Slashdot Mirror


French Deputies Want Labels On Photo-Altered Models

Psychophrenes writes "A number of French deputies are proposing to pass a law requiring all published photos that were modified by means of an image manipulation program to include a statement indicating that 'the photo was altered in order to modify the appearance of a person.' This indication is to be mandatory on all ads, packaging images, political posters and even art photos, and is considered a matter of public health, aimed at fighting anorexia." The related article is in French, but Google Translate does a pretty good job.

9 of 512 comments (clear)

  1. Porn and hamburgers by sopssa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It might be a little annoying reading a porn magazine which has the text "'the photo was altered in order to modify the appearance of a person." thrown all over it.

    But does this apply to persons only? I hope we'd finally get to know the truth about McDonalds hamburgers. Or can we count them as persons?

  2. Re:Aren't ALL photos modified these days? by raju1kabir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think the point is that you have to put it on if you "modify the appearance of a person". I would doubt that modifying the white-balance would count as this, but agree that it will be hard to choose an arbitrary point to draw the line of what does and what does not need the disclaimer.

    More like impossible, if you want it to be meaningful.

    If you've spent some time working with photographers, you know that moving a light just a tiny bit can dramatically change how much someone appears to weigh. Changing the colour of light - or even the colour of other nearby objects that reflect some light - can change someone from vibrant to sickly. And don't even get started on makeup. Labeling only an arbitrary set of electronic manipulations is at best a joke. It'll be great news for touch-up artists who still have their old-school airbrushes, though.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  3. Unintended consequeces by dbIII · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually in Australia for many years Playboy and Penthouse published nude photos with women's genitals airbrushed smooth to look like a Barbie doll. That created a generation of women that think something is wrong with them and that they should have bits cut off.

  4. Re:Awesome! by jeffasselin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Heck, how about diamonds? They're not that rare or valuable (compared to say emeralds or rubies), but DeBeers made a very successful campaign at the turn of the last century to create a market for their product by convincing women (and men) that diamonds were the only jewel worth giving as a betrothal ring.

    Heck, until Queen Victoria had a lavish, highly-publicized wedding, they were simple affairs usually involving only the immediate family and simple ceremonies often taking place at the home of the couple.

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  5. Re:Aren't ALL photos modified these days? by Anonymusing · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reminds me of the Evolution video from Dove. Apparently advertising does affect some girls, at least some of the time.

    --
    Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
  6. Re:It'd be really annoying.. by Anonymusing · · Score: 3, Interesting

    link to that Dove commercial.

    --
    Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
  7. Food styling by spun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But does this apply to persons only? I hope we'd finally get to know the truth about McDonalds hamburgers. Or can we count them as persons?

    Pictures of burgers are representative of the type of burger you can expect, you do not expect the exact burger that is in the photo otherwise they would have to take a lot of photos!

    Good for the French anyway, this can only be a positive thing.

    Food styling and photography is at least as complicated as fashion styling and photography. People at least do not dry up, wilt, sag, and turn funny colors over the course of an hour under the lights. Burgers are one of the harder foods to style and photograph. The burgers you see in photographs are not even edible. For some interesting tricks of the food stylist/photographer's trade, see here: http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=102996&catId=100406&tid=100008&p=1&title=Food+styling.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Food styling by MiscellaneousFiles · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Those pretty Big Macs don't even exist!

  8. Re:it's not men driving this phenomenon by residieu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's easier to find clothes that look good when you're skinny, because the designers design clothes for skinny people. Then they extrapolate some of those clothes out for larger sizes, where they don't look as good.