Slashdot Mirror


$2,000 Bribe Bought Password To DC P.O. System

theodp writes "While the Administration is counting on new Federal CIO Vivek Kundra to simplify and speed the federal IT procurement process, it's doubtful he'll be able to reduce red tape to the extent that a former minion of his did at the scandal-rocked D.C. Office of the CTO. Exhibiting some truly out-of-the-box thinking, project manager Tawanna Sellmon not only processed phony invoices for the contractor at the center of the D.C. bribery and kickback scandal, she also gave him the password to the city's computerized database used to track purchase orders. Sellmon pleaded guilty last week for her role in the scam, which netted her an envelope containing $2,000 in cash, as well as an undisclosed number of $25-$100 gift cards."

37 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. hmm by SatanClauz · · Score: 4, Funny

    what should I set the reserve for the database password of the state police toxicology test results?

    1. Re:hmm by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think you can still actually sell that? I mean the password is pretty obvious. UrBusteD01 seems to be pretty universal in each state.

  2. I bet... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I bet she kept the secret for 47 hours.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:I bet... by Syncerus · · Score: 2, Informative

      This wasn't a troll. It was a reference to a previous article.

      --
      "Man is nothing without the works of man" -- Helvetius
  3. Makes one think. by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you have remote access capabilities onto your Network? VPN, Citrix, not blocking GotomyPC? Has anyone at your company done the same thing, offering the competition direct access to your systems?

  4. What always astounds me about govt corruption by amplt1337 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is just how laughably cheap people can be bought for. Two grand and some gift cards? SERIOUSLY? You'd go to jail for that? When you're a project manager at a government job with great benefits, probably making more than that every WEEK?

    It's like the Abramoff scandal. People will sell out their country for Capitals tickets. It's not even the Bulls or something!!

    --
    Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    1. Re:What always astounds me about govt corruption by Kozz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...is just how laughably cheap people can be bought for. Two grand and some gift cards? SERIOUSLY? You'd go to jail for that?

      On the contrary... they would not go to jail for that. It's their own ignorance and stupidity which cause them to be so easily bought -- and to believe that they won't go to jail because they won't get caught. Criminals are not exactly known for their brains.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    2. Re:What always astounds me about govt corruption by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Two grand and some gift cards? SERIOUSLY? You'd go to jail for that?

      Dude, seriously. They were Walmart gift cards. What normal person wouldn't spend a few years at Club Fed for those bad boys?

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
    3. Re:What always astounds me about govt corruption by amplt1337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Enough to get herself a responsible management position at an important technology office. I understand your meaning, but to be qualified for this job she absolutely had a college education, possibly master's degree, and at least five years of tech-related work experience, so she's at least come to money even if she hasn't come from it.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    4. Re:What always astounds me about govt corruption by jonpublic · · Score: 4, Informative

      HA! That's nothing.

      In Detroit here we had a 1.2 BILLION dollar deal that was approved by city council only after someone got a $5,000 or $10,000 bribe. You might have heard of Monica Conyers or perhaps her husband, John Conyers.

      The way it works here is you hire a "consultant" who supposedly puts you in touch with the right people. What actually happens is the consultant pockets half of the consultant fee, and gives the other half to the person you want to influence. And then the vote changes.

      A few people are already on their way to jail, but it's nothing compared to the cost to the city and the hundreds of workers who lost their jobs as a result of the deal.

    5. Re:What always astounds me about govt corruption by Mikkeles · · Score: 4, Insightful

      'Criminals are not exactly known for their brains.'

      Well, at least the ones of whom you've heard.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  5. Re:Well, there's a shocker..... by falcon5768 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um no? She was a underling that was CAUGHT, she had nothing to do with the guy who is now the CIO. Get your facts straight before you decide to be a right wing moron.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  6. Re:makes you wonder... by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "...what kind of "EEO" bullshit got "Tawanna" cushy job as a "project manager" at the DC CTO office."

    FYI, DC is a majority black city - having a black government employee there is like having a Native American employed by tribal governments. EEO would only serve to get white and hispanic applicants hired in DC.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  7. Nice SEO slander by foniksonik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If TFA isn't a Troll I'll eat my shorts.

    What's the best way to SEO slander someone.... without getting hit by a lawsuit? Just put them in the same article with a dubious individual - make a virtual connection even if no real connection exist... then people will start discussing them together and voila - they must be close friends!

    Shameless and disgusting.

    What's worse is that the reference to Kundra was obviously added after the story was initially posted on the linked site... that text with Kundra's name isn't even in a p tag, it appears styled differently in the rendered version as well, almost like an editor went in and added it after the author had published - "Hmm we need more hits on this story, let's put Kundra's name in it... that will get hits".

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:Nice SEO slander by corbettw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      FTFA: "Until recently, the technology office was headed by Vivek Kundra, who has taken a job as President Obama's chief information officer. A White House official confirmed last night that Kundra has taken a leave of absence. "

      Sounds like the former CTO might have more bones in his closet related to this thing than has yet been acknowledged. Why else take a leave of absence because a former employee did something shady?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:Nice SEO slander by jonpublic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a fact in public life that if the people around you are dirty, some of that dirt will rub off on you, whether or not you are involved.

      Once the public's trust is broken, it's very hard to earn it back.

    3. Re:Nice SEO slander by 14erCleaner · · Score: 3, Informative

      OK, figured it out. He took a five-day leave of absence when the story first broke in March. Old news.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
  8. Let's treat this by grolaw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    as if it were what it is: treason. This, cheaply bought bureaucrat, has sold her nation down the tubes for a pittance. Sushil Bansal, the owner of Advanced Integrated Technologies, made millions. Execute all three. Especially Advanced Integrated Technologies; it's high time for corporate death penalties that leave shareholders with worthless paper. Then we may see some responsibility at the top - not just profits.

    I'm for stoning them at the base of the Washington Monument.

    1. Re:Let's treat this by gandhi_2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually, she just sold the District of Columbia's tubes for a pittance. my only regret is that she didn't sell the entire city.

    2. Re:Let's treat this by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The executives should go to jail, and the company should pay compensation (hurting shareholders out of necessity), but the shareholders themselves (retirement funds and the like) had nothing to do with the decision.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:Let's treat this by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but the shareholders themselves (retirement funds and the like) had nothing to do with the decision.

      Bullshit. That is the copout that corporations have been using forever but there are two major and fatal problems with it: 1) shareholders choose to invest in companies and 2) they have (with any brains) the voting shares, and thus the ability to change the board of directors and with it the CEO.

      So no dice. Whining that "We didn't know that our money invested in the 'White Phosphorus Bombs R Us' will actually hurt anyone! We just looked for the 200% return!" is scoring the unscrupulous assholes no points.

      Also, the stock market is a gambling casino for those with more money then brains (now more so then ever before, where company earnings or dividends have no bearing whatsoever on share price). Retirement money does not belong there.

    4. Re:Let's treat this by radish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a difference between investing in companies which publically take part in activities you personally don't agree with (such as weapons manufacture) and investing in outwardly innocent companies which are secretly breaking the law. Of course, once the illegal activity is revealed, what you do next as a shareholder is squarely on your head/conscience.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:Let's treat this by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

      as if it were what it is: treason.

      The Constitution defines treason. And this isn't it, much as you'd like it to be.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    6. Re:Let's treat this by amplt1337 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have zero problem with executing corporations, since they aren't actually people anyway. And I think that someone who engages in this kind of government corruption (er, if the other posters saying she was duped are incorrect) being sentenced to hard labor, say... but I'd prefer the state didn't go around killing people, most especially on trumped-up charges of treason. That's too easily abused; seems like a slippery slope to tyranny.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  9. How do people rationalize bribery? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there a common theme for the rationalizations of mostly-law-abiding people who accept bribes?

    The government is so big that it won't matter to them? They tax me so much, they owe this to me? Everyone else does it, so I'm a chump if I'm honest?

    1. Re:How do people rationalize bribery? by rotide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like it or not, money is pretty much _everything_ in this world. You need it to simply live. You need even more of it to live somewhat comfortably. You need even more of it to get decent health care. You need a bunch more to hold a job in most places as you'll need transportation. After you make some you'll want to make more so you can retire some day. All the while, most people enjoy consuming "stuff". Clothes, games, pictures, movies, etc, etc. All that takes even more money.

      My Point? Basically, put a person in the position of making what appears to be quick easy money and they will probably be tempted if not fully accepting.

      It's not even greed as much as it is a simple need to hoard cash. One day, you _will_ need that cash and turning down an easy sum of it is, to most people, stupid.

      Although, in the case of doing something that will easily get you a jail sentence for what amounts to a week or two of pay, is stupid.

      But we all need money and if someone offers you some and you weigh out the potential risks.. Hell, if it looks good, who needs rationalization. It's money and you accept the risk of taking it.

  10. Re:The problem with bribery by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But then you have to pay taxes on your $1,000,000,000. Raffle winnings are treated the same as lottery winnings, which are all treated as gambling winnings and probably taxable in the 30-40% range. In this case the irony would be that 1/3 to 1/2 of the bribery money would go back to the govt, and eventually be used to hire even more corrupt and inept people...

  11. Re:The problem with bribery by AlecC · · Score: 5, Informative

    Reading TFA, it looks as if she didn't sell the password, she gave it away to be helpful, and the contractor only later gave her the $2000 (and gift cards) as a present. I.e. she didn't realise what she was doing, that the password she gave him permitted him, basically, to authorise any bill he chose to submit. So she is primarily guilty of total stupidity rather than criminal intent. Maybe, for the good of the species, such stupidity should be treated as even more criminal - but it isn't.

    What this makes clear, yet again, is that the human is the weakest point in any system, and any human who has not received positive training in security is a very weak point indeed. Which says that, whatever the physical security, any government database with thousands of users, let alone hundreds of thousands as planned form some, will be subverted, for certain, within months.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  12. Re:The problem with bribery by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Still beats the hell out of a $25 gift-card, if you ask me ... but then again neither the bribers or the bribees in these two-bit, amateur-hour shows were known for competence or ambition.

    For some perspective, consider the Iraq invasion: $3 trillion (and that is just the latest estimate) in cash down the drain, all to private concerns, multiple billions of which are not only unaccounted for, but were actually delivered in form of mountains of $100, $50 and $20 bills on shipping pallets....

    And then there is the "too big to fail" multi-hundred billion cash bailout for the destitute and starving Wall Street, the specifics of which are so sensitive as to constitute a "national security" concern ...

    In short, what is on display here is the difference between professionals and hobbyists.

  13. Proof Positive that Social Engineering Is Easier by Syncerus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This article is an ideal example of a social engineering crack. Consider the comparative difficulty of a technical cracking job and compare it to the simplicity and cheapness of what actually took place. The solution was actually quite elegant in a sordid way.

    I once worked for a company that was experiencing a surge of highly organized fraud originating from Romania. Before I left, we were preparing to develop a major anti-fraud application, etc., at great expense. At one meeting I suggested that we just hire a few Romanian private detectives to knock on some doors and quietly suggest to the lowlifes that it would be healthier to leave us alone; the other people in the meeting looked at me as though I were green.

    LOL.

    --
    "Man is nothing without the works of man" -- Helvetius
  14. Re:The problem with bribery by Volante3192 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I dunno, I'd be fine with one million. Keep it in a secure location (you can afford a nice fireproof safe with that much) and just use it to augment your current lifestyle. Don't make outlandish purchases. One million in hundreds isn't that large either: http://www.cockeyed.com/inside/million/million.html

    That's the rub though: being careful with it. You can't blow it on Rodeo Drive day one. Limit yourself to a grand a month and spread it around. Can probably deposit some in your normal account occassionally. Explaining 1M at once? Problem. Explaining 1M over 20, 30 years? Much easier.

  15. Social Engineering by DrWho520 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No manner of technology can defeat good, social engineering. An intelligent attack is made upon the weakest link in the system. In this case, an unscrupulous user with privileges.

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
  16. Re:makes you wonder... by conspirator57 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    nice theory, but i grew up in DC. yes black people can and some do discriminate against whites and other groups. heck, as old as it is, School Daze was and still is relevant vis a vis light/dark black discrimination.

    however, this is probably mostly a symptom of the society of ineptitude that is DC government. your hiring manager has to have a clue and be able to vet whether an applicant actually knows the stuff their alleged degree says they should know. that hiring manager's manager is likely a political appointee, and well, you get the idea that politics might be involved.

    i also used that experience (of having grown up in DC) to express my wish on /. that Obama choose the Cisco person rather than the DC guy with 0 clue about tech and associates and underlings of "questionable" ethics. at best our CIO is clueless about managing people, at worst he's involved in the corruption, but smarter than his underlings. the latter doesn't seem hard from the behavior this lady evidenced.

    when i was in high school in DC Public Fools^H^H^H^H^H Schools, DC got a federal grant of like $10-20million to improve school access to computers, which at the time (mid 90s) consisted primarily of private corporate charity of end of life PC ATs. The government wasted the money paying contractors to "measure the state of computer and network access in the classroom". this was something a manager with two eyes and half a brain could have done in less than a month. none of the money got spent on actually putting computers in classrooms.

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  17. Re:makes you wonder... by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "nice theory, but i grew up in DC. yes black people can and some do discriminate against whites and other groups. heck, as old as it is, School Daze was and still is relevant vis a vis light/dark black discrimination.

    however, this is probably mostly a symptom of the society of ineptitude that is DC government. your hiring manager has to have a clue and be able to vet whether an applicant actually knows the stuff their alleged degree says they should know. that hiring manager's manager is likely a political appointee, and well, you get the idea that politics might be involved."

    You misunderstand; I was replying to an overtly racist comment suggesting that the only reason the person had the job in the first place was because she was black and an EEO program. I was pointing out that was impossible, as blacks cannot sue a majority black organization for "equal opportunity". The only people with grounds for that are minorities, which in DC means whites and hispanics. I was arguing that there was NOT racial bias in her hiring, not that there was.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  18. Re:makes you wonder... by amplt1337 · · Score: 2, Funny

    George W. Bush.

    Next question please?

    --
    Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  19. That is STILL nothing by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Every hear of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld? They got elected, killed many useful projects for our nation, and then awarded LARGE contracts to their friends (sight unseen). In addition, when ppl spoke up about, they were QUICKLY shut down. Bunny Greenhouse comes to mind. So many others who have spoken about the corruption and all were swept under the rug. Of course, we did catch a criminal who got a blow job, but that is a different issue all together.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  20. Re:The problem with bribery by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Start a business.

    Filter the money in as regular customer payment.

    Proper accounting you will take about 10% loss, maybe less.

    Not a bad fee to pay to be laundered.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect