Slashdot Mirror


Carbon Nanotube Solar Cells On the Horizon

MikeChino writes Carbon nanotube news abounds as of late, and the next application for the up and coming material may be hyper-efficient and economical solar cells. Led by professor Paul McEuen, researchers at Cornell recently tested a simple solar cell (called a photodiode) crafted from a single carbon nanotube. Surprisingly, researchers discovered that more light shined on the nanotube created even more electricity, a huge difference from today's silicon solar cells where excess energy is lost in the form of heat rather than used to create more electricity."

10 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. Homer says... by Azghoul · · Score: 4, Funny

    Carbon nanotubes... is there anything they _can't_ do?

    1. Re:Homer says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      They have yet to get me a date with Megan Fox.

    2. Re:Homer says... by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny

      We need a huge ticker-tape parade for our hero, Inanimate Carbon Nanotube.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:Homer says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow! Did you actually get to _see_ the nanotube??

  2. Again with the #$##%# solar cells by McGregorMortis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not a week goes by that you don't hear about yet another breakthrough in cheap and efficient solar cells. Every week, without fail, since 1979, I swear to God. Any more grains of salt, and I'll have a heart attack.

  3. Re:The technology isn't important by kheldan · · Score: 5, Funny

    The question is, it it cost-effective?

    If someone developed a 99% efficient solar cell, would you really care what it cost?

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  4. Re:The technology isn't important by camperdave · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but you can buy tubes of silicone at any hardware store. It ain't exactly rare.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  5. Re:The technology isn't important by drseuk · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a great finding, but unfortunately, making nanotubes is a HIGHLY energy intensive process

    Obviously we need someone to invent some sort of hyper-efficient, clean and renewable energy source to power the manufacturing process then.

  6. Re:The technology isn't important by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, if somebody developed a 150% efficient solar cell I wouldn't care about cost.

    Then again, you could use such a solar cell to power some high efficiency light producing device (say, a LED) which you would point at the solar cell thus getting back more energy than you used to power the light (i.e. free energy).

  7. Re:Ooh, ooh by seven+of+five · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think it's pretty amazing, actually, that a cellphone sized computer could be used to perform (and now, perhaps even automate - as in run an autopilot program) all the calculations necessary to control a spacecraft intended to fly to the moon and back.

    There's an app for that.