Slashdot Mirror


Jack Thompson Sues Facebook For $40M

angry tapir writes "Jack Thompson has sued Facebook for US$40 million, saying that the social networking site harmed him by not removing angry postings made by Facebook gamers. The lawsuit was filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Thompson is best known for bringing suit against Grand Theft Auto's Take Two Interactive, Sony Computer Entertainment America, and Wal-Mart, arguing that the game caused violent behavior."

16 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. Mental illness is no laughing matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This man seriously needs some help from a professional.

  2. Wasn't this tool suspended from the bar? by Nursie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know that doesn't stop him using other lawyers to sue people, but I would think it probably says a lot about the validity of said facebook postings if he *was* struck off for being a serial asshat.

  3. Can't blame Facebook by Pedrito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sorry Jack, but Facebook didn't make people hate you. You did that all on your own.

    What a tool!

    1. Re:Can't blame Facebook by techiemikey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree completely with you that Facebook didn't make people hate him...his own actions did. Unfortunately Jack Thompson might (for once) have something on his side since he's complaining that Facebook didn't remove the hate groups against him (like the now removed "i'll pay someone $50 for a video of you punching Jack Thompson in the face" post) but removed a poll of "Should Obama be shot." I don't think it's unreasonable he found a lawyer to help him on this one.

  4. Opinions - People are entitled by realsilly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really hope this Lawsuit is thrown out, simply because people are entitle to their opinions of this guy and what he stands for. He seems to forget that he's on some sort of one man crusade to fight computer game industry, and puts himself out there ans is not ready to be scrutinized for what he believes in. These individuals are using the tools provided to them to voice their opinions. We still have that right to free speech. I have not read these posts, and nor do I want to, thus the beauty of the Net. Now that Mr. Thompson has advertised that these posts exists, he's drawing national attention to them and may find that more people agree with the angry posts rather than his points.

    I don't necessarily agree with vial and viscious things but people will do what people will do.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  5. Might as well sue himself by FrostDust · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think Jack Thompson's caused more harm to "Jack Thomspon" than any other entity possibly could.

  6. Re:He never seems to learn... by thepotoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whether he was disbarred or not doesn't really seem to matter.

    Slashdot (and the gaming media in general) are doing a fantastic job feeding his narcissism just by reporting on every frivolous lawsuit. He's just a really skilled troll, and everyone always falls for him.

    (Of course, if we ignored him, he'd probably go away only to be replaced by an anti-gaming figurehead that wasn't batshit fucking insane, so maybe it's best for everyone to just keep him around for the amusement factor.)

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
  7. Forty million? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Living in a country where you can't sue people for amounts like forty million dollars for Facebook postings sounds, well, friggin ridiculous.

    I wonder how much just keeping the legal system running and churning through all these cases costs in tax dollars for a US citizen...

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  8. The Difference between a Troll and a real Monster by djdavetrouble · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's just a really skilled troll, and everyone always falls for him.

    I would have to disagree, a troll is aware of his/her trolling, it is intentional.
    Jack is like a troll, except for the fact that he is dead serious, and there is no "lol, trolled".
    He really would restrict your rights and regulate the hell out of video games and the
    rest of the online world that in his eyes is destroying the morals of America.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  9. Re:He never seems to learn... by Narpak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find this lawsuit fairly amusing and hypocritical; since Thompson himself claimed First Amendment protection against his critics, and then when for good measure that the criticism of him violated state religious protection laws since he was motivated by his faith.

    Mister Thompson wasn't damaged by "angry postings made by Facebook gamers" he was damaged by all the stupid, unethical (and illegal) crap he did that spawned those posts. This is just a greedy lawyer who got himself disbarred through his own machinations trying to get himself a payout so he can finance his insidious campaign of ignorance and fear. Hope Facebook takes this to court and tear Mister Thompson a proverbial "new one".

  10. Re:The Difference between a Troll and a real Monst by Dotren · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, he really does. It was rap music before it was video games, but he honestly believes they are destroying our moral framework.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_(attorney)

    The truly ironic part is that people like him do far more damage to this country than any cultural phenomena they point their fingers at.

    Just imagine if he got his way.. how many of our rights would be trampled and how many would feel oppressed due to someone else's morality being forced upon them?

  11. Re:The Difference between a Troll and a real Monst by macshit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's just a really skilled troll, and everyone always falls for him.

    I would have to disagree, a troll is aware of his/her trolling, it is intentional. Jack is like a troll, except for the fact that he is dead serious, and there is no "lol, trolled".

    On usenet, the distinction is made between a "troll", and a "netkook"; their behavior is often strikingly similar, except that the former is doing it intentionally to incite reponses, whereas the latter actually believes what he's saying.

    Jack, I gather, is more of a kook than a troll...

    --
    We live, as we dream -- alone....
  12. Re:The Difference between a Troll and a real Monst by dwiget001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeap, and before rap music, rock and roll destroyed our moral framework.

    And sometime before rock and roll, swing destroyed our moral framework.

    I am sensing a pattern here.

  13. Re:The Difference between a Troll and a real Monst by s4m7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd say the Morals of America have greatly changed since it's founding.

    Yeah, I miss the old days of witch-burning, slavery, and industrial child labor, too. /p

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
  14. You don't really believe that, do you? by Attack+DAWWG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to a country that bans prayer in school.

    Prayer is not banned in school. Kids can pray all they want. Government-forced prayer is banned in school. For some reason that gets conservatives so mad you would think they were about to bust an artery.

    1. Re:You don't really believe that, do you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should read more. Like, perhaps, the article you linked to.

      The criminal charges, of which they were acquitted, were for contempt of a court order, not for blessing the meal. They were at a luncheon (not a dinner) on school property and had obviously done it in the past since a court had told them they couldn't do it anymore. And yet they did it anyway. And someone had to have complained on both occasions or the ACLU would have never known about it. That's hardly the situation you described.

      Also, if you read more, you'd know the difference between the pledge of allegiance and the pledge of elegance. I'm not sure I've ever heard of the pledge of elegance, but it sounds like it would be making students pledge to wear ball gowns and tuxedos to school which seems like a stupid idea. I'd also venture that we'd be doing away with the pledge of allegiance regardless of it's references to God. Blind allegiance to the state is the stuff of fascist and communist governments, not supposedly free countries like the US. Students shouldn't feel forced to support their country any more than they should feel forced to believe in a religion.

      And Christians are so quick to believe that Christmas is such an innocuous subject and yet would be up in arms if the school play or carols dealt with another religion. They don't want to see a school play depicting the miracle of the lamp oil that should have lasted only 1 night but lasted 8 nights (the basis for Chanukah) and they don't want their kids learning songs about dradles. Why should students and parents from other religions be forced to see plays and sing songs about Christmas when they're not allowed to see plays and sing songs about their own religion?

      There's a good reason why the rules about separation of church and state are in place. Without them, state officials who are religious can and would use their authority to push their religion onto others. Christians don't get the benefit of the doubt for the same reason that Microsoft doesn't get the benefit of the doubt...they have a long history that indicates exactly what they'd do if not controlled. And laws cannot be applied selectively or there would be chaos. So we have to balance the occasions where something that seems innocuous isn't allowed against the occasions where something oppressive is allowed when creating laws.

      What is fucking ridiculous is that we have to keep fighting this battle with Christians over and over again since they can't seem to practice their religion on their own time and in their own homes and facilities. If you want religion in schools, go to a non-secular private school.