Slashdot Mirror


FTC States Bloggers Must Disclose Paid Reviews

An anonymous reader writes to tell us that in the first revision of how endorsements and testimonials work since 1980, bloggers will now be required by the FTC to clearly disclose freebies or payments they received for product reviews. "the commission stopped short Monday of specifying how bloggers must disclose any conflicts of interest. The FTC said its commissioners voted 4-0 to approve the final guidelines, which had been expected. Penalties include up to $11,000 in fines per violation. The rules take effect Dec. 1."

8 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Astroturfing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh please. It has not prevented David Pogue fapping over every Apple thing ever. And he writes for NYT.

  2. Re:US only by MarkRose · · Score: 1, Troll

    Then they don't suffer such fascist oppression. Unless, of course, their country happens to have an extradition treaty with the US...

    --
    Be relentless!
  3. Re:Astroturfing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    You're coming to _SLASHDOT_ of all places, and you expect astroturfing to _STOP_? Malda thrives on astroturfing, it's what keeps this site alive. The minute he figured out that hey, I can post an advert for anything I like, call it a story and get the kickbacks, this place went straight down the fucking toilet, and it's _not_ going to stop. You can be guaranteed that Malda and every other bumfuck "Internet entrepreneur" will find a way around this one.

  4. Re:enforcement by bonch · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's not intended to be enforced. It's supposed to get people used to the idea of the government passing regulations for the internet. We have a White House that can't even stand the idea of people criticizing the president without getting reported to flag@whitehouse.gov. As time goes on, we'll see more and more government control of this crazy, uncontrolled haven of free speech. Basically, the government wants the internet back.

    Is it really so hard for people to use their brains and exercise their own judgement when reading a review online? The danger of the internet is that you accept what you read at your own risk, but it's also the reward.

  5. Re:The unregulated internet by bonch · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's the FTC.

    This is unenforceable. What counts as a blog? How would you report the blog? Do you shoot an email to flag@whitehouse.gov so Obama can get on the case? Will the government employ people to clean up the internet? Will there be an internet taskforce?

    Because it's unenforceable, it's a meaningless regulation. All it does is get people used to the idea of the government passing regulations on the internet. They want their ARPANET back. If people get used to the idea of the government having control of the internet, then this crazy experiment of near-total freedom goes away.

  6. Re:Moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm the guy that modded many of your comments in this story down. It looks as though you are trolling. You've written at least a half a dozen rabidly anti-government, anti-regulation screeds in this story. I'm sick and fucking tired of a few libertarian types with loud voices attempting to convince everyone that the government is evil and everything it does is wrong and bad. Government and laws exist to protect the weak and powerless from oppression at the hands of the sociopathic and powerful. I modded you troll because you are an apologist for unrestricted tyranny of the rich and powerful over all other interests. You don't want regulation because you know it is a way for the powerless to stand up against the powerful, and in your mind, the powerless are powerless because they should be and the powerful have power because they deserve it. In your mind, anything that moves society away from this natural state of affairs where the powerful oppress the powerless is evil and unnatural, So, LOTS of troll mods for you today, buddy.

    Troll hunter OUT.

  7. Re:Astroturfing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Then that would mean, judging by your user ID, that you've been a turd for at least a few years longer than I have, going by your logic. An unflushed, stale turd. A piece of shit floating in a morass of his own filth. Better still, a piece of shit which actually has the audacity to try to be clever rather than just accept what he is -- a piece of shit.

    Any other witty retorts you'd like to make, feel free, I don't need to stick around to make sure you'll make a fool of yourself...you're quite adept at it already. Besides, I don't waste my time on shitdicks like yourself very often, so feel priviliged that for once in your pathetic life, you got some attention. Savour it. It's probably the last time it'll ever happen in your meaningless, faux-intellectual existence. Oh yeah, that and making "Googol the Destroyer" apparently. Wow, a lame joke about Google done D&D style, your name is going to go down in the fucking history books alright, little man. You must have spent all of three days without bathing writing that shit up. Doesn't surprise me that you'd be "feeding the trolls," something tells me you haven't got anything resembling a personality or a social life. You'd be better off putting a .45 to your temple and blowing a hole in your empty fucking skull than risking your genetic material tainting the rest of us, that is if you haven't knocked up one of your immediate relatives AGAIN. On the other hand a piece of shit like you isn't worth a bullet, not with the ammo shortages. Maybe you could all do us a favour and just bludgeon yourself over the head with a hammer until the hot air starts whistling from between your ears?

    Just thought you should know.

  8. Re:Astroturfing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Aww, little boy is so sensitive that he had to break out the mod points. Can't take what you dish out, eh pussy? The only thing funny about you is that you weren't aborted when your parents had the chance.