Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

DoJ Recommends NY Court Reject Google Book Deal

Posted by timothy on from the march-of-unprogress dept.

eldavojohn writes "The BBC and others are reporting on the US Department of Justice's recommendation to a New York court that they reject the Google book deal. The deal has received considerable attention, but for the most part it has been negative."

8 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Worst summary ever by Jurily · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Summary: OMG searchable books! Think of the copyright holders!

  2. Only a good thing if by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is only a good thing if it leads to a better arrangement. The google book deal is not ideal, but at least it gets the books out there. If as a result of this deal being struck down we have copyright reform (not likely, since at the moment people dying of lack of health care is a significantly bigger issue), then it is good. If as a result of this deal being struck down, a better deal is negotiated with Google (which is possible), then it will still not be ideal. If as a result of this deal being struck down, nothing ends up happening, which is possible, it would be worse for the world.

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:Only a good thing if by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A mechanism for individual authors to register and get paid directly, not for the money to go to a bunch of lawyers who have declared themselves to be working on behalf of those authors.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Only a good thing if by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People who die because of lack of healthcare don't die because they can't get treatment at the moment of the heart attack, it's because they A) don't have the preventative care leading up to the heart attack, and B) don't have the option to go for more expensive treatments. You're not going to get on a heart transplant waiting list if you can't afford it.

      --
      Qxe4
  3. Re:Lets just... by symbolset · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lets just abolish copyright and eliminate this problem altogether.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  4. Exclusivity is the root of all evil in this... by nweaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the settlement was "any other company may also have the same rights under the same terms", it would be a VERY good deal.

    But with the exclusivity, it is very bad. Without the exclusivity, someone else could take the time to do the scanning, and the sales. EG, Amazon, Microsoft, Yahoo, or even a new startup.

    But with the exclusivity, you give Google a monopoly over out-of-print books.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  5. Re:Worst summary ever by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, that depends. How long have you been dead and your work out of print?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  6. Re:Lets just... by BudAaron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This whole objection thing pi$$es me off! I have about 20 old books that I wrote years ago. This deal is worth anywhere from $ 1200 to $ 2000 that I could sure use but now everyone is weighing in to prevent that. I WANT my books included!