Slashdot Mirror


Newly Declassified FBI Docs Reveal Predictive Data System

An anonymous reader writes 'Newly declassified documents show that the FBI is developing a data-mining system to uncover terror sleeper cells. Among the 1.6 billion records in the National Security Analysis Center — tens of thousands of travel records, including hotel and airline records. Other revelations in the documents uncovered by a Wired.com FOIA request show that the feds want to expand the system for use in cyber-crime investigations, and it's already been used to scrutinize helicopter pilots and Philly cab drivers. The system has eerie resemblances to DARPA's once-banned Total Information Awareness program."

8 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds familiar... by Captain+Centropyge · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    Bite my shiny metal ass!
  2. Today, do something out of the ordinary by HalAtWork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Do something out of the ordinary, once or twice a day. Deviate from your normal routine in very absurd and unusual ways for no apparent reason.

    1. Re:Today, do something out of the ordinary by bertoelcon · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I actually did something like that on facebook by giving incorrect feedback on ads and becoming a "fan" of stuff I hate just to see how hard it was to screw up the recomendations.

      It is actually harder than you might think.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    2. Re:Today, do something out of the ordinary by martas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      wouldn't help, unless you did something unusual regularly, i.e. usually did something unusual. for example, if a lot of people regularly acquired material necessary to build a bomb, created fake identities, got on a plane with said bomb and identity, and then didn't blow up the plane, now that would confuse them. your suggestion would just slightly increase noise in the data. hiding trends through noise is much harder than hiding trends through bias, i.e. things that look like threat in many ways, but aren't.

  3. False Positives by codeAlDente · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And how much does it ruin your life if you come up as a false positive?

    --
    He once inserted random mutations into his code, just so he could have the experience of debugging.
  4. Re:so ? by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I am sure there has been at least one nearly successful action in the US since 2001 that is utterly classified because it would tend to cause a panic"

    Why would they hide panic inducing information while simultaneously filling the airwaves with panic inducing disinformation?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  5. Sounds Like Vestigal AI To Me... by Xin+Jing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember hearing a comment back after the 9/11 attacks that the FBI database couldn't be searched like Google provides it's search queries. From that standpoint of modernization and capability, I say cheers to the FBI for making such a rebound (smells like Carnivore) 8 years later. Interestingly, or rather unsurprisingly, "The FBI declined to comment on the program."

    Now on to the AI accusations.

    "That could change if the FBI gets it hands on the data sources on its 2008 wish list. That list includes airline manifests sent to the Department of Homeland Security, the national Social Security number database, and the Postal Serviceâ(TM)s change-of-address database. There are also 24 additional databases the FBI is seeking, but those names were blacked out in the released data."

    The results of such a query aren't too far off from that of a true prototype AI, which in it's operationally completed state would provide the best prediction bang for the buck there ever was in the history of mankind. And how best to employ that fledgling AI but in law enforcement pursuit of known terrorist criminals.

    Where were they, what did they do and where are they now?

  6. Re:I've got an idea by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even those of us in English-speaking countries run into problems. Want to refer to Euros, Pounds Sterling, or Japanese Yen? Sorry, none of those characters are accepted. You can type them, but Slashcode will mangle them (after submission, not always after preview) unless you remember to use HTML entities. Want to mention the app-switching feature on OS X? I'm afraid you'll have to mangle the name to Expose, because this is what Slashdot displays if you type it correctly: Exposé.

    There were two reasons for blocking unicode (which used to work). One was people signing up with names that were almost the same as other users but with similar glyphs. That is trivial to fix; only permit ASCII for usernames. The other was people putting things like the right-to-left reading order character in the middle of their post, inverting the order of the rest of the page. That is easily fixed by a simple blacklist on the range of unicode characters that controls formatting.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News