Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Verizon Refuses To Provide Complete IPv6

Posted by kdawson on from the no-routing-around-it dept.

Glendale2x writes "I'm a progressive sort of guy and I want to go full dual-stack, IPv6 for the future, etc. However I recently tried to turn up a new Verizon circuit with IPv6 (after a 6-month fiber install process), and to my chagrin the order they accepted back in May they're now saying is against their policy to provide. They're missing around 29% of the IPv6 internet and refuse to carry it. Tell me again how we're supposed to encourage IPv6 adoption in the face of a huge black hole like this?"

2 of 438 comments (clear)

  1. You aren't seeing the whole picture by davidwr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks to China's Carrier-grade NAT you aren't seeing levels seven through 1,345,751,000. In China OLPC means One Level of network address translation Per Citizen.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:You aren't seeing the whole picture by mysidia · · Score: 5, Funny

      That would be OLTPC or OLNATPC

      Actually, n/m, come to think of it.. many to one translations are commonly called PAT, NAPT, PNAT, or "Overload NAT".

      Oh, and though it may be a matter of debate, some folks swear that it's incorrect to call those NAT.

      So OLPPC (One layer of PAT per citizen) or OLNPPC (One layer of Network and Port Address translation per citizen), OLNAPTPC, or respectively OLNAPTC OLPNATPC, or OLNPC

      But not OLPC...

      Oh, what were we talking about again?