Slashdot Mirror


StackOverflow For Any Topic

RobinH writes "StackOverflow, the successful question-and-answer website for programmers, is now over a year old and its top user has just passed 100,000 reputation points. Now one of the creators of StackOverflow, Joel Spolsky, and his company Fog Creek, are developing a software-as-a-service form of the StackOverflow engine called StackExchange to support any topic you want. The software is currently in private beta, but the first few beta sites have surfaced. Topics include business travel, the home, parenthood, the environment, finance, and iPhone game development."

15 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Joel, uhg.. by RingDev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I wholey appreciate the community and efforts of people involved in StackOverflow, I believe that Joel is subject to entirely too much fanfair and hero worship. I'd line him up right next to Dvorak in the grouping of "Right about as often as the sun shines on my dog's ass."

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  2. They tried this with Ask Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone remember the short lived Ask Slashdot section on sex? No one had any answers, so they had to shut it down.

  3. How very random. by stevey · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is good to know that the parenting forum is asking the most important questions.

  4. Re:A compelling need? by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have you used Stack Overflow? It's quite different from a Wiki, and is much more focused than a bulliten board. The ability to rate questions and answers makes it much easier to find good responses than generic phpBB sites.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  5. Re:Good job, too by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, the difference is programmers usually know how to -ask- questions that make sense to other programmers. Look at http://answers.yahoo.com/ for a moment, most of the questions there are either A) Obvious "do my homework for me" questions, B) badly worded questions or C) Simply stupid questions. Also, most programming questions are easy, either it works or it doesn't, on the other hand how exactly do you define "how hard it is to open a liquor store in Texas"? Its easy to answer programming questions because its very easy to figure out if it works, but parenting advice? You won't see the results of that for years down the line (if even that) and its impossible to determine what exactly went wrong/right.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  6. Re:The Karma-Whoring Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    You would have a point, except StackOverflow provides dumps of their databases in XML format and under a public license.

  7. Re:A compelling need? by jjohnson · · Score: 5, Funny

    The posters at Stack Overflow know what they're talking about.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  8. Re:A compelling need? by seifried · · Score: 4, Informative

    You get useful answers that actually help.

  9. Re:Yahoo! Answers by seifried · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, because until you interact with the community and earn points it's hard to make an asshat of yourself. I recommend you watch "Learning from StackOverflow": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWHfY_lvKIQ

  10. Re:Too bad StackOverflow sucks. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That'll be why it never comes up on searches.

    90% of the time if I have to hit google for answers it's because something is giving a stupid error message (google for the message text) or error code (google for the number.. that can be fun..). Keywords won't cut it, because they assume I know what the problem is already (and if I knew that I'd hit the documentation and work it out myself).

  11. Re:The Karma-Whoring Generation by Blackeagle_Falcon · · Score: 5, Informative

    But, hey! What happens when StackOverflow folds (which it will, eventually)?

    Then, suddenly, all the knowledge contracts and contracts to a single point until it goes "POOF!" - nada, zero.

    Actually, all the content on StackOverflow is licensed under the Creative Commons CC-Wiki license. They make monthly dumps of the entire question and answer database available. If SO ever folds, it would be quite easy to use the data dump to put up a new site with all the accumulated knowledge

  12. Re:I don't get it by D+Ninja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Never seen it come up in a google search.. maybe it's got its niche..

    Usenet beats any of these sites anyway - there's decades of experience on that.

    No, it doesn't always come up in Google search (try searching with site:stackoverflow.com in your programming searches, though), because that is Google's algorithm. As far as a programming/technical site, though, Stackoverflow (and its sister sites; serverfault.com (for admin/IT questions) and superuser.com (for general computer use questions)) is a *wonderful* resource. Don't knock it until you try it.

    As for your comment about Usenet, I do agree that there is a myriad of experience on there. Nowhere else are you going to see the beginnings of Linux and quite a bit of discussion on other technologies. BUT - Stackoverflow is current, its well moderated (by a user-community) and has some extremely knowledgeable and thoughtful people on its site to help out.

    I disagree with the GP post that is simply a Slashvertisement. I wish someone had told me about the site sooner.

  13. Face it, stack* is *good* by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's very well designed. Compared to anything else in the same category, it's like the iPhone to a generic WinMo phone. It's easy to use, it's intuitive, it's powerful, it's fast, it's obvious and yet nobody comes close.

    I've heard many people make fun of Joel, and I would have been a bit skeptical but stackoverflow is an undeniable success.

  14. Re:A compelling need? by noundi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The mods at Stack Overflow know what they're talking about.

    Fixed it for ya.

    --
    I am the lawn!
  15. BB is the reason Stack Overflow exists by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Jeff Atwood has said a number of times one of the reasons Stack Overflow came about is because he hated all of the BB systems around. And he was right, the existing BB systems are terrible to use, especially so for a Q&A site.

    The site is also better than a wiki for Q&A, because it has really well thought out community moderation aspects. You get more duplication than you would with a wiki, but it works out because you also get heavy user moderation redirecting you to better questions. And because it's a cross between a wiki and a forum, you have a much better ability to have different viewpoints of solutions expressed - for instance a user asking a question can accept an answer as valid, but other users can all vote up other answers as being more correct and those get prominent placement too.

    If BB software and wikis are all so good, why is it nothing with the popularity and update of Stack Overflow has existed until now? I've never seen a programming site with such traction and quick uptake, never mind one that covered such a gamut of subjects! It's not just at the top of the list for C# (which is to be expected given the pedigree) but also iPhone development, and is the first place I would go for Emacs elisp questions... even Java.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley