Slashdot Mirror


How Dangerous Could a Hacked Robot Possibly Be?

alphadogg writes "Researchers at the University of Washington think it's finally time to start paying some serious attention to the question of robot security. Not because they think robots are about to go all Terminator on us, but because the robots can already be used to spy on us and vandalize our homes. In a paper published Thursday the researchers took a close look at three test robots: the Erector Spykee, and WowWee's RoboSapien and Rovio. They found that security is pretty much an afterthought in the current crop of robotic devices. 'We were shocked at how easy it was to actually compromise some of these robots,' said Tadayoshi Kohno, a University of Washington assistant professor, who co-authored the paper."

12 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. More or less irrelevant by Cornwallis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No matter how "fixed" things are someone will always find a way to circumvent security.

    1. Re:More or less irrelevant by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hardly irrelevant.

      "Someone" will always find a way; but there is a big difference between "someone" being "any script kiddie who can torrent a copy of bot-h5x-b0t" and being "The Feds; but they'll say 'Fuck it.' and just send a couple of guys with guns and those little curly ear things instead."

    2. Re:More or less irrelevant by noundi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, because no one would ever do something purely for the challenge and then release their work.

      If it takes longer to crack something that the product of cracking it is worth, you'd have no reason to even begin.

      Hint: "challenge" is the key word.

      Answer: You assume that by worth I mean monetary gains. The satisfaction of completing the challenge is also a product of cracking it, which has its own value. You see, clicking a button that starts bruteforcing something which would take 50-60 years isn't a challenge worth the product.

      --
      I am the lawn!
  2. Somehow I see a danger in this . . . by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They speak of "compromising" these robots as if user programmable devices are inherently bad. I don't want to see devices locked down into black box "no touch" state because of some fear mongering.

    That said, it has always been the case with computers (and robots are just computers with moving appendages) that if a hacker has physical access to the device, you're basically screwed anyways.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  3. hmm by Dyinobal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The hacked robot is as dangerous as the person who hacked it.

  4. Re:The First Law of Robotics by jimicus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    See Isaac Asimov for the exact quote, but it basically says robots may not harm humans. Because the law is encoded *in the hardware* there's no way that it can be altered.

    Very noble, very pure, very useless when your robot doesn't have any intelligence and just executes commands blindly.

  5. I'm not worried about RoboSapien by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm more concerned about someone hacking a Predator or Reaper.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:I'm not worried about RoboSapien by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And, out of interest, the chips used to implement those features were made in which Chinese factory?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Re:The First Law of Robotics by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    See Isaac Asimov for the exact quote, but it basically says robots may not harm humans. Because the law is encoded *in the hardware* there's no way that it can be altered.

    Except that pretty well all of Asimovs stories were about how the 3 laws could be subverted by finding complex interactions that were not and could not be covered by the application of those simplistic laws

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  7. Re:Beware of robots by retech · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...for when the metal ones come for you, and they will.

  8. Re:The First Law of Robotics by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ugh. I feel the need to clarify, before the shouts from the peanut gallery. Yes, some robots have computer vision and are not 'blind', yes some robots can be well programmed and very smart, but that's still not the same thing as a true reasoning intelligence. Robots are only as good as their software and, if their programming has been corrupted, there is nothing you can do to get around that.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  9. Re:hacking by Hizonner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They want you to play with them and make them do cool things. They don't necessarily want other people to drive up outside your house and use the robots' cameras and microphones to spy on you over WiFi. The problem is that the features that enable the first aren't secured, and therefore they can also be used to do the second.