Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

4-Winged Proto-Bird Unearthed In China; Predates Archaeopteryx

Posted by timothy on from the four-wings-perhaps-the-earliest-insult dept.

Wired reports on a find described September 24 in a note at Nature and the day after at the annual meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology: a dinosaur fossil bearing true feathers on four limbs. The fossil was discovered in northeastern China, in strata believed to have been deposited between 151 million and 161 million years ago. If that estimate is correct, the newly discovered Anchiornis huxleyi is at least one million years older than the believed age of the more famous winged dinosaur Archaeopteryx.

7 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. What's next? by flubba · · Score: 5, Funny

    8-Winged Meta-Bird?

    --
    riverrun, past Eve and Adamâ(TM)s, from swerve of shore to bend of bay, brings us by a commodius vicus of recircul
    1. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Followed by an N-Winged pseudo-bird

    2. Re:What's next? by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I won't be happy until I get my p-winged quantum bird.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  2. Re:PBS covered this... by AndersOSU · · Score: 4, Funny

    hey back off, on an evolutionary time scale, that's lightning fast.

  3. Gilette Mach 5 Uber-Bird by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Fuck it, we're going to five wings."

  4. Re:PBS covered this... by oGMo · · Score: 4, Funny

    So this is old news. I guess dinosaur news travels slowly.

    Are you kidding? The story comes 151 million years after the fact! And that wasn't even the release date!

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  5. Nutjobs out in force by T.E.D. · · Score: 5, Funny

    The really depressing thing is the article comments. It seems the Creationists found out about the article, and are pinging the bejeezus out of it in the comments.

    My personal favorite bit of ignorance starts like this:

    am nor a scientist or even an academic of any kind but as I understand it and please tell me if I am wrong but for a Theory to become fact it has to ...

    *raaaaaaaaz*! Thanks for playing.