Slashdot Mirror


'09 Malibu Vs. '59 Bel Air Crash Test

theodp writes "To celebrate their 50th anniversary, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crashed a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air into a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu. Hate to spoil the ending of the video, but if you find yourself participating in a similar car-jousting contest, pick the Malibu over the Bel Air. (Not that you'll be complaining afterwards if you don't, or doing much of anything.) Guess there is something to those crumple zones after all."

8 of 496 comments (clear)

  1. Speaking as a non-car-freak by Eevee · · Score: 5, Funny

    All I can say is "You bastards! You murdered a car with tail fins! Have you no heart?

  2. I see the problem. by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 5, Funny
    It should have been a reverse Bel Air.

    Now this is a story all about how my life got flip turned upside-down. I'd like to take a minute, just sit right there, I'll tell you how I totally destroyed a classic car in the name of science.

    --
    Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
  3. Re:the wunnerful 50's, not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But then again, back in the 50's we didn't need all these fancy crumple zones, seat belts and air bags. Men were real men. Hell, I'll bet you dollars to donuts any man from the 50's driving that Bel-Air would have jumped right out of that wreck to help the crying sissy-boy with a cut lip driving that Malibu.

  4. that would be Fifth Gear by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 5, Funny

    Top Gear tries to stay away from useful facts and info as much as possible.

    And the idea of Top Gear having TWO cars that cost below $40,000 on the screen at the same is pretty far fetched.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  5. Re:the wunnerful 50's, not by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My observations were that I'd much rather be in an old tank like that in a minor accident. Anything major, and I'd rather be in a modern car with things like seatbelts, crumple zones and air bags.

    Yep, that's why before getting involved in any traffic accident, I always carefully choose the car I own which would be best suited. Now if you'll excuse me, I might accidentally run over my neighbour in his backyard while I'm on my way to the store. I think I'll pick the Hummer, it's the better one to get through wooden fences.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  6. Re:Classic Cars by RabidMoose · · Score: 5, Funny

    And now, it's just a little bit rarer.

  7. Re:Classic Cars by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good news for the Bel Air owner though: the fuzzy dice looked like they survived mostly intact, although I think the string connecting them got ripped or cut.

    Seriously, points to IIHS for including the dice. You can see them flying around the cockpit at 1:03 to 1:09. They look like they might present a hazard of as you are crashing, they might hit you in the eye, potentially causing you to blink and miss the carnage right before you die.

  8. Re:Where's the engine? by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

    The straight 6 engines in those cars offered no protection in an offset crash, and just smashed back through the dash killing the occupants, who were dead anyway.

    Fucking classic-car-driving zombies...