Slashdot Mirror


A "Photon Machine Gun" For Quantum Computers

An anonymous reader writes "Generating entangled photons in a reliable way is impossible right now, stalling the development of the optical quantum computers that would use entangled photons as quantum bits (qubits). Because entangled photons can only be produced at random — which takes time — the most powerful optical quantum computing device use only 6 qubits. UK and Israeli quantum physicists have designed a blueprint for a 'quantum machine gun' that fires out barrages of entangled photons on demand. They think within a few years this device will be built, and could lead to quantum computing using 20 to 30 qubits. Every additional qubit doubles the computing power, so these quantum computers could outperform any existing classical computer, the researchers say. The quantum machine gun is described as 'one of the most exciting theoretical proposals I've read in five years' by a leading quantum physicist." The research was published in Physical Review Letters earlier this month.

10 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. For certain problems. by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Every additional qubit doubles the computing power, so these quantum computers could outperform any existing classical computer, the researchers say.

    But only for probabilistic algorithms. It's not going to be faster at everything.

    1. Re:For certain problems. by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      But only for probabilistic algorithms. It's not going to be faster at everything.

      So Whpt if we occjsion?lly fl#p a fwe bits.
         

  2. Not particularly useful against an insurgency by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Israeli quantum physicists have designed a blueprint for a 'quantum machine gun'

    In other news, Palestinian quantum physicists have designed shoulder-mounted quantum launchers and quantum vests in response.

    Civilians are hopeful for peace and terrified for escalation of hostilities.

    1. Re:Not particularly useful against an insurgency by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Informative

      Harmful harmful force? Dude i think you need to re-evaluate your worldview if you want to blame the group being constantly attacked and threatened with the explicit goal of genocide for everything wrong. The mere presence of jews in the middle east produces the reaction you see from Hamas and friends, whether or not Israel was officially a state would have fuck all to do with anything other than the success of those attempts at genocide.

      Hell Hamas' own govt charter explicitly blames the jews (merchants of death) for everything from the french and russian revolutions to both world wars while outright demanding the death of every jew and anyone who refuses to participate in said genocide.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Not particularly useful against an insurgency by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So in other words you want them to do the exact opposite of the only thing keeping the number of rockets and mortars fired at Israeli (arab AND jew) civilian targets in the low to mid thousands rather than much higher.

      What did we do with vietcong tunnels in vietnam? The ones used for moving and storing weapons and occasionally fired from. We demolished them. What does israel do with houses build on top of tunnels or used as weapons caches. They demolish them. If people don't want their house bulldozed all they need to do is say "No you cannot indiscriminately attack civilians from my house or store/transport the weapons you use to do that in/through my house."

      As for the borders, wtf do you suggest they do? Just open them up for MORE weapons to get smuggled through?

      The religious extremists in the region already HAVE a concrete and unarguable reason for doing what they do, it's called genocide. This has NOTHING to do with Israel as a state and everything to do with the fact that there are jews and christians (but mostly jews) over there that aren't dead yet. Read the Hamas charter sometime, the slaughter of all jews everywhere is listed as mandatory for the messiah to come in it. If you think anything Israel does has ANY bearing on anything the palestinians do you're delusional.

      There's a palestinian couple living a few apartments away from me, do you know what he calls palestinians that don't want to kill all the jews? Israelis. Just like the million and a half arabs living in israel that are ALSO a target of palestinian violence because they don't join the genocidal crusade Hamas is currently leading.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  3. no peeking by RuBLed · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not going to be faster at everything.

    It's going to be faster at everything.

  4. Re:Explain the hype, please? by noundi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok, so on this site bursting with intelligent, educated folk...

    You lost me at "Ok".

    --
    I am the lawn!
  5. Re:Explain the hype, please? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok, I just wrote a lengthy reply, and then by accident hit "refresh", and all the text was gone :-(

    Therefore here the short version:

    • The speedup is basically because for quantum systems the dimension of the configuration space grows exponentially rather than linearly with the size of the system (i.e. number of qubits). The fact that we can't simply measure the complete state is actually a limitation, because it means we cannot directly access an arbitrary unknown state.
    • You can do quantum computing by just doing measurements because every measurement modifies the measured system, and with entangled states, this change is non-local (i.e. you also modify parts of the system where you didn't just destroy any entanglement by your measurement). However you need special entangled states to do universal measurement-based quantum computing (i.e. to allow arbitrary transformations with measurement only); one state which works is the cluster state produced by this "photon machine gun"
    • They didn't claim that qubits revolutionize storage, but that if emulating the 20 to 30 qubit quantum computer on a classical computer, it would not fit into computer storage. However I doubt that; storing the state of 30 qubits needs about 16 GB, which is large, but perfectly doable in todays computers (and may be actually standard by the time this photon gun is realized). The problem with simulating the quantum computer would not be storage, but time.
    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  6. Dirty Erwin by ciderVisor · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know what you're thinking: "Did he flip six qbits or only five?" Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is a Photon Machine Gun, the most powerful quantum entanglement source in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: Is the cat dead or alive ? Well, is it, punk ?

    --
    Squirrel!
  7. Heh by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The quantum machine gun is described as 'one of the most exciting theoretical proposals I've read in five years' by a leading quantum physicist.

    The long winter nights must just fly by.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/