Slashdot Mirror
Real-LIfe Distributed-Snooping Web Game To Launch In Britain
corerunner writes "A new internet game is about to be launched which allows 'super snooper' players to plug into the nation's CCTV cameras and report on members of the public committing crimes. The 'Internet Eyes' service involves players scouring thousands of CCTV cameras installed in shops, businesses and town centres across Britain looking for law-breakers. Players who help catch the most criminals each month will win cash prizes up to £1,000."
From TFA: Three false positives and you are banned from the game.
That depends entirely on whether they are council-run CCTV cameras (ones out on the street to spot muggings, littering, vandalism, etc) or ones in stores that are run by the companies in the store/shopping centre (ones to catch shop-lifting). In the case of the former I think we technically do have access under the Freedom of Information Act. In the case of the latter I don't think you have a foot to stand on, since it is private surveillance for a company's own protection run by the company or one of its contractors.
You don't get to choose which camera you see each session. In fact, the location is 'secret' (though you may be able to figure it out). Single person surveillance won't work.
This is an opt-in service where specific people can pay a fee to have their cameras monitored by the game's players. It has no connection with the CCTV network already installed by British officials. It's basically just a very stupid and sensational business venture that will probably fail, because who's going to be willing to pay 20 quid a week for random internet people to watch their CCTV?
Firstly, this is the Daily Mail
It was also reported by the bbc http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8293784.stm
Secondly, it would be entirely illegal to do this under UK law. We have things like the Data Protection Act.
How exactly would this be in breach of the DPA?
Exigo spamos et dona ferentes
...if you're on the camera, however, it's personal information held about you on a computer system.
Which means you can demand a copy for a nominal fee under the Data Protection Act. Mark Thomas has used this extensively.
I, um, I actually find this a bit sick.
at the end of a paragraph to format it.
See? Pretty cool, huh?
If I had a neighbor who I figured was running a crack house or a meth lab, I'd love the chance to narc them out. Or, if I was concerned about vandalism of my house or car, it would be nice to have this sort of ability.
The down-side is being harassed about my small dog pooping at some random place. I'll usually kick the poop into the street, but this might not pass muster with the 'authorities'.
Best regards.
You'd think this worked by charging monitored businesses. No. It works by charging viewers to report crimes.. Read the Terms of Service. It costs viewers £1 to report an event. The captured image is sent to the camera customer by phone. The recipient rates the report, but the viewer doesn't get credit back if the report was good. The only payoff is the the monthly prize of £1000. They're going to take in far more from the viewers than they pay out.
Viewers do get a credit of £3 per month they can use for reporting, so it's not totally pay to play.
Each viewer is shown four random cameras at a time. Every 20 minutes, or if they report something, they get a new set of cameras. So viewers never get to see the results of their reports.
Anonymous' idea of a "deserving target" is not something usually lines up with any rational persons' idea, rescuing abused felines aside.
You can request any footage of yourself, regardless of whether it's made by a public or private company. I recall Mark Thomas did this on his TV show numerous times against various McDonalds restaurants - and was sent any due recordings.
The UK CCTV code of practice also states this, see section 9.2 (Subject access requests)
http://www.blueservo.net/ lets you watch the Texas border for illegal activity. I don't think you can win prizes, though.
God, if only you were as smart as you think you are.
This is what happens when a complete dunderhead takes a freshman philosophy course. You know what they say about a little bit of knowledge..
You are welcome on my lawn.
It does sound like the kind of thing the Daily Fail would complain about. There doesn't have to be anything "wrong" with something (as far as, say, the law or pleasant liberal-minded people are concerned) for the Mail to hate it. I don't think they'd be bothered by the Christian-ness but stuff involving immigrants, political correctness, etc is going to set them frothing at the mouth. If it could also impact house prices and increase the number of recycling bins on our doorsteps they'd probably actually explode.
Not just the Daily Mail
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8293784.stm