Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Says No TCP/IP Patches For XP

CWmike writes "Microsoft says it won't patch Windows XP for a pair of bugs it quashed Sept. 8 in Vista, Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008. The news adds Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2) and SP3 to the no-patch list that previously included only Windows 2000 Server SP4. 'We're talking about code that is 12 to 15 years old in its origin, so backporting that level of code is essentially not feasible,' said security program manager Adrian Stone during Microsoft's monthly post-patch Webcast, referring to Windows 2000 and XP. 'An update for Windows XP will not be made available,' Stone and fellow program manager Jerry Bryant said during the Q&A portion of the Webcast (transcript here). Last Tuesday, Microsoft said that it wouldn't be patching Windows 2000 because creating a fix was 'infeasible.'"

8 of 759 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I agree by commodore64_love · · Score: 1, Redundant

    You make a good point. Microsoft's other main competitor, Apple, doesn't provide service updates for anything older than 10.5 (2007). Why should MS support anything older than that?

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  2. Re:Yeah, right by plague3106 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sales of Win7 are much higher than Vista; where they are at now, it took Vista weeks to get to.

  3. Re:Yeah, right by MindKata · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Well from a security perspective, thanks to Microsoft's attitude to XP, buying XP has turned into like me buying a dog, and then I have to waste my time with updating decent firewalls just because Microsoft don't want to update their software to support us, because they use that a means to force and manipulate us into buying Windows 7.

    So much for them creating a product I want (I want them to support XP and produce more products for XP ... and not keep forcing obsolescence onto us all as a means to extort more money out of us all).

    But then Microsoft has the power to extort many people even though we all see, know and hate their tactics against us all.

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
  4. Re:15 years old by Nimey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hush, you're interrupting our fifteen-minute hate.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  5. Re:15 years old by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This needs to be the first post so people stop flaming.

    Wait, this is /. ...

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  6. Re:Yeah, right by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1, Redundant

    If you read the article you'll see systems with SP2 or SP3 are unaffected:

    "By default, Windows XP SP2, Windows XP SP3 and Windows XP Professional x64 Edition SP2 do not have a listening service configured in the client firewall and are therefore not affected by this vulnerability"

    Dont let the sensionalist summaries fool you. Afterall this is slashdot. Everything is spun a certain way. Shame on you editors.

  7. Re:15 years old by dnahelicase · · Score: 0, Redundant

    stop pointing out stuff like that. We don't RTFA!

  8. Re:Yeah, right by iamhassi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Sales of Win7 are much higher than Vista; where they are at now, it took Vista weeks to get to."

    Score:+1, Funny, since Win7 has not been released so there are no sales

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone