Slashdot Mirror


Honda's Answer To the Segway

lcreech writes with an excerpt from the Daily Mail's description of a new Segway-style one-person vehicle being shown off by Honda: "The vehicle looks like a very modern unicycle and to ride it you simply lean your weight in the direction you want to go, whether that's forward, backwards or even sideways. It maintains its own balance travelling up to 3.7MPH. Not very fast."

17 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. Good and bad, computer chair version and some beer by sopssa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lets be happy that we're probably the last generation that can watch how the beautiful girls walk on street in their red dresses and nice legs and ass. Sooner or later this will be reality, in a bad and a good way. While convenience is nice, it has bad sides too.

    That being said, I would so use this. Can I get a comfortable computer chair version too, so I can get a beer easily (and one of those japanese beer serving machines please )

  2. Just what America needs! by Kirin+Fenrir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can do one better. My invention has two wheels, and is entirely human-powered. It's good for the environment, and has a max speed of around 25mph! (legs willing).

    I'll call it: a bicycle.

    --
    Caffeine is my anti-drug!

    Duranin - A NWN2 Roleplaying Persistent World
  3. Re:Creepy -- and SAD by citabjockey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More evidance that we are just too fat. We need this like we need another McDonalds on the next corner. Our feet are also "designed to be small, safe and unobtrusive enough to mingle with pedestrians or use indoors",

  4. self-filtering user group by gobbo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you're intrepid enough to sit on a motorized unicycle, automated stabilizers aside, you're very likely able and willing to walk 4mph. So, it's no surprise they don't plan on bringing it to market.

    However, nice proof of concept as a base for robots.

  5. Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Something like this would be very useful for people with mild to moderate mobility problems (e.g. the elderly, people with neurological disorders, people recovering from an injury). It would be perfectly fine for moving around a home, hospital, grocery store, etc. In these kinds of environments, 3.4 mph is a perfectly good speed.

  6. Re:Good and bad, computer chair version and some b by Kokuyo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nice legs and ass? Dude, where do you live and how do your real estate prices look?

    Since bone-skinny has become synonym for sexy, healthy and so on, it's become hard to even FIND women with boobs or asses AT ALL. And the legs? Straight sticks, man. Nothing curvy about that! On the plus side, their hips can easily be used as hooks for your jacket...

  7. Proper response to Segway: by qw0ntum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    *point and laugh*

    Seriously, though. Years late and... conspicuously not needed?

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
  8. Re:Good and bad, computer chair version and some b by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lets be happy that we're probably the last generation that can watch how the beautiful girls walk on street in their red dresses and nice legs and ass.

    "Probably"? Bicycles, roller blades, cars, and segways have failed to prevent this sight from occurring.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  9. The way this works is cool. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While in general this thing is completely pointless, the way the wheel itself works is really cool. It's composed of cylinders which form the ring for the main wheel but allow sideways movement. Leave it up to the Japanese to dream up the most useless application for advanced technology, but it's cool that they're exploring unconventional concepts.

  10. Re:Good and bad, computer chair version and some b by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't worry, I'm sure that when horses were first tamed someone bemoaned the loss of walking. I imagine the same thing happened when the carriage was invented, and the bicycle, and the automobile. Pretty girls will still walk, and when they don't they usually get fat, anyway.

    Nothing to worry about in that respect.

  11. Correct me if I'm wrong... by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FTA: The single wheel on the U3-X is made up of many tiny motor-controlled wheels, packed inside the bigger wheel, allowing the device to swerve in any direction.

    Unicycle: A unicycle is a one-wheeled human-powered vehicle.

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
  12. Re:Been done already... by dlsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's hardly the same thing, although it may fit the description in the summary. If you watch the video, you'll see that the Honda vehicle allows the rider to glide around in any direction, kind of like a wheeled stool; the unicycle you're linking to only moves in one dimension (forward or back). It also doesn't maintain left/right balance at all.

    It should go without saying that these three self-balancing vehicles—the Segway, the Honda vehicle, and your unicycle—are designed with significantly different applications in mind, despite sharing some similar technology. The Honda vehicle seems best-suited for maneuvering indoors, not as a replacement for your car/bike.

  13. Re:Good and bad, computer chair version and some b by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The girls who need to ride something around instead of walking reasonable distances don't stay beautiful for long.

    Now, there's nothing quite like pretty girls in skirts riding bicycles.

  14. Stone Age Tech... by jameskojiro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just read the comic B.C.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  15. Re:Yes, but where is the "RISK OF DEATH" label? by slamb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Except, with the Honda vehicle, if there is a failure in the computer system, you die. ... I rode a Segway. It had a RISK OF DEATH (all caps) label.

    If the bicycle were invented today, it would come with that label. We live in a society that is increasingly litigious and risk-averse. These both apply more for newer and higher-tech things - more so for commercial airplanes than cars, in spite of their relative risks.

    People don't usually die in {bicycle,Segway,Honda thing} crashes, but they do sometimes, and for a new device, that's enough that its creators usually fear lawsuits without that label. These things might be a bit silly and overpriced, but they're not dangerous no matter what the stupid sticker says.

  16. Re:Yes, but where is the "RISK OF DEATH" label? by tmosley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Rubber duckies have "RISK OF DEATH" labels on them now too. All thanks to kindly Nannie State.

    Regulations force a climate of CYA to the point of crying wolf all day every day. A vehicle that travels at 3.7 miles an hour IS NOT DANGEROUS. AT ALL.

  17. Re:RISK OF DEATH by aurispector · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The basic question is this: why bother with these things? So mall cops don't have to do any actual walking? Total waste of time.

    --
    I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.