Slashdot Mirror


AU Government To Build "Unhackable" Netbooks

bennyboy64 writes "In what may be one of the largest roll-outs yet of Microsoft's new Windows 7 Operating System, Australia's Federal Government decided to give 240,000 Lenovo IdeaPad S10e netbooks to Year 9-12 students. Officials are calling them 'unhackable.' iTnews reports that the laptops come armed with an enterprise version of the Windows 7 OS, Microsoft Office, the Adobe CS4 creative suite, Apple iTunes, and content geared specifically to students. New South Wales Department of Education CIO Stephen Wilson said that schools were 'the most hostile environment you can roll computers into.' While the netbooks are loaded with many hundreds of dollars worth of software, 2GB of RAM, and a 6-hour battery, the cost to the NSW Department of Education is under $435 (US) a unit. Wilson praised Windows' new OS: 'There was no way we could do any of this on XP,' he said. 'Windows 7 nailed it for us.' At the physical layer, each netbook is password-protected and embedded with tracking software that is embedded at the BIOS level of the machine. If a netbook were to be stolen or sold, the Department of Education is able to remotely disable the device over the network. Each netbook is also fitted with a passive RFID chip which will enable the netbooks to be identified 'even if they were dropped in a bathtub.' The Department of Education also uses the AppLocker functionality within Windows 7 to dictate which applications can be installed."

7 of 501 comments (clear)

  1. Same Govt. by retech · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is the same govt. that put a guy in jail on child pornography charges for having a Simpson's parody porno on his computer.

    Ignorance and arrogance seem to always walk hand in hand.

  2. Re:Too late by poetmatt · · Score: 5, Informative

    yeah, nuking the bios from a cd is ridiculously easy. It's actually a feature that people can do so. Hirens boot CD comes with very simple methods for that.

    I bet someone will just make an app that unlocks the laptop and wipes the firmware for them so that the laptops can have actual use.

  3. Haha.. no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work for one of the departments involved, hence the anonymous post.

    This is typical government posturing, and has nothing little to do with the what's actually going on.

    From what I've seen, the RFID chips are redundant, they're using the machine's BIOS UUID to track machines through software, I don't think they even record the embedded RFID codes at all, as that requires a physical reader device, and they're not handing them out to schools. Normally, RFID tags aren't used for anti-theft, but for inventory tracking.

    The BIOS tracking is pretty standard and off-the-shelf, it's not designed to stop professionals, but it will catch stupid thieves. Software protection is not huge, but most 'problems' will be met with an F12 network boot and a fresh system image, so the harm students can do will be limited and easily reversible. Students get limited space to save their work, and that is backed up centrally, so they shouldn't lose any data. On top of that, most questionable sites are blocked by the internet proxies, so that cuts out lots of potential sources of harmful stuff.

    Really, the true protection the laptop gets is that every student receives one for free, but a replacement laptop has to be paid for out of their parent's pockets. Students will learn to be careful with them or face punishment from their parents.

    There's lots of other silliness going on though, especially as it's my tax dollars going to waste.

    For example, the enterprise agreement for the Adobe CS4 suite was a big deal. They spent millions purchasing the software before anyone had actually tried running any of it on an actual laptop. Only after the government had signed the contracts did they bother, only to find out that the screens were too small. All of the Adobe dialog boxes were designed for a vertical height larger than the physical screen resolution, so the OK/Cancel buttons are cut off. The workaround was to install a driver that supports a larger virtual desktop and pans the screen around. It's hideous. This is what happens when you let politicians make technical purchasing decisions.

    Similarly, the laptops are rather anemic, which is expected for a netbook, but a lot of the software and content they want to publish is very video-centric. Apparently some types of video, like Flash content and h264, don't always play well, and high-res content is a slide show.

  4. Re:Sure... by Spatial · · Score: 5, Informative

    For anyone wondering why that's so bad, a 1.6GHz Atom is somewhere around an 800Mhz Pentium 3 in terms of performance.

  5. The Slashdot editor degraded the story. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative

    It seems to to me that, given the Slashdot summary, GradiusCVK is correct when he said this in his original comment, although he could have shown more elegant manners:

    'Instead, some[one] announces to the world "Bow to our unhackable laptops! We are awesome! HAHAHA!", and now thousands of hackers and security researchers out there have made it their personal crusade to find a way to totally decimate all the security on the box.'

    However, the problem is with kdawson, the Slashdot editor, not the Australian government or the article to which the Slashdot summary links.

    The article says, "[government] seeks to build 'unhackable' netbook network". The meaning is that the Australian government is doing the best it can in building a network.

    kdawson, the Slashdot editor says, "... Government To Build "Unhackable" Netbooks".

    kdawson made the title sensationalist and misleading. This amazes me: In all these years, Slashdot editors seem to have learned nothing about being editors. kdawson turned a wonderful story into a misleading experience.

    1. Re:The Slashdot editor degraded the story. by multisync · · Score: 3, Informative

      However, the problem is with kdawson, the Slashdot editor

      kdawson, the Slashdot editor says, "... Government To Build "Unhackable" Netbooks".

      kdawson made the title sensationalist and misleading.

      kdawson turned a wonderful story into a misleading experience

      Your obvious derision for kdawson notwithstanding, the "NSW seeks to build 'unhackable' netbook network" headline came from the itnews.com.au site, which you would have discovered for yourself if you had clicked the second link in the article.

      Your anti-kdawson rant also misses the real point, which is that this "wonderful story," as you describe it, is nothing more than part of Microsoft's Windows 7 launch campaign. The real story lies in this paragraph:

      incredibly, while the netbooks are loaded with many hundreds of dollars worth of software, 2GB of RAM and a six hour battery, the cost to the NSW Department of Education is under $500 a unit.

      Wow! That is incredible, and a real coincidence that this is occurring just as Microsoft prepares to roll out Windows 7.

      What you should be taking Slashdot to task for is allowing this advertisement - replete with Microsoft marketing phrases like "Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) " and quotes from DET executives gushing that "There was no way we could do any of this on XP" - to run, instead of an insightful analysis of what this little Microsoft publicity stunt was really all about. Of course your TCO will be way down when Microsoft gives you enterprise versions of their software for free.

      As someone mentioned above, this is a victory for "trusted computing," and other technologies for enabling corporations to control your hardware. Someone should write an article about that.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
  6. I've used one by bbqsrc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Right, well, I actually attend one of the schools who have a deployment of these laptops.

    There's a label on the bottom that threatens you that if you steal it the police will find you. There's tamper-proof screws, so normal phillipshead's wont do the job. The BIOS is obviously passworded, and I managed to break the bootloader of Windows 7 by pressing ESC twice. No OS found apparently.

    For "secure" laptops, you can right click pretty much anything and run it as an admin. We ran cmd.exe as an admin to create a proper Admin account. Completely bypasses AppLocker. Apparently, according to the laptop admins, the government wont allow printer drivers that aren't already part of Windows 7, so no printing for you.

    The laptop maintainers don't even have administrator access. They have to box the laptops up and ship them to a centre to be "fixed", even if it's as simple as reinstalling a driver. Pathetic.

    It's only early days, and the nuking of the bios can be done easily, through Wubi or other means, but USB boot is disabled so you'll have to find alternative means. And I know it's likely moot to post so late after the rush, but I had to say it.

    Btw, it's CS4 Elements, it's not the true suite. And it includes Dia, the open-source diagram editor, which I found odd. Open source deployments always amuse me.

    To finish, Firefox is not included by default and has many issues when installing, as you don't have access to Program Files, so it confuses the installer to no end unless you change where you're installing it to.

    These laptops require ethernet access to activate and are mapped to a single username, so good luck using it if you don't have a Department of Education account. The all have filtering software so no porn for you kids, even when at home. Myspace and Facebook are blocked even from home connections. It's a rather horrible crippled setup that I'd wish upon no-one.

    Welcome to the future of computing. Homeschool your kids.

    --
    Disagree != mod troll.