we will have to cough them up.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  9. It's a huge fraud! by EWAdams · · Score: 4, Funny

    Assertions that these "dinosaur" "fossils" are really the bones of early species are just a con. The Universe was created approximately 6000 years ago and these so-called fossils were placed in the earth by God to test our faith. He's trying to find out if we can be tricked into using those tools of Satan, logic and evidence.

    Good Creationists could call the Las Vegas police and have this auction of fraudulent material shut down for making false claims about the age of the items for sale.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  10. Re:Pedantic Note: Troll Vs Trawl by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Yeah, that's just plain bad editing. I'm pretty sure the word they were looking for is trawled which is a homophone as it is pronounced the same as "troll." Having done a lot of fishing in my youth this is a common mistake and I actually thought that internet 'trolling' was called that because it's like fishing for a response in the open waters of the internet. I know that's not the case but it seems a more appropriate origin than some fantasy description of a grotesque creature."

    You are aware that "trolling" and "trawling" are both methods of fishing, distinct from one another? The internet usage has it's roots in the 1st word.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  11. Re:IT Dept by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Modding rule No. 6: If you offer for people to mod you down, you will be modded up. If you begin your comment with "Mod me flamebait / troll / redundant, but..." you'll be modded +5.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  12. Re:IT Dept by Maquis196 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thats nothing, sometimes you can just ask for a +5 mod.

    How about it mods? +5 informative?

    --Maquis196

  13. Re: Days by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "And then, of course, you have those who say that the "creation in six days" is not to be taken literally. "

    If you can get your friendly neighborhood creationist to allow for this, that's the compromise I can usually live with for conversation. Replacing "day" which we are now pretty fierce calling 24 hours with "day" from "In *MY* day we didn't have lawns, we had to assemble the biocarbon molecules for each blade of grass by hand", then "life in six eras (days)" is fine.

    Life IS pretty neat, so sometimes it is pretty comfy to think of a Deist force that guided life that doesn't "talk personally" to people. Most of where ultra-orthodox religion gets stuck is in superlatives of God as Perfect. Replace that with "Pretty Blessed Good" and all the arguments melt away. ("Gee, we're not sure what $Deity was thinking when ___ allowed Down's Syndrome to happen, but ___ is still Blessed Good so I'll worship ____ anyway."

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  14. Re:Pedantic Note: Troll Vs Trawl by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

    Trolling is a method of fishing where one or more fishing lines, baited with lures or bait fish, are drawn through the water. This may be behind a moving boat, or by slowly winding the line in when fishing from a static position, or even sweeping the line from side-to-side, eg when fishing from a jetty. Trolling is used to catch pelagic fish such as salmon, mackerel and kingfish.

    Trolling can be phonetically confused with trawling, a completely different method of fishing, where a net (trawl) is drawn through the water instead of lines. Trolling is used both for recreational and commercial fishing whereas trawling is used mainly for commercial fishing.

    From Wikipedia

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  15. Re:IT Dept by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can also ask for this: MOD PARENT DOWN!