Slashdot Mirror


AU Government To Build "Unhackable" Netbooks

bennyboy64 writes "In what may be one of the largest roll-outs yet of Microsoft's new Windows 7 Operating System, Australia's Federal Government decided to give 240,000 Lenovo IdeaPad S10e netbooks to Year 9-12 students. Officials are calling them 'unhackable.' iTnews reports that the laptops come armed with an enterprise version of the Windows 7 OS, Microsoft Office, the Adobe CS4 creative suite, Apple iTunes, and content geared specifically to students. New South Wales Department of Education CIO Stephen Wilson said that schools were 'the most hostile environment you can roll computers into.' While the netbooks are loaded with many hundreds of dollars worth of software, 2GB of RAM, and a 6-hour battery, the cost to the NSW Department of Education is under $435 (US) a unit. Wilson praised Windows' new OS: 'There was no way we could do any of this on XP,' he said. 'Windows 7 nailed it for us.' At the physical layer, each netbook is password-protected and embedded with tracking software that is embedded at the BIOS level of the machine. If a netbook were to be stolen or sold, the Department of Education is able to remotely disable the device over the network. Each netbook is also fitted with a passive RFID chip which will enable the netbooks to be identified 'even if they were dropped in a bathtub.' The Department of Education also uses the AppLocker functionality within Windows 7 to dictate which applications can be installed."

11 of 501 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sure... by 2.7182 · · Score: 1, Funny

    No they need openbsd with that...

  2. Re:Too late by Proudrooster · · Score: 4, Funny

    There were these guys that made this ship that was "unsinkable" which on its maiden voyage ran into an iceberg and sank. Compromising the BIOS in this case is analogous to the iceberg. "Unsinkable, Unhackable, Waterproof." BTW, isn't the Thinkpad supposed to work underwater?

  3. Re:So stupid by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Footnote: Yes, I'm aware that security through obscurity is no security at all, but that's not the issue here. The issue is that instead of nobody caring or trying to break the reasonable security they've implemented, now they've got thousands of people working on it. THAT does matter.

    Security through obscurity's little brother? Security through "meh"?

  4. Unhackable laptop? by Chief+Crazy+Chicken · · Score: 5, Funny

    etch-a-sketch!

    1. Re:Unhackable laptop? by Russianspi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shake, shake, shake. Pwned!

  5. Re:Too late by wes33 · · Score: 4, Funny

    hey - some guy on slashdot said he talked to some other guy
    who Australia who heard from somewhere that these computers
    could be hacked

    It *must* be true!

  6. Re:Anonymous Coward by anarche · · Score: 2, Funny

    A country run by anonymous cowards...

    --
    Wait! Whats a sig?
  7. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am not some guy, I am Anonymous Coward, I have more posts than anybody else here, and I am a trusted member of this community. Your sarcasm is completely out of place.

  8. Re:So stupid by macieklen · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's still better than security by denial (usually seen in mac users)

  9. Re:Sure... by hawk · · Score: 3, Funny

    In fact, it sounds kind of like naming your daughter, "Chastity" . . .

    hawk

  10. Re:Too late by ignavus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just spoke to a friend in Australia.. its been pwned already...

    Australia's been pwned already!?!

    Well, yeah, any Aboriginal person can tell you that.

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.